Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 136, 2019
2019 International Conference on Building Energy Conservation, Thermal Safety and Environmental Pollution Control (ICBTE 2019)
Article Number 04084
Number of page(s) 6
Section Urban Public Safety
Published online 10 December 2019
  1. Hill, H. (2013). Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 35(2), 137-142. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lubin, A., & Deka, D. (2012). Role of public transportation as job access mode: Lessons from survey of people with disabilities in New Jersey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2277), 90-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee, B. K., Agarwal, S., & Kim, H. J. (2012). Influences of travel constraints on the people with disabilities’ intention to travel: An application of Seligman’s helplessness theory. Tourism Management, 33(3), 569-579. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fredman, S. (2017). Disability equality: A challenge to the existing anti-discrimination paradigm?. In Disability and Equality Law (pp. 123-142). Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou, H., Hou, K. M., Zuo, D., & Li, J. (2012). Intelligent urban public transportation for accessibility dedicated to people with disabilities. Sensors, 12(8), 10678-10692. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buhalis, D., Darcy, S., & Ambrose, I. (Eds.). (2012). Best practice in accessible tourism: Inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism. Channel View Publications. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nhamo, E., & Sibanda, P. (2014). Reviewing benefits and barriers associated with the participation of persons with disabilities in sport, exercise, physical and leisure activities. International journal of science and research, 3(8), 304-307. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lubin, A., & Deka, D. (2012). Role of public transportation as job access mode: Lessons from survey of people with disabilities in New Jersey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2277), 90-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kerbler, B. (2012). A toolkit for detecting and eliminating the barriers that people with disabilities face in the built environment: the case of Slovenia, Europe/Engellilerin yapili cevrede karsilastiklari engelleri saptamak ve gidermek icin bir arac seti: Slovenya ornegi, Avrupa. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 29(2), 235-258. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hästbacka, E., Nygård, M., & Nyqvist, F. (2016). Barriers and facilitators to societal participation of people with disabilities: A scoping review of studies concerning European countries. Alter, 10(3), 201-220. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jamaludin, M., & Kadir, S. A. (2012). Accessibility in buildings of tourist attraction: A case studies comparison. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 97-104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marisamynathan, & Perumal, V. (2014). Study on pedestrian crossing behavior at signalized intersections. In CICTP 2014: Safe, Smart, and Sustainable Multimodal Transportation Systems (pp. 2641-2652). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Small, J., Darcy, S., & Packer, T. (2012). The embodied tourist experiences of people with vision impairment: Management implications beyond the visual gaze. Tourism Management, 33(4), 941-950. [Google Scholar]
  14. Carmien, S., Dawe, M., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., Kintsch, A., & Sullivan Jr, J. F. (2005). Socio-technical environments supporting people with cognitive disabilities using public transportation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 233-262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Lachapelle, Y. (2011). Emerging new practices in technology to support independent community access for people with intellectual and cognitive disabilities. NeuroRehabilitation, 28(3), 261-269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shapiro, J. P. (2011). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. Broadway Books. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kamarudin, H., Hashim, A. E., Mahmood, M., Ariff, N. R. M., & Ismail, W. Z. W. (2012). The implementation of the Malaysian Standard Code of Practice on access for disabled persons by local authority. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 442-451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Soltani, S. H. K., Sham, M., Awang, M., & Yaman, R. (2012). Accessibility for disabled in public transportation terminal. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 89-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wahab, S.N., Lay, Y.F., Koay, W.L., & Hussin, A.A.A, (2019). Usage of Pedestrian Bridge among the Urban Commuters in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Operational Research, DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2021.10019276. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sham, R., Wahab, S.N., Anuar, M.M., Tong, W.H. & Yap, J.T. (2019). Safety Indicator for Taxi Users in Urban Area. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), pp. 1035-1041. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wong, C. H., Tan, G. W. H., Tan, B. I., & Ooi, K. B. (2015). Mobile advertising: the changing landscape of the advertising industry. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 720-734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wahab, S.N., & Khong W.L. (2018). Multiple Linear Regression Modelling of Parcels’ Distribution Design Factors and online Shopping Customer Satisfaction. International Journal of Modelling in Operations Management, 7(2),95-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rajendran, S.D., Wahab, S.N, Ling, Y.W., and Yun, L.S. (2018) The Impact of Logistics Services On the E-Shoppers’ Satisfaction, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(5),461-469. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.