EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 159 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 159 (2020) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 159, 2020
The 1st International Conference on Business Technology for a Sustainable Environmental System (BTSES-2020)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Chapter 3: Responsible Consumption and Production
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015903005
Published online 24 March 2020
  1. V. Bhardwaj, A. Fairhurst, Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 20 (1), 165–173 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Siegle, Why Fast Fashion is Slow Death for the Planet. The Guardian Viewed 7 February from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/may/08/fast-fashion-deathfor-planet, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Liobikienė, Š. Grincevičienė, J. Bernatonienė, J. Clean, Environmentally friendly behaviour and green purchase in Austria and Lithuania. Prod. (142) 3789–3797, (63) 143–151 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Mutanov, S. Ziyadin, A.A. Shaikh, Enterpreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6 (4) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, (NJ, 1980). [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Ajzen, From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Action Control. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 11–39 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Liobikienė, J. Mandravickaitė, J. Bernatonienė, Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: a cross-cultural study. (125) 38–46, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. S.C. Tseng, S. W. Hung, J. Clean, A framework identifying the gaps between customers’ expectations and their perceptions in green products. 59 (174–184), (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Johnstone, C. Lindh, J. Consum. Behav, The sustainability-age dilemma: a theory of (un) planned behaviour via influencers. 17 (1), 127–139 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Nittala, Green consumer behavior of the educated segment in India. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 26 (2) 138–152, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Phipps, L. K. Ozanne, M. G. Luchs, S. Subrahmanyan, S. Kapitan, J. R. Catlin, T. Weaver, J. Bus, Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: a social cognitive framework. Res. 66 (8), 1227–1234, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Johnstone, C. Lindh, J. Consum, The sustainability-age dilemma: a theory of (un) planned behaviour via influencers. 17 (1), 127–139 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. M. Mostafa, Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. 31 (3), 220–229 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Lee, Making environmental communications meaningful to female adolescents: a study in Hong Kong. Sci. Commun. 30 (2), 147–176 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Lee, The green purchase behavior of Hong Kong young consumers: the role of peer influence, local environmental involvement, and concrete environmental knowledge, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Richins, S. A. Journal of Consumer Research, (19) 303–316 (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Cleveland, W. Chang, Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 963–971 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  18. L. J. Shrum, N. Wong, F. Arif, S. K. Chugani, A. Gunz, T. M. Lowrey, K. Scott, Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1179–1185 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Belk, Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (265–280) (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Ziyadin et al. The role of social media marketing in consumer behaviour /E3S Web of Conferences. (2019). DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913504022 [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Newholm, D. Shaw, Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 6(5) 253–270 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Atkinson, Y. Kim, “I drink it anyway and I know I shouldn’t”: Understanding green consumers’ positive evaluations of norm-violating non-green products and misleading green advertising. Environmental Communication, 9(1) 37–57 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  23. D. M. Zane, J. R. Irwin, R. W. Reczek, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 337–349 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Belk, Journal of Consumer Research, (12) 265–280 (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Ulrich, C. Sarasin, (Eds.). Facing public interest: The ethical challenge to business policy and corporate communications (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Kumar, A. K. Manrai, L. A. Manrai, J. Retail. Consum. Serv, Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: a conceptual framework and empirical study. 34 (1–9), (2017). [Google Scholar]
  27. Akhmetshin, E. M., Vasilev, V. L., Bakhvalov, S. I., Prikhod’ko, A. N., & Kazakov, A. V. (2017). International Journal of Economic Research, 14(15), 409-416. [Google Scholar]
  28. P. A. M. Van Lange, W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, H.A.M. Wilke, Social dilemmas: the state of the art-introduction and literature review, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  29. Mutanov, G., Ziyadin, S. E3S Web of Conferences, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913504056 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Kumar, B. M. Ghodeswar, Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions. Mark. Intell. Plan. 33 (3), 330–347 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.