Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 182, 2020
2020 10th International Conference on Power, Energy and Electrical Engineering (CPEEE 2020)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Modern Power System Control and Operation
Published online 31 July 2020
  1. KONG Xiangyu, ZHENG Feng, E Zhijun, et al, “Short-term Load Forecasting Based on Deep Belief Network[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42(5), pp. 133-139. [Google Scholar]
  2. LIUJ, GAO H,ZHAO M.A, et al, “Review and prospect of active distribution system planning[J]”, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2015, 3(4), pp. 457-467. [Google Scholar]
  3. YAO Jiangang, FU Qiang, YE Lun, et al, “Substation Capacity Planning Method Considering Influence of Peak-valley Time-of-use Power Price[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(13), pp. 53-61. [Google Scholar]
  4. LIU H, ZENG P,GUO J, et al, “An optimization strategy of controlled electric vehicle charging considering demand side response and regional wind and photovoltaic[J]”, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2015, 3(2), pp.232-239. [Google Scholar]
  5. LI Bo, MEN Deyue, YAN Yaqin, et al, “Architecture and Key Technologies for Auxiliary Decision-making System of Integrated Dispatch Scheduling[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39(1), pp.137-140. [Google Scholar]
  6. WU Qianhong, GAO Jun, HOU Guangsong, et al. “Short-term Load Forecasting Support Vector Machine Algorithm Based on Multi-source Heterogeneous Fusion of Load Factors[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(15), pp. 67-72. [Google Scholar]
  7. WU Xiaoyu, HE Jinghan, ZHANG Pei, et al, “Power System Short-term Load Forecasting Based on Improved Random Forest with Grey Relation Projection[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39(12), pp. 50-55. [Google Scholar]
  8. XIAO Bai, NIE Peng, MU Gang, et al, “A Spatial Load Forecasting Method Based on Multilevel Clustering Analysis and Support Vector Machine[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39(12), pp. 56-61. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lipton, Zachary C., Berkowitz, John, and Elkan, Charles, “A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. Justin Bayer, Daan Wierstra, Julian Togelius, and J¨urgen Schmidhuber, “Evolv-ing memory cell structures for sequence learning”, Artificial Neural Networks–ICANN 2009, pp. 755-764, Springer, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoshua Bengio, Patrice Simard, and Paolo Frasconi’ “ Learning long-term depen-dencies with gradient descent is difficult”, Neural Networks,IEEE Transactions on, 5(2), pp. 157-166, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  12. XU Longbo,WANG Wei,ZHANG Tao, et al, “Ultra-short-term Wind Power Prediction Based on Neural Network and Mean Impact Value[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(21), pp. 40-45. [Google Scholar]
  13. LIU Ruiye, HUANG Lei, “Wind Power Forecasting Based on Dynamic Neural Networks[J]”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36(11), pp. 19-22. [Google Scholar]
  14. HERNANDEZ L, BALADRON C, AGUIAR J.M, et al, “Artificial neural network for short-term load forecasting in distribution systems[J]”, Energies, 2014, 7(3), pp. 1576-1598. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bengio Y, Boulanger-Lewandowski N, Pascanu R, “Advances in Optimizing Recurrent Networks”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, 2012, pp. 8624-8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Adam Gibson, Josh Patterson, “Deep Learning: A Practitioner’s Approach [M]”, Boston:O’Reilly Media, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wim De Mulder, Steven Bethard, and Marie-Francine Moens, “A survey on the application of recurrent neural networks to statistical language modeling”, Computer Speech & Language, 30(1), pp. 61-98, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. “Hourly Load Data Archives [EB/OL]”, [2018-06-12]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.