Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 143, 2020
2nd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2019)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 9
Section Architectural Engineering and Urban Construction
Published online 24 January 2020
  1. R M. Searns, Landscape and Urban planning, The evolution of greenways as an adaptive urban landscape form, 33, 65-80 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  2. K J. Dawson, Landscape and Urban Planning, A comprehensive conservation strategy for Georgia’ s greenways, 33, 27-43 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  3. J W. Bai, P L. Zhang, J. Du, et al. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf, A Spatial Analysis Approach for Evaluating the Service Capability of Urban Greenways—A Case Study in Wuhan, 6, 208 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. X J. Li, N. Chen, K S. Chen, Modern Urban Research, Research on interaction between sport and leisure oriented greenway constructions and city: A case study of Taibei riverside bike trails, 34-40 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  5. R L. Oliver, Journal of Marketing Research, A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequ-ences of satisfaction decisions, 17, 460-469 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T G. Tae-Hyoung, Sustainability, Tourist Satisfaction, Image, and Loyalty from anInterregional Perspective: An Analysis of Neighboring Areas with Distinct Characteristics, 10, 1283 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Zhou, H J. He, H. Rong, Economic management journal, The evaluation of tourist satisfaction and its influencing factors in rural tourism in China, 38, 156-166 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. H D. Feng, J. Yang, R. Zhang, et al. Modern Urban Research, A study of measurement of urban road public service facility customer satisfaction, 89-94 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Zhang, B. Qiu, C J. Wang, Modern Urban Research, Research on the impact factors of open space user satisfaction-the main city of Nanjing for the analysis, 49-55 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. X H. Yang, Y G. Liu, Journal of Southwest Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), Public greenway satisfaction evaluation of IPA-based approach: Foshan city, Guangdong province as an example, 10, 1-7 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Zhao, J H. Gong, Y L. Li, Areal Research and Development, Research on the recreational greenway user’s behavior and experience satisfaction in rural areas, 35, 110-114 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. J J. Xie, C P. Liu, Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Fuzzy Mathematics Method and Application(The 4th Edition), 87 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. L L. Xiang, Y X. Sun, M L. Li, Planners, A Fuzzy Evaluation Approach To The Study On Creative Class’s Public Communication Spaces, 97-104 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. Notice of the Shanghai Municipal Greening and City Appearance Administration on Printing and Distributing the Guidelines for the Construction of Shanghai Greenway (Trial). 2016. Available online: 52.html(accessed on 12 August 2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Bai, Y F. Ma, T S. Li, et al. Acta Geographica Sinica, An association study on tourists’ cognition, perceived value and behavior intention based on structural equation model(SEM): A case study of inbound tourists in Xi’an City, 65, 244-255 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  16. T H. Lian, C H. Yu, X J. Bao, et al. Resource Science, Study on the tourists’ satisfaction of theme park based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation: Taking Wuhu Fangta wild as an example, 34, 973-980 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Lian, X. Wang, Tourism Tribune, A case study and application of customer satisfaction evaluation system in tourist destination based on TDCSI, 19, 9-13 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  18. T L. Jiang, Z J. Niu, N Y. Hu, et al. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Greenway satisfication investigation based on the importance-performance analysis method, 25, 815 (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.