EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 135 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 135 (2019) 03077 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 135, 2019
Innovative Technologies in Environmental Science and Education (ITESE-2019)
Article Number 03077
Number of page(s) 11
Section Green Architecture and Sustainable Urban Design
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913503077
Published online 04 December 2019
  1. G. Abuselidze. Modern Challenges of Monetary Policy Strategies: Inflation and Devaluation Influence on Economic Development of the Country. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18, 4 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Abuselidze. European Integration of Georgia and Financial-Economic Condition: Achievements and Challenges. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p53. [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Amisano, M. Serati. BVAR models and forecasting: a quarterly model for the EMU-11. Statistica, 62, 1 (2002). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/390. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Beck. Regional politics in a highly fragmented region, p. 131-335, 28 cm D. Flemes (ed), Regional Leadership in the Global System Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Ashgate Publishing. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ch. Brown, K. Ainley. Understanding International Relations. Third edition. Palgrave Macmillan. (2001). [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Bava. Foreign policy strategy between interests and ideas, p.116 in D. Flemes (ed), Regional Leadership in the Global System Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Ashgate Publishing. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Baten. Determinants of GDP Growth: A Cross-country Analysis BRAC University Department of Economics and Social Sciences (ESS) ECO 303 Introduction to Econometrics. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Bozkurt. Turkey as a NATO Ally in the Post-Cold War Period. School of Business and Governance Department of Law, Talin Univeristy of Technology. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Bayram, O. Tufekci. Turkey’s Black Sea Vision and Its Dynamics. Karadeniz Technical University. (2018). https://doi.org/10.12787/KARAM1272. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Boyer, B. Katulis. The Neglected Alliance Restoring U.S.-Turkish Relations to Meet 21st Century Challenges. Center for American Progress. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Caraiani. Forecasting Romanian GDP using a BVAR model. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 13, 4 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Chasse. Die Erfindung des Bruttosozialprodukts: globale Ungleichheit in der Wissensgeschichte der Oekonomie, Vandenhock & Ruprecht, Gottingen. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Dalgaard-Nielsen. The Test of Strategic Culture: Germany, Pacifism and PreEmptive Strikes’, SAGE Publications, 36, 3 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010605057020. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Dreher. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization, Applied Economics, 38, 10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Davutoglu. Turkish Foreign Policy and the EU in 2010, Turkish Politics Quarterly, 8, 3 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Ernst. Romania’s economy in 2018: growth slows down amid rising imbalances. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.romania-insider.com/romanias-economy-in2018-growth-slows-down-amid-rising-imbalances (Accessed: February, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Geiger. Continuous national gross domestic product (GDP) time series for 195 countries: past observations (1850-2005) harmonized with future projections according to the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (2006-2100). Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-847-2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. B.F. Giannetti, F. Agostinho, C.M.V.B. Almeida, D. Huisingh. A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality. Journal of Cleaner Production 87 (2015) 11-25. (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Gulseven. Identity security and Turkish foreign policy in the post-cold war period: Relations with the EU, Greece and the Middle East. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Goldmann, G. Harris. U.S. Imposes Sanctions on Turkish Officials Over Detained American Pastor. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/01/world/europe/us-sanctions-turkey-pastor.html (Accessed: February, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Hale. Turkish Foreign Policy 1774-2000, (London: Frank Cass Publishers). (2000). [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Henderson. Continuing the Conversation on the Politics of Happiness Is There a “politics of Happiness”?. (2010). Retrieved from http://csrwiretalkback.tumblr.com/post/720597834/continuing-the-conversation-onthe-politics-of (Accessed: January, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Horrel. A NATO Strategy for Security in the Black Sea Region. Brent Scowcroft Center on International Securuty. Atlantic Council. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  24. R.O. KeohaneJr,. Nye J.S. Globalization: What’s new? What’s not? (And so what?) Foreign Policy. 118, (2010). https://doi.org/10.2307/1149673 [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Kissinger. Diplomacy. New York. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240010822. [Google Scholar]
  26. I. Kubiszewski, R. Costanza, C. Franco, P. Lawn, J. Talberth, T. Jackson, C. Aylmer. Beyond GDP: measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecol. Econ. 93, 57-68. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Larrabee. Turkey as a U.S. Security Partner. RAND Corporation. (2008). Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg694af.8 (Accessed: January, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  28. R.D. Marcus, R.E. Kane. US national income and product statistics: born of the great depression and World War II. Bureau Econ. Anal. Surv. Curr. Bus. 87, 32-46. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  29. S.H. McCulla, S. Smith. Measuring the Economy: a Primer on GDP and the National Income and Product Accounts. Bureau of Economic Analysis: US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Nolte. How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics, Review of International Studies. 36, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Sacakli-Sacildi. Do BVAR Models Forecast Turkish GDP Better Than UVAR Models? British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 7, 4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2015/17543. [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Toi. The Turkish-U.S. Relationship Current Tensions and Future Prospects. Perspective / Fes Washington. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  33. Turkey Forecast. Related Indicators for Turkey Forecast: Real GDP Growth. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/turkey/forecast-real-gdpgrowth. [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Ustun. Theoretical Analysis of Turkey as a Regional Power, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Gediz University, Izmir. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  35. A. S. Usluer. The July 15 Failed Coup Attempt and Its Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy, Bilig, Number 79, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  36. C. Vinken. Turkey’s view on NATO through the scope of strategic culture theories (2009-2016). GeTMA Working Paper No. 11, Department of Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  37. C. A. Wallander. (1993). ‘Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War’, International Organization, 54, 4 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  38. K. N. Waltz. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security, 18, 2 (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. A. J. Yackley. Turkish economic growth slows sharply in third quarter. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/5e0f5cbe-fc4a-11e8-aebf-99e208d3e521 (Accessed: February, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Zanotti, C. Thomas. Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations. Congressional research service. Informing the legislative debate since 1914 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.