Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 197, 2020
75th National ATI Congress – #7 Clean Energy for all (ATI 2020)
Article Number 08015
Number of page(s) 12
Section Environmental Sustainability and Renewable Energy Sources
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019708015
Published online 22 October 2020
  1. «XFoil User Guide,» [Online]. Available: http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil. last access april 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Burton, N. Jenkins, D. Sharpe and E. Bossanyi, Wind Energy Handbook, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Swalwell, J. Sheridan and W. Melbourne, “Frequency analysis of surface pressures on an airfoil after stall,” in 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Balduzzi, et al., “Static and dynamic analysis of a NACA 0021 airfoil section at low Reynolds numbers based on experiments and CFD,” in ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2018, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Holst, et al., “Static and Dynamic Analysis of a NACA 0021 Airfoil Section at Low Reynolds Numbers: Drag and Moment Coefficients,” in ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Holst, et al., «Experimental Analysis of a NACA 0021 Airfoil Under Dynamic Angle of Attack Variation and Low Reynolds Numbers,» Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 141, n. 3, 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Holst, et al., “Experimental Analysis of a NACA 0021 Airfoil Section Through 180-Deg Angle of Attack at Low Reynolds Numbers for Use in Wind Turbine Analysis,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 141, no. 4, 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. F. Melani, F. Balduzzi, G. Ferrara and A. Bianchini, “An annotated database of low Reynolds aerodynamic coefficients for the NACA0021 airfoil,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2191, no. 1, AIP Publishing LLC, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. E. Swalwell, J. Sheridan and W. H. Melbourne, “The effect of turbulence intensity on stall of the NACA 0021 aerofoil,” in 14th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. K. A. Weinman, H. Ven, C. R. Mockett, T. A. Knopp, J. C. Kok, R. T. Perrin and F. H. Thiele, “A study of grid convergence issues for the simulation of the massively separated flow around a stalled airfoil using DES and related methods,” 2006. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. B. Streher, “Large-eddy simulations of the flow around a NACA0012 airfoil at different angles of attack,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.01576, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Drela, “XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils,” in Low Reynolds number aerodynamics, Springer, 1989, pp. 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. N. Jacobs, «The aerodynamic characteristics of eight very thick airfoils from tests in the variable density wind tunnel,» NACA Technical Report, 1932. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. E. Sheldahl and P. C. Klimas, “Aerodynamic characteristics of seven symmetrical airfoil sections through 180-degree angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines,” Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA), 1981. [Google Scholar]
  15. F. R. Menter, “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications,” AIAA journal, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598-1605, 1994. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. R. Menter, M. Kuntz and R. Langtry, “Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model,” Turbulence, heat and mass transfer, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 625-632, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. B. Langtry and F. R. Menter, “Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes,” AIAA journal, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2894-2906, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Nicoud and F. Ducros, “Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor,” Flow, turbulence and Combustion, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 183-200, 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.