EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 173 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 173 (2020) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 173, 2020
2020 5th International Conference on Advances on Clean Energy Research (ICACER 2020)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Solar and Photovoltaic Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017302001
Published online 09 June 2020
  1. B. Domenech, L. Ferrer-Martí, P. Lillo, R. Pastor, and J. Chiroque, “A community electrification project: Combination of microgrids and household systems fed by wind, PV or micro-hydro energies according to micro-scale resource evaluation and social constraints, ” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 23, pp. 275–285, (Dec. 2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Kasaeian, P. Rahdan, M. A. V. Rad, and W. M. Yan, “Optimal design and technical analysis of a grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic/diesel/biogas under different economic conditions: A case study, ” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 198, (Oct. 2019). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. H. Jahangir, S. A. Mousavi, and M. A. Vaziri Rad, “A techno-economic comparison of a photovoltaic/thermal organic Rankine cycle with several renewable hybrid systems for a residential area in Rayen, Iran, ” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 195, pp. 244–261, (Sep. 2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Chakir et al., “Optimal energy management for a grid connected PV-battery system, ” in Energy Reports, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Kamjo, A. Maheri, G. Putrus, A. Disqah., “Optimal sizing of grid-connected hybrid wind-pv systems with battery bank storage.” Conference: World Renewable Energy Forum (WERF), (January-2012): [Google Scholar]
  6. F. A. Khan, N. Pal, and S. H. Saeed, “Review of solar photovoltaic and wind hybrid energy systems for sizing strategies optimization techniques and cost analysis methodologies, ” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 92. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 937–947, (01-Sep-2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Maleki and A. Askarzadeh, “Artificial bee swarm optimization for optimum sizing of a stand-alone PV/WT/FC hybrid system considering LPSP concept, ” Sol. Energy, vol. 107, pp. 227–235, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Maleki and F. Pourfayaz, “Optimal sizing of autonomous hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery power system with LPSP technology by using evolutionary algorithms, ” Sol. Energy, vol. 115, pp. 471–483, May (2015). [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Wamalwa, S. M. Sichilalu, and X. Xia, “Optimal energy mix of a microhydro-wind-grid system powering a dairy farm in Western Cape, South Africa., ” in Energy Procedia, (2017), vol. 142, pp. 708–715. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Alvarez Alvarez, M. Rico-Secades, E. L Corominas, N. Huerta-Medina, and J. Soler Guitart, “Design and control strategies for a modular hydroKinetic smart grid, ” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 95, pp. 137–145, (Feb. 2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Arévalo, D. Benavides, J. Lata-García, and F. Jurado, “Energy Control and Size Optimization of a Hybrid System (Photovoltaic-Hidrokinetic) Using Various Storage Technologies, ” Sustain. Cities Soc., p. 101773, (Aug. 2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Lata-García, F. Jurado, L. M. Fernández-Ramírez, and H. Sánchez-Sainz, “Optimal hydrokinetic turbine location and techno-economic analysis of a hybrid system based on photovoltaic/hydrokinetic/hydrogen/battery, ” Energy, vol. 159, pp. 611–620, (Sep. 2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Arévalo, D. Benavides, and F. Jurado “Energy Control and sizing optimization of an off grid Hybrid System (Wind-Hydrokinetic-Diesel)” Colombian Conference on Automatic Control IEEE (IEEE-CCAC). [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Arévalo, D. Benavides, Juan Espinoza, Luis Hernández, and F. Jurado “Impact on a microgrid using different storage systems under three energy dispatch control”, Ibero-American Congress of Smart Cities (ICSC-CITIES 2019), (to be published) [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Djelailia, M. S. Kelaiaia, H. Labar, S. Necaibia, and F. Merad, “Energy hybridization photovoltaic/diesel generator/pump storage hydroelectric management based on online optimal fuel consumption per kWh, ” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 44, pp. 1–15, (Jan. 2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Badrul Salleh, N. M. Kamaruddin, and Z. Mohamed-Kassim, “Savonius hydrokinetic turbines for a sustainable river-based energy extraction: A review of the technology and potential applications in Malaysia, ” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 36, (Dec. 2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Kusakana and H. J. Vermaak, “Cost and performance evaluation of hydrokinetic-diesel hybrid systems, ” in Energy Procedia, (2014), vol. 61, pp. 2439–2442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. I. F. S. dos Santos, R. G. R. Camacho, G. L. Tiago Filho, A. C. B. Botan, and B. A. Vinent, “Energy potential and economic analysis of hydrokinetic turbines implementation in rivers: An approach using numerical predictions (CFD) and experimental data, ” Renew. Energy, vol. 143, pp. 648–662, (Dec. 2019). [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Guasch Murillo, S. Silvestre Berges, and Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d’Enginyeria Electroònica., “Modelado y anàlisis de sistemas fotovoltàicos, ” (2003). [Google Scholar]
  20. B. K. Das and F. Zaman, “Performance analysis of a PV/Diesel hybrid system for a remote area in Bangladesh: Effects of dispatch strategies, batteries, and generator selection, ” Energy, vol. 169, pp. 263–276, (Feb. 2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Agencia de Regulación y Control de Electricidad (ARCONEL), “Pliego tarifario para las empresas eléctricas de distribución codificado servicio público de energía eléctrica.” (Periodo: EneroDiciembre 2019). [Google Scholar]
  22. Agencia de Regulación y Control de Electricidad (ARCONEL), “Derogatoria-CodificacionRegulacion-001-13-generadores-energia, resolución 031/16” (Enero 2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.