Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 158, 2020
2019 7th International Conference on Environment Pollution and Prevention (ICEPP 2019)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015802002
Published online 23 March 2020
  1. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. 1998. Population size and growth of major cities. Karachi: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad, Nuzhat. 1993. “Choice of Neighbourhoods by Mover Households in Karachi.” Urban Studies 1257-1270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad, Nuzhat. 1993. “Choice of Neighbourhoods by Mover Households in Karachi.” Urban Studies 30 (7): 1257-1270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ainsworth, Barbara E, William L Haskell, Melicia C Whitt, Melinda L Irwin, Ann M Swartz, Scott J Strath, William L O’brien, et al. 2000. “Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise Exercise (32): 498-504. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amer, Khawaja. 2013. Population explosion: Put an embargo on industrialisation in Karachi. October 06. Accessed January 17, 2014. http://tribune.com.pk. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aytur, Semra A, Daniel A Rodriguez, Kelly R Evenson, Diane J Catellier, and Wayne D Rosamond. 2007. “Promoting Active Community Environments Through Land Use and Transportation.” American Journal of Health Promotion Promotion (21): 397-407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aytur, Semra A, Daniel A Rodriguez, Kelly R Evenson, Diane J Catellier, and Wayne D Rosamond. 2008. “The sociodemographics of land use planning: Relationships to physical activity, accessibility, and equity.” Health & Place 14: 367-385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baran, Perver K, Danial A Rodri Guez, and Asad J Khattak. 2008. “Space Syntax and Walking in a New Urbanist and Suburban Neighbourhoods.” Journal of Urban Design Vol. 13. No. 1, 5–28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Blakely, Edward J, and Mary G Snyder. 1997. “Divided We Fall: Gated and Walled Communities in the United States.” In Architecture of Fear, by Edward J Blakely and Mary G Snyder, edited by Nan Ellin. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boarnet, M.G. & Greenwald, M.J. 2000. “ Land use, urban design, and nonwork travel: reproducing other urban areas’ empirical test results in Portland, Oregon.” Transportation Research Record 1722, pp. 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bordoloia, Pupjyoti, Amit Motea, Partha Pratim Sarkarb, and C Mallikarjuna. 2013. “Quantification of Land Use Diversity in The Context of Mixed Land Use.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 563-572. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Breitung, Werner. 2012. “Enclave Urbanism in China: Attitudes Towards Gated Communities in Guangzhou.” Urban Geography Geography (33): 278-294. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brownson, R.C., C.M. Hoehner, F. Day, A. Forsyth, and J.F. Sallis. 2009. “Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science.” Am J Prev Med 36:S99–123 e112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke, Matthew, and Christian Sebaly. 2001. “Locking in the pedestrian? The privatised streets of gated communities.” World Transport Policy & Practice (7): 61-66. [Google Scholar]
  15. Forsyth, A. 2006. “ Twin Cities Walking Study: Environment and Physical Activity: .” GIS Protocols, Version 4.0. Available at http://www.designcenter.umn.edu/projects/current/health/epaGISprotocols.html. [Google Scholar]
  16. Forsyth, Ann J, Michael Oakes, Kathryn H Schmitz, and Mary Hearst. 2007. “Does Residential Density Increase Walking and Other Physical Activity?” Urban Studies 679-697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Frank, Lawrence D, Thomas L Schmid, James F Sallis, James Chapman, and Brian E Saelens. 2005. “Linking Objectively Measured Physical Activity with Objectively Measured Urban Form: Findings from SMARTRAQ.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine (28): 117-125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giles-Corti, B., Timperio, A., Bull, F., & Pikora, T. 2005. “Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews.” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 33(4), 175e181. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenwald, M J, and M.G. Boarnet. 2000. “Built environment as determinant of walking behavior: analyzing nonwork pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon.” Transportation Research Record 1780, pp. 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gul, Yasmeen. 2017. “EFFECTS OF NEIGHBOURHOOD ENVIRONMENT ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES IN GATED AND NON-GATED NEIGHBOURHOODS IN KARACHI, PAKISTAN.” Thesis. Johar Bahru: University Technology Malaysia, October. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gul, Yasmeen, Zahid Sultan, and Foziah Johar. 2016. “Effects of Neighborhood’s built environment on physical activities in gated communities: a review.” International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gul, Yasmeen, Zahid Sultan, and Gul Ahmed Jokhio. 2018. “The association between the perception of crime and walking in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods of Asian developing countries.” Heliyon 715. