Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 143, 2020
2nd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2019)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 5
Section Architectural Engineering and Urban Construction
Published online 24 January 2020
  1. Lu, K. and H. Wang, Estimation of Building’s Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Based on Life Cycle Assessment and Building Information Modeling: A Case Study of a Hospital Building in China. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot., 7(6): p. 147-165 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. Gan, V.J.L., et al., Holistic BIM framework for sustainable low carbon design of high-rise buildings. J. Clean Prod., 195: p. 1091-1104 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenner, A.E., et al., The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 94: p. 1142-1152 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wong, J.K.W. and J. Zhou, Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: A review. Autom. Constr., 57: p. 156-165 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Penttilä, H., Describing the changes in architectural information technology to understand design complexity and free-form architectural expression. Electron. J. Inform. Technol. Constr., 11: p. 395-408 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  6. Luo, T., et al., Mapping the knowledge roadmap of low carbon building: A scientometric analysis. Energy. Build., 194: p. 163-176 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. Kesidou, S. and B.K. Sovacool, Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 113: p. 109274 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pritchard, A., Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J. Doc., 25(4): p. 348-348 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao, X., A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. Autom. Constr., 80: p. 37-47 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Song, J., H. Zhang, and W. Dong, A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization. Scientometrics, 107(3): p. 1111-1147 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamdem, J.P., et al., Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976-2016). Food Chem, 294: p. 448-457 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. van Eck, N.J., et al., A Comparison of Two Techniques for Bibliometric Mapping: Multidimensional Scaling and VOS. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol, 61(12): p. 2405-2416 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. van Eck, N.J. and L. Waltman, Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2): p. 523-538 (2010) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ahmed, S. and B. Huang, Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2): p. 523-538 (2010) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pereira Domingues Martinho, V.J., Interrelationships between renewable energy and agricultural economics: An overview. Energy Strategy Reviews. Energy Strateg. Rev., 22: p. 396-409 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Soust-Verdaguer, B., C. Llatas, and A. García-Martínez, Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings. Energy. Build.,. 136: p. 110-120 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ansah, M.K., et al., A review and outlook for integrated BIM application in green building assessment. Sust. Cities Soc., 48: p. 101576 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Santos, R., et al., Informetric analysis and review of literature on the role of BIM in sustainable construction. Autom. Constr., 103: p. 221-234 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.