Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 162, 2020
The 4th International Conference on Power, Energy and Mechanical Engineering (ICPEME 2020)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01006 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Power and Energy Engineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016201006 | |
| Published online | 07 April 2020 | |
- J. Contreras, O. Candiles, J.I. De La Fuente, T. Gomez. Auction design in day-ahead electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(1), 88–96. (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Elmaghraby, S.S. Oren. The efficiency of multiunit electricity auctions. The Energy Journal, 89-116. (1999). [Google Scholar]
- L. Meeus, K. Verhaegen, R. Belmans. Block order restrictions in combinatorial electric energy auctions. European journal of operational research, 196(3), 1202–1206. (2009). [Google Scholar]
- Á. Sleisz, D. Raisz. Clearing algorithm for minimum income condition orders on European power exchanges. In 2014 55th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON) (pp. 242–246). IEEE. (2014). [Google Scholar]
- Á. Sleisz, D. Raisz. Efficient formulation of minimum income condition orders on the allEuropean power exchange. Periodica Polytechnica Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 59(3), 132–137. (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Á. Sleisz, D. Divényi, D. Raisz. New formulation of power plants’ general complex orders on European electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 169, 229–240. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Madani. Revisiting European day-ahead electricity market auctions: MIP models and algorithms (Doctoral dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain). (2017). [Google Scholar]
- M. Madani, M. Van Vyve. Minimizing opportunity costs of paradoxically rejected block orders in European day-ahead electricity markets. In 11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. (2014). [Google Scholar]
- G. Federico, D. Rahman. Bidding in an electricity pay-as-bid auction. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 24(2), 175–211. (2003). [Google Scholar]
- F. Ding, J.D. Fuller. Nodal, uniform, or zonal pricing: distribution of economic surplus. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20(2), 875–882. (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Csercsik. Price decoupling in a simple electricity market model with block and minimum income condition orders. In 2018 19th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON) (pp. 193-197). IEEE. (2018). [Google Scholar]
- D. Csercsik, Á. Sleisz, P.M. Sőrés. The Uncertain Bidder Pays Principle and Its Implementation in a Simple Integrated Portfolio-Bidding EnergyReserve Market Model. Energies, 12(15), 2957 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- F. De Lillo, F. Cecconi, G. Lacorata, A. Vulpiani, EPL, 84 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- J.C. Richstein, C. Lorenz, K. Neuhoff, K. An Auction Story: How Simple Bids Struggle with Uncertainty. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper no. 1765 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- S.F. Tierney, T. Schatzki, R. Mukerji. Uniformpricing versus pay-as-bid in wholesale electricity markets: Does it make a difference?. New York ISO. (2008) [Google Scholar]
- L.M. Ausubel, P. Cramton. Demand reduction and inefficiency in multi-unit auctions. (2002) [Google Scholar]
- W. Hua, D. Li, H. Sun, P. Matthews, F. Meng. (2018). Stochastic environmental and economic dispatch of power systems with virtual power plant in energy and reserve markets. International journal of smart grid and clean energy., 7(4), 231–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. González, J. Villar, C.A. Díaz, F.A. Campos. Joint energy and reserve markets: Current implementations and modeling trends. Electric Power Systems Research, 109, 101–111. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Divényi, B. Polgári, Á. Sleisz, P. Sőrés, D. Raisz. Algorithm design for European electricity market clearing with joint allocation of energy and control reserves. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 111, 269–285. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.