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gul, Yasmeen, Zahid Sultan, Mehdi Moeinaddini, and Gul Ahmed Jokhio. 2019. “Measuring the differences of neighbourhood environment and physical activity in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods in Karachi, Pakistan.” Journal of Urban Design 494-513. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gul, Yasmeen, Zahid Sultan, Mehdi Moeinaddini, and Gul Ahmed Jokhio. 2018. “The effects of physical activity facilities on vigorous physical activity in gated and non-gated neighborhoods.” Land use policy 155-162. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gul, Yasmeen, Zahid Sultan, Mehdi Moeinaddini, and Gul Ahmed Jokhio. 2019. “The effects of socio-demographic factors on physical activity in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods in Karachi, Pakistan.” Sport in Society 1225-1239. [Google Scholar]
  26. Handy, S.L. 1996. “Urban form and pedestrian choices: study of Austin neighborhoods, ,.” Transportation Research Record 1552, pp. 135–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Handy, Susan. 2004. “Community Design and Physical Activity: What Do We Know? – and what DON’T we know.” University of California Davis. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hillier B., Hanson J. 1984. “The Social Logic of Space.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang, Bin, and Xintao Liu. 2010. “Automatic generation of the axial lines of urban environments to capture what we perceive.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science Volume 24, Issue 4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kockelman, Robert, and Kara Cervero. 1997. “Travel Demand And The 3ds : Density , Design And Diversity.” ransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 199-219. [Google Scholar]
  31. Koohsari, Mohammad Javad, Andrew T Kaczynski, Gavin R Mcormack, and Takemi Sugiyama. 2014. “Using Space Syntax to Assess the Built Environment for Physical Activity: Applications to Research on Parks and Public Open Spaces.” Leisure Sciences 206-216. [Google Scholar]
  32. Krizek, K.J. 2003. “ Residential relocation and change in urban travel: does neighborhood-scale urban form matter?” Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(69), pp. 265–279. . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Leisch, Harald. 2002. “Gated communities in Indonesia.” Cities (19): 341-350. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lida, Bill Hillier, and Shinichi. 2005. “Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement.” Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement 475–490. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, Xintao, and Bin Jiang. 2012. “Defining and generating axial lines from street center lines for betterunderstanding of urban morphologies.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26(26) 1521–1532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Manaugh, Kevin, and Tyler Kreider. 2013. “What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 6(63-72). [Google Scholar]
  37. McNally, M G, and S Ryan. 1993. “Comparative assessment of travel characteristics for neotraditional designs,. “ Transportation Research Record, 1400, pp. 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  38. Medicine, Transportation Research Board/Institute of. 2005. Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence,. TRB Special Report, 282. [Google Scholar]
  39. Miao, Pu. 2003. “Deserted Streets in a Jammed Town: The Gated Community in Chinese Cities and Its Solution.” Journal of Urban Design (8): 45-66. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mohamad, Wan Saiful Nizam Wan, and Ismail Said. 2014. “Differences of street connectivity between old and new zone in Malaysian small town.” International Alliance for Sustainable Urbanization and Regeneration. 501-510. [Google Scholar]
  41. Moudon, A V, C Lee, A.D Cheadle, Garvin C, D Johnson, T.L Schmid, R Weathers, and L Lin. 2006. “Operational definitions of walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights.” Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3(Sup. 1), pp. S99–. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. 2016. NationsOnline.org. http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/bigcities.htm. [Google Scholar]
  43. Organization, World Health. 2010. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. [Google Scholar]
  44. Peponis, John, Jean Wineman, Mahbub Rashid, S Kim, and Sonit Bafna. 1997. “On the Generation of Linear Representations of Spatial Configuration.” S PACE SYNTAX FIRST I NTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM. LONDON. [Google Scholar]
  45. Strath, Scott, Raymond Isaacs, and Michael J Greenwald. 2007. “Operationalizing Environmental Indicators for Physical Activity in Older Adults.” J Aging Phys Act. 15 (4): 412-424. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Turner, Alasdair, Alan Penn, and Bill Hillier. 2005. “An Algorithmic Definition of the Axial Map.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science Vol 32, Issue 3. [Google Scholar]
  47. World Atlas. 2017. Populations Of 150 Largest Cities In The World. Groningen: University of Groningen. Accessed June 2, 2016. http://www.worldatlas.com/citypops.htm. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.