Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 175, 2020
XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness – INTERAGROMASH 2020”
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 13012 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
Section | Agricultural Planning and Economics | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017513012 | |
Published online | 29 June 2020 |
- Project Management Institute Inc. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide, 2017) [Google Scholar]
- D. Muslihat, 7 Popular Project Management Methodologies And What They’re Best Suited For (2018) https://zenkit.com/en/blog/7-popular-project-managementmethodologies-and-what-theyre-best-suited-for/ [Google Scholar]
- V.I. Pishchik, Thementalityofgenerationsinfluidmodernity(scientificmonograph) (INFRA-M, Moscow, 2019) doi: 10.12737/monography_5ba0ee24675441.11909669 [Google Scholar]
- A.L. Zhuravlev, A.L., V.P. Poznyakov, Psychological journal 39(1), 15-25 (2018) doi: 10.7868/S0205959218010026 [Google Scholar]
- L. Batrancea, A. Nichita, J. Olsen, C. Kogler, S. Zukauskas, Journal of Economic Psychology 74, 102191 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.009 [Google Scholar]
- D. Fetchenhauer, O.H. Azar, G. Antonides, D. Dunning, F.R.H., S. Lea, F. Ölander, Journal of Economic Psychology 33(3), 695-699 (2012) doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.006 [Google Scholar]
- E. Kirchler, Economic psychology (Cambridge University Press, 2018) doi.org/10.1017/9781139629065 [Google Scholar]
- C. Lisciandra, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 72A, 11-21 (2018) doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.010 [Google Scholar]
- G.E. Bolton, A. Ockenfels, Journal of Economic Psychology 33(3), 665-676 (2012) doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.003 [Google Scholar]
- D. Dunning, D. Fetchenhauer, T.M. Schlösser, Journal of Economic Psychology 33(3), 686-694 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.005 [Google Scholar]
- R. Roberto Farias de Toledo, H.L. Miranda Junior, J.R. Farias Filho, H. Gomes Costa, A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and project management dataset (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104312 [Google Scholar]
- H.M. Gharaibeh, International Journal of Project Organisation and Management 8(1), 87-102 (2016) doi: 10.1504/IJPOM.2016.075785 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Pargar, J. Kujala, K. Aaltonen, S. Ruutu, International Journal of Project Management 37, 716-730 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.12.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D.P. Velayudhan, S. Thomas, International Journal of Project Organisation and Management 10(1), 82-92 (2018) doi: 10.1504/IJPOM.2018.090377 [Google Scholar]
- B.J. Galli, M. Amin Kaviani, L.A. Ocampo, International Journal of Project Organisation and Management 11(2), 110-139 (2019) doi: 10.1504/IJPOM.2019.100590 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.A. Kaifi, W.A. Nafei, N.M. Khanfar, M.M. Kaifi, International Journal of Business & Management 7(24), 88-93 (2012) doi:10.5539/ijbm.v7n24p88 [Google Scholar]
- N.M. Lebedeva, A.N. Tatarko, Culture as a factor of social progress (JSC«Justicinform», Moscow, 2009) [Google Scholar]
- V.Yu. Kotlyakov, Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University 2(54), 148-153 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- S.H. Shwartz, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (2012)http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/11 [Google Scholar]
- R.M. Nureyev, Critique of the basic premises of modern macroeconomictheories (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2014) [Google Scholar]
- A.N. Oleynik, Institutional Economics (Infra-M Publ. House, Moscow, 2012) [Google Scholar]
- J. Crusius, F. van Horen, T. Mussweiler, Journal of Economic Psychology 33, 677-685 (2011) doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.004 [Google Scholar]
- C.W. Rudolph, R.S. Rauvola, H. Zacher, The Leadership Quarterly 29(1), 44-57 (2018) doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.004 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.