EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 185 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 185 (2020) 03040 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 185, 2020
2020 International Conference on Energy, Environment and Bioengineering (ICEEB 2020)
Article Number 03040
Number of page(s) 6
Section Medical Biology and Medical Signal Processing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018503040
Published online 01 September 2020
  1. Wood KB. Commentary of Acute and Hyperacute Thoracolumbar Corpectomy for Traumatic Burst Fractures Using a Mini-open Lateral Approach. Spine 2018;43. [Google Scholar]
  2. Garg K, Agrawal D. Role of Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery Techniques in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. The Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2019;16:33–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Korovessis P. Hidden Blood Loss in Spine Surgery for A1-A3 thoracolumbar Fractures. Comparison Between Three Approaches. Journal of Investigative Surgery 2019;32:761–2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li C, Wang J, Teng HL, et al. Unilateral Wiltse intermuscular approach and contralateral decompression for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2017;30:453–7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hammad WA, Barania MA, Alaghory IM, et al. Anterolateral Approach for Unstable Lumbar Burst Fracture with Anterior Compression. Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery 2018;08:201–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Azimi P, Azhari S, Benzel EC, et al. Evaluation of Surgical Treatment and the Relationship between Thoracolumbar Injury Severity and Classification Score and Preoperative Cross-Sectional Area in Patients with Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures. International Clinical Neuroscience Journal 2017;4:57–62. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aono H, Ishii K, Takenaka S, et al. Risk factors for a kyphosis recurrence after short-segment temporary posterior fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2019;66:138–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chung WH, Eu WC, Chiu CK, et al. Minimally invasive reduction of thoracolumbar burst fracture using monoaxial percutaneous pedicle screws: Surgical technique and report of radiological outcome. Journal of orthopaedic surgery 2020;28:2309499019888977. [Google Scholar]
  9. Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Kostuik JP. Evaluation of surgical treatment for burst fractures. Spine 1990;15:667–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA, et al. Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. Journal of Neurosurgery 1995;83:977–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wood KB, Bohn D, Mehbod A. Anterior Versus Posterior Treatment of Stable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 2005;18. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hitchon PW, Torner JC, Eichholz KM, et al. Comparison of anterolateral and posterior approaches in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Journal of Neurosurgery 2006;5:117–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sasso RC, Renkens K, Hanson D, et al. Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Anterior-Only Versus Short-Segment Posterior Fixation. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 2006;19:242–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lin B, Chen Z, Guo Z, et al. Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach With Subtotal Corpectomy, Decompression, and Reconstruction of Spine in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 2011:1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu H, Fu C, Yu W, et al. The options of the three different surgical approaches for the treatment of Denis type A and B thoracolumbar burst fracture. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 2014;24:29–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sudo H, Ito M, Kaneda K, et al. Anterior decompression and strut graft versus posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation with vertebroplasty for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse with neurologic deficits. The Spine Journal 2013;13:1726–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu H, Wang C, Gu C, et al. Comparison of three different surgical approaches for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. Chinese journal of traumatology 2013;16:31–5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang J, Liu P. Analysis of surgical approaches for unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture: minimum of five year follow-up. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 2015;65:201–5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Garg M, Kumar A, Singh PK, et al. Single-Stage Transpedicular Approach for Circumferential Arthrodesis in Traumatic Lumbar Vertebral Body Burst Fractures. The Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2019;16:14–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Panteliadis P, Musbahi O, Muthian S, et al. A Comparison of Three Different Methods of Fixation in the Management of Thoracolumbar Fractures. The International Journal of Spine Surgery 2017;12:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhou CH, Long HG, Tan J, et al. [Clinical application of extracorporeal pneumatic reduction combined with bone-filled mesh bag implantation for the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic burst fracture without spinal cord injury]. China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019;32:604. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liang C, Liu B, Zhang W, et al. Clinical Effects of Posterior Limited Long-Segment Pedicle Instrumentation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures. Journal of Investigative Surgery 2020;33:25–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.