Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 194, 2020
2020 5th International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2020)
Article Number 03010
Number of page(s) 5
Section Power Engineering and Power Generation Technology
Published online 15 October 2020
  1. IEA (2017): CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shan Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Xu X, Shao S, Wang P, Guan D (2016): New provincial CO 2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors. Applied Energy 184, 742-750 [Google Scholar]
  3. Yan H (2015): Provincial energy intensity in China: The role of urbanization. Energy Policy 86, 635-650 [Google Scholar]
  4. Rafiq S, Salim R, Nielsen I (2016): Urbanization, openness, emissions and energy intensity: A study of increasingly urbanized emerging economies. Energy Economics 56, 20-28 [Google Scholar]
  5. Belloumi M, Alshehry A (2016): The Impact of Urbanization on Energy Intensity in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 8, 375 [Google Scholar]
  6. Elliott RJR, Sun P, Zhu T (2017): The direct and indirect effect of urbanization on energy intensity: A province-level study for China. Energy 123, 677-692 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagayev I, Najman B (2014): Money to fill the gap? Local financial development and energy intensity in Europe and Central Asia. MPRA Paper No. 55193 4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Adom PK, Appiah MO, Agradi MP (2019): Does financial development lower energy intensity? Frontiers in Energy [Google Scholar]
  9. Hussain HI, Slusarczyk B, Kamarudin F, Thaker HMT, Szczepańska-Woszczyna K (2020): An Investigation of an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System to Predict the Relationship among Energy Intensity, Globalization, and Financial Development in Major ASEAN Economies. Energies 13, 850 [Google Scholar]
  10. Rathnayaka RMKT, Seneviratna DMKN, Long W (2018): The dynamic relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 13, 264-268 [Google Scholar]
  11. Harris RDF, Tzavalis E (1999): Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics 91, 201-226 [Google Scholar]
  12. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003): Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Advances in Econometrics 115, 53-75 [Google Scholar]
  13. Choi I (2001): Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 20, 249-272 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levin A, Lin C-F, Chu C-SJ (2002): Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24 [Google Scholar]
  15. Pedroni P (2004): Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20, 597-625 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012): Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 29, 1450-1460 [Google Scholar]
  17. Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017): Energy consumption, CO 2 emissions, and economic growth: An ethical dilemma. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68, 808-824 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.