Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 157, 2020
Key Trends in Transportation Innovation (KTTI-2019)
Article Number 06021
Number of page(s) 9
Section Energy Efficient Building Design
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015706021
Published online 20 March 2020
  1. Y. Wang, B. Chen et al., IFAC-PapersOnLine, 1-50, 3811-3816 (2017), DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.486 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Zhou, K. Tang et al., Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 18-5, 816–830, (2014) DOI:10.1080/13632469.2014.908152 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Yamamoto, Y. Sato, S. Inoue, Japan Architectural Review, 1-3, 322–330 (2018), DOI:10.1002/2475-8876.12035 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. A. McConnell, National Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, (1989) DOI:10.1109/nsemc.1989.37151 [Google Scholar]
  5. J. T. Kozák Earthquake Source Asymmetry, Structural Media and Rotation Effects, 3-10 (2006). DOI:10.1007/3-540-31337-0_1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Kim, O. Lukovenkova et al., E3S Web of Conferences, 20, 02003, (2017) DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/20172002003 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. O. Lukovenkova, Y. Marapulets et al., E3S Web of Conferences, 62, 02012, (2018) DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/20186202012 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. O. A. Savinov, A. M. Uzdin et al., Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 32-4, 124–129 (1995), DOI:10.1007/bf02336273 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Léger, M. Leclerc, Engineering Structures, 18-3, 227–239 (1996). DOI:10.1016/0141-0296(95)00146-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. O. P. Nesterova, Bulletin of Civil Engineers, 2-16, 48–53 (2019). DOI:10.23968/19995571-2019-16-2-48-53. [Google Scholar]
  11. T.V. Ivanova, J. Guan et al., Magazine of Civil Engineering, 75-7, 129–138 (2017). DOI: 10.18720/MCE.75.13. [Google Scholar]
  12. G.A. Bogdanova, A.A. Dolgaya et al., 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, 1358 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  13. I. P. Pryadko, Vestnik MGSU, 11, 97–104 (2012). DOI:10.22227/1997-0935.2012.11.97-104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Perelmuter, V. Slivker, Springer Science & Business Media, (2013) DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-36500-6_5 [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Yanik, U. Aldemir, M. Bakioglu Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures 8, (2011) DOI:10.2495/eres110061 [Google Scholar]
  16. K.K.F. Wong Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8-2, 315–334 (2004). DOI:10.1080/13632460409350491 [Google Scholar]
  17. K. W. Campbell, Y. Bozorgnia, Earthquake Spectra, 28-2, 457–485, (2012) DOI:10.1193/1.4000012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. B. A. Bradley, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 78, 89–98 (2015). DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.07.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Crespellani, C. Madiai, G. Vannucchi, Analysis and Design of Retaining Structures against Earthquakes (1996), DOI:10.1061/9780784402061.008 [Google Scholar]
  20. G. L. Choy, J. L. Boatwright New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice, 2, 19 (2012), DOI:10.4095/222533 [Google Scholar]
  21. H.B. Ozmen, M. Inel, Earthquakes and Structures, 6-10, 1315-1330 (2016). DOI:10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1315 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Faccioli, R. Paolicci, Ju. Rey, Earthquake Spectra, 2-20, 347-376 (2004). DOI:10.1193/1.1707022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A.N. Birbrayer Raschet konstruktsiy na seysmostoykost, (Nauka, SPb, 1998) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.