Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2020
2020 2nd International Conference on Civil Architecture and Energy Science (CAES 2020)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Engineering, Pollution Control and Prevention
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016502005
Published online 01 May 2020
  1. Sun Jinyun, Li Tao. Entrepreneurial ecosystem: from the perspective of symbiotic evolution and organizational ecology theories [J]. Foreign Economics & Management. 2016, 38(12): 32-45. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen Lingmin, Wang Xiaoxiao, Mao Ruixin. Modelling and operational mechanism of entrepreneurial ecosystem [J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(09): 55-60; [Google Scholar]
  3. Nir Kshetri. Developing successful entrepreneurial ecosystems: Lessons from a comparison of an Asian tiger and a Baltic tiger. Baltic Journal of Management, 2014, 9(3):330-356. [Google Scholar]
  4. Erik Stam. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. Working Papers, 2015, 23(9) [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang Jin, Chen Fengwen. Development of entrepreneurial training ecosystems in universities using the EPM model [J]. Higher Education Exploration, 2019 (11): 118-123. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang Tingting & Wang Qiushi. Research on operational mechanism of entrepreneurial ecosystems [J]. Information and Communications Technology and Policy, 2019 (3): 7-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tao Qiuxiang, Tu Jiliang, Du Wei. Construction of innovation and entrepreneurship training ecosystems and regional development from the dimension of “double first-rate school development” [J]. Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Social Science edition), 2019, 21(03): 110-118. [Google Scholar]
  8. Du Dong, Hong Jingyue. Panoramic analysis and comprehensive assessment of innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystems in universities [J]. Shangdong Higher Education, 2019, 7 (1): 17-26. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu Weili, Ge Xinwei. Research on channels to develop innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystems in vocational schools [J]. The Chinese Society For Technical And Vocational Education, 2020, (01): 83-86. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li Yanyan, Huang Zhaoxin. Development and operational mechanism of intellectual entrepreneurship ecosystems [J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2017, (06):168-172. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Hongbo, Shi Huan. Research on symbiotic evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems using the extended logistic model [J]. Statistics & Decision, 2019,35(21):40-45. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li Jing, Liu Hui. Logic and direction of higher education integration in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area [J]. Research on Higher Education, 2018,39(10):31-36. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Zhenzhen, Li Qingqing, Bao Xinghua. Responsibilities and collaborative development of the government, universities, enterprises and the society in innovation and entrepreneurship training ecosystems – a comparative study between the US, Germany and Japan [J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2019, (09):182-188. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Zhanren, Ou Yuhui. Practice and Inspiration in innovation and entrepreneurship training system development from Hong Kong – A case study of Advancing CUHK Entrepreneurship Hub [J]. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education, 2017, 8(01):20-23. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang Chao, Zhang Yuguang. Research on operational strategies of innovation and entrepreneurship training systems in universities – from the angle of ecological niche [J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2019,38(01):163-166. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang Debin. Important factors of scientific entrepreneurship ecosystems – scientific development potential of Hong Kong and cooperation with four regions in mainland China [J]. Science & Technology Industry of China, 2014, (06):25-27. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.