Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 158, 2020
2019 7th International Conference on Environment Pollution and Prevention (ICEPP 2019)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 5
Section Low Carbon and Emission Reduction
Published online 23 March 2020
  1. Bernstein, L., et al., Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report., in International Panel on Climate Change. 2007: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schwartz, S.E., Uncertainty in climate sensitivity: Causes, consequences, challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2008. 1(4): p. 430-453. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nijnik, M., Chapter 8 Carbon Capture and Storage in Forests, in Carbon Capture: Sequestration and Storage. 2009, The Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 203-239. [Google Scholar]
  4. Herzog, H., J. Meldon, and A. Hatton, Advanced Post-Combustion CO2 Capture. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  5. Akhtar, F., et al., Colloidal processing and CO2 capture performance of sacrificially templated zeolite monoliths. Applied Energy, 2012. 97(0): p. 289-296. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lv, X., et al., High CO2/H2 and CO2/CH4 selectivity in a chiral metal-organic framework with contracted pores and multiple functionalities. Chem Commun, 2014(52(2014)): p. pp. 6886-6889. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yu, C.H., C.H. Huang, and C.s. Tan, A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, X., et al., Molecular basket sorbents polyethylenimine–SBA-15 for CO2 capture from flue gas: Characterization and sorption properties. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2013. 169(0): p. 103-111. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmidt-Winkel, P., et al., Mesocellular Siliceous Foams with Uniformly Sized Cells and windows. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1999(121, 254-255). [Google Scholar]
  10. BP, BP Energy Outlook 2035 January 2014. 2014: London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmidt-Winkel, P., et al., Microemulsion Templating of Siliceous Mesostructured Cellular Foams with Well-Defined Ultralarge Mesopores. Chem. Mater, 2000(12, 686-689). [Google Scholar]
  12. Yan, X., et al., Amine-modified mesocellular silica foams for CO2 capture. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011. 168(2): p. 918-924. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bansal, R.C. and M. Goyal, Activated Carbon Adsorption. 2005: Taylor & Francis. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thommes, M., Physical Adsorption Characterization of Nanoporous Materials. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2010. 82(7): p. 1059-1073. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sing, K.S.W., et al., Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985. 57: p. 603-619. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gregg, S.J. and K.S.W. Sing, Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. Second ed. 1982, San Diego: Academic Press Inc. [Google Scholar]
  17. Monazam, E.R., J. Spenik, and L.J. Shadle, CO2 desorption kinetics for immobilized polyethylenimine (PEI). Energy & Fuels, 2013. 28(1): p. 650-656. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, Z., et al., Enhancing sorption performance of solid amine sorbents for CO2 capture by additives. Energy Procedia, 2013. 37: p. 205-210. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.