EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 130 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 130 (2019) 01042 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 130, 2019
The 1st International Conference on Automotive, Manufacturing, and Mechanical Engineering (IC-AMME 2018)
Article Number 01042
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913001042
Published online 15 November 2019
  1. A. Jayadi, H.A. Aziz, J. Dev. Econ., 2 : 12–27 (2017). https://ejournal.unair.ac.id/JDE/article/view/5119 [Google Scholar]
  2. S.A.F. Silalahi, Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, 5,1: 1–13 (2014). http://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/ekp/article/view/149[in Bahasa Indonesia]. [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Botta-Genoulaz, P.A. Millet, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 99(1–2): 202–221 (2006). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527304004621 [Google Scholar]
  4. H.M. Beheshti, Manag. Res. News, 29(4): 184–193 (2006). https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/01409170610665040 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leon A., Enterprise Resources Planning. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 2005. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=s5YiBAAAQBAJ&hl [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Han, P. Patterson, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 61: 131–141 (2017). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814117302731 [Google Scholar]
  7. B. K. Chae, C. Yang, D. Olson, C. Sheu, Decis. Support. Syst., 59: 119–126 (2014) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923613002595 [Google Scholar]
  8. Z.J.H. Tarigan, IJBS, 19,2: 335–346 (2018). http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/images/repository/pdf/Vol19-no2-paper6.pdf [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Madanhire, C. Mbohwa, Procedia CIRP, 40: 225–229 (2016). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827116001232 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Paulraj, I.J. Chen, J. Flynn, J. Purch. Supply Manag., 12,3: 107–122 (2006). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1478409206000653 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Sánchez-Rodríguez, J. Bus. Ind. Mark., 24,3/4: 161–172 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620910939714 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Bildsten, Procedia Econ. Financ., 21: 594–600 (2015). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212567115002178 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Liu, C. Hu, Procedia Eng., 174: 1182–1189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.277 [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Xiao, H. Zhang, T.M. Basadur, J. Bus. Res., 69,2: 587–595 (2016). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315002258 [Google Scholar]
  15. M.L. Pimenta, A.L. da Silva, W.L. Tate, Int. J. Logist. Manag., 27,2: 570–594 (2016). https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/IJLM-01-2014-0010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Gimenez, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 36,3: 231–249 (2006). https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09600030610661813 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Suprapto, Z.J.H. Tarigan, S.R. Basana, “The influence of ERP system to the company performance seen through innovation process, information quality, and information sharing as the intervening variables” in Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology, 2017, pp. 87–91. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3124131 [Google Scholar]
  18. J.-H. Wu, Y.-M. Wang, Comput. Human Behav., 23,3: 1582–1596 (2007). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563205000518 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Huang, Procedia Eng., 29: 1824–1829 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.220 [Google Scholar]
  20. I.J. Chen, A. Paulraj, A.A. Lado, J. Oper. Manag., 22,5: 505–523 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A.A. Akdogan, O. Demirtas, Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., 150: 1020–1029 (2014). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814051635 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Ince, S.Z. Imamoglu, H. Keskin, A. Akgun, M.N. Efe, Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., 99: 1124–1133 (2013). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813040317 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. T.D. Brunoe, D.G.H. Sørensen, A.-L. Andersen, K. Nielsen, Procedia CIRP, 72: 592–597 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.020 [Google Scholar]
  24. E.L. Paiva, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 126,2: 379–386 (2010). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527310001520 [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Ehm, M. Freitag, Procedia CIRP, 41: 585–590 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.143 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Zhao, L. Wang, Y. Zheng, Ind. Manag. data Syst., 114,2: 162–182 (2014). https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/IMDS-07-2013-0314 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. W.P. Neumann, A. Kolus, R.W. Wells, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49,12: 1721–1724 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.830 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.