Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 132, 2019
XXII International Scientific Conference POLSITA 2019 “Progress of mechanical engineering supported by information technology”
Article Number 01028
Number of page(s) 12
Section Engineering and Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913201028
Published online 22 November 2019
  1. N. Ozdemir, M Aksoy, N Orhan, J Mater Process Technol 14, 228 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Ebrahimnia, F. Malek Ghaini, S.H. Gholizade, M. Salari, Mater Des 33, 551 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Crossland, Contemp Phys 12, 559 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  4. American Welding Society. Recommended practice for friction welding. Miami: AWS, (1989). [Google Scholar]
  5. V.K. Lebedev, I.A. Chernenko. Welding and surface reviews. Friction welding (Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992). [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Shinoda, S. Endo, Y. Kato, Weld Int 13, 89 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Richter, A. Palzkill, Schw. und Schn 11, 188 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Winiczenko, M. Kaczorowski, Mater. Des 34, 444 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Winiczenko, M. Kaczorowski, J Mater. Process. Technol 213, 453 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ogara T, Kojoh K, Nagayoshi N, Jpn J Foundry Eng Soc 77, 39 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  11. AWS welding handbook. 2. Miami: American Welding Society (1991). [Google Scholar]
  12. ASM handbook. 6. (ASM International, Materials Park, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  13. S.B. Dunkerton, Weld J. 193, (1986). [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Deb. Optimizations for engineering design–algorithm and examples (Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  15. D.C. Montgomery. Design and analysis of experiments (Wiley, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Paventhan, Lakshminarayanan P. R, Balasubramanian V, J Iron. Steel. Res. Int 19, 66 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Paventhan, P.R. Lakshminarayanan, V. Balasubramanian, Trans. of Nonf. Met. Soc. of China 21, 1480 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Sathiya, S. Aravindan, A. H. Noorul, K. Paneerselvam, J Mater. Process. Technol 209, 2576 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Sathiya, K. Panneerselvam, M.Y. Abdul Jaleel, Mater Des 32, 1253 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Yamaguchi, K. Ogawa, K. Sakaguchi, J. Jpn. Inst. Light. Metal 41, 716 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Ozdemir, F. Sarsirlmaz, A. Hascalik, Mater Des 28, 301 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Hakan, T. Mehmet, K. Adem, Mater Des 28, 948 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  23. O. Koichi, Y. Hiroshi, K. Seiichi, S. Kazuhiko, J. Jpn. Weld. Soc 24, 47 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Udayakumar, K. Raja, T.M Afsal Husain, P. Sathiya, Mater Des 53, 226 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Udayakumar, K. Raja, A. Tanksale Abhijit, P. Sathiya, J Manuf Process 15, 558 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  26. Design-Expert software version 8.0 user’s Guide (2009). [Google Scholar]
  27. R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (New York, Wiley, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Censor. Appl Math Optim 4, 41 (1977). [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Kalyanmoy. In: Chichester, editor. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms (John Wiley and Sons, England, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Luo, Y.H. Ye, J.J. Xu, J.Y Luo, S.M. Chen, X.C Wang, Mater Des 30, 353 (2009). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.