Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 185, 2020
2020 International Conference on Energy, Environment and Bioengineering (ICEEB 2020)
Article Number 03027
Number of page(s) 5
Section Medical Biology and Medical Signal Processing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018503027
Published online 01 September 2020
  1. S. Mischinski and A. Ural, Interaction of microstructure and microcrack growth in cortical bone: a finite element study. Comput. Method Biomec., 16(1),81–94, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Gustafsson, N. Mathavan, M.J. Turunen, et al., Linking multiscale deformation to microstructure in cortical bone using in situ loading, digital image correlation and synchrotron X-ray scattering, Acta Biomaterialia, 69(15),323–331, 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Bajaj, J.R. Geissler, M.R. Allen, et al., The resistance of cortical bone tissue to failure under cyclic loading is reduced with alendronate. Bone, 64 (7): 57–64, 2014. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. F.D. Liu, H. Ding, The changes of bone biomechanical properties in osteoporosis. J Med Biomech, 32(4): 388–392, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. S.Manteghi, Z. Mahboob, Z. Fawaz, H. Bougherara, Investigation of the mechanical properties and failure modes of hybrid natural fiber composites for potential bone fracture fixation plates, J Mech. Behav. Biomed, 65, 306-316, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. F.Libonati, L.Vergani, Understanding the structure- property relationship in cortical bone to design a biomimetic composite. Composite Structures, 139(1): 188–198, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Demirtas, E. Curran, A. Ural, Assessment of the effect of reduced compositional heterogeneity on fracture resistance of human cortical bone using finite element modeling. Bone, 91, 92-101, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. N.A. Raeisi, A.R. Arshi, M.R. Eslami, et al .Haversian cortical bone model with many radial microcracks: Anelastic analytic solution. Med. Eng.Phys., 29(6): 708–717, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Liu, B. Chen, G. Lu, X. Lin. Mechanical Experiment and Microscopic Analysis on Anisotropic Properties of Cortical Bone. J. of Medical Biomechanics, 33(5): 396–401, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Zheng, X. Luo, A mathematical programming approach for frictional contact problems with the extended finite element method, Archive of Applied Mechanics, 86, 599–616, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. É. Budyn, T. Hoc, Multiple scale modeling for cortical bone fracture in tension using X-FEM[J]. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 16(2): 213–236, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A.A. Abdel-Wahab, A.R. Maligno, V.V. Silberschmidt. Micro-scale modelling of bovine cortical bone fracture: Analysis of crack propagation and microstructure using X-FEM[J]. Computational Materials Science, 52(1): 128–135, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Li, A.A. Abdel-Wahab, V.V. Silberschmidt. Analysis of fracture processes in cortical bone tissue[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 110: 448-458, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Hage, R. Hamade, Automatic Detection of Cortical Bones Haversian Osteonal Boundaries. AIMS Medical Science, 2(4): 328–346, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cowin S C (Ed.). Bone mechanics handbook, 2nd Edition[M]. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R.K. Nalla, J.H. Kinney, R.O. Ritchie, Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone. Nature materials, 2(3): 164–168, 2003. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. L.P. Mullins, V. Sassi, P.E. McHugh, et al Differences in the crack resistance of interstitial, osteonal and trabecular bone tissue. Annals of biomedical engineering, 37(12): 2574–2582, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. É. Budyn, T. Hoc, Multiple scale modeling for cortical bone fracture in tension using X-FEM[J]. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 16(2): 213–236, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. F.J. O’Brien, D. Taylor, T.C. Lee, The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks. J. Orthop. Res., 23(2): 475–480, 2005. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.