Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 156, 2020
4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering & Disaster Mitigation (ICEEDM 2019)
Article Number 02017
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geotechnical
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015602017
Published online 13 March 2020
  1. Seed H.B. and Idriss I.M., J. Soil Mech. Found Div. 97 1249–1273 (1971) [Google Scholar]
  2. Iwasaki, T., Tokida, K. and Tatsuoka, F., Int. Conf. on Recent Adv. in Geotech. Earthq. Engg and Soil Dyn. 12. April 26th - May 30th, (1981) http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd/01icrage esd/session02/12 [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim H.S., Cho N.G. and Chung C.K., 15th WCEE, Lisboa 2012 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dixit, J., Dewaikar, D.M. and Jangid R.S., Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 12 2759–2768, (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sarker D. and Ansary M.A., IOSR-JMCE 12 (2) 132-138, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. Luna, R. and Frost, J. D., J. Comp. Civil Eng. 12 48–56 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chung, J.W. and David Rogers J., J. of Geo. and Geoenviro Eng. 137(5),505-515, (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maurer B.W., Green R.A., Cubrinovski M. and Bradley B.A., Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI) for Assessing Liquefaction Hazard: A Case Study in Christchurch, New Zealand, Poster UC, Christchurch, NZ, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35471699.pdf (Accessed, May 2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. Hakam, A., J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 48(3), 334-344 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Seed, H. Bolton dan Idriss I.M., Ground Motion and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, 1982 [Google Scholar]
  11. Youd, T. L. and Idriss, I. M., J. Geo. and Geoenviro Engg., ASCE, 297-313, (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shibata, T. and Teparaksa, W., J. Soils and Foundations, 28(2), 49-60, (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hakam A., J. Eng. Tec. and Sc., 48(3), 334-344, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hakam A., Ismail F.A., Fauzan, Int. J. of GEOMATE, 11 (26) 2553-2557 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. Urmi Z.A. and Ansary M.A, Conf. CPT18 At Netherlands, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmertmann J.H. (1975) State of the art paper: measure of in situ strength. Proceedings of ASCE Conference on in situ Measurements of Soil Properties, Raleigh, North Carolina, 57–138. [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmertmann J.H. (1978), Guidelines for Cone Penetration Test, Performance and Design. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 145, Report FHWA-TS-78–209. [Google Scholar]
  18. Robertson P. K. and Cabal K.L., Guide to Cone Penetration Testing, GREGG inc., 2010 [Google Scholar]
  19. Douglas, B. J. and Olsen, R. S., Proc. of the ASCE National Convention, St. Louis,209-27, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), (1981) [Google Scholar]
  20. Muromachi T. Proc. Symp. on Cone Penet. Testing and Experience, Geotech. Engg Div. ASCE, St. Louis, Missouri, 49–75, (1981) [Google Scholar]
  21. Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G. and Wightman, A., J. of Geo. Eng., ASCE 109 (11) 1449–14, (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.