Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 200, 2020
The 1st Geosciences and Environmental Sciences Symposium (ICST 2020)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Disaster Risk Reduction
Published online 23 October 2020
  1. S. R. Brown, Qual. Health Res., 6, 4:561–567 (1996), doi: 10.1177/104973239600600408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Akhtar-Danesh N. Mirza, Open J. Soc. Sci., 5, 3:198–204 (2017), doi: 10.4236/jss.2017.53017. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie, I. Newman, S. Ramlo, Using Q Methodology and Q Factor Analysis in Mixed Methods Research. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. S.R. Brown, Operant Subj., 16, 3/4:91–138 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Shinebourne, Int. J. Qual. Methods, 8, 1:93–97 (2009), doi: 10.1177/160940690900800109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S.E. Ramlo, AIP Conf. Proc., 1064:179–182 (2008), doi: 10.1063/1.3021248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J.B. Nicholas, Reliability in Q Methodology: A Case Study, In: The Eastern Education Research Association Annual Conference, 1–20 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Nazariadli, D.B. Morais, S. Supak, P.K. Baran, K. S. Bunds, Methodol. Innov., 12, 1, p. 205979911983219, (2019), doi: 10.1177/2059799119832194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B.H. Reber, S.E. Kaufman, F. Cropp, Operant Subj., 23, 4:192–209 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Delaitre, C. Lavandier, R. Dedieu, N. Gey, Meaning of quiet areas in urban context through people viewpoints, In the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference, 2133–2138 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Schmolck, PQMethod Software, 2020. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 08-Mar-2020]. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Zabala, RJ., 6, 2:163–173 (2014), doi: 10.32614/rj-2014-032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L.S. Bashatah, J. Res. Method Educ., 6, 5:37–43 (2016), doi: 10.9790/7388-0605053743. [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Webler, S. Danielson, S. Tuler, Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research. Greenfield, MA, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Newman, S. Ramlo, Using Q Methodology and Q Factor Analysis in Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Pruneddu, Q-SORTWARE. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 16-Dec-2019]. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Banasick, J. Open Source Softw., 4, 36:1360 (2019), doi: 10.21105/joss.01360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Nijnik, D. Miller, A. Nijnik, J. Settlements Spat. Plan., 2:185–190 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. T.C. Du Plessis, A Theoretical Framework of Corporate Online Communication: A Marketing Public Relations (MPR) Perspective, University of south Africa, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Abdi L. J. Williams, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat., 2, 4:433–459 (2010), doi: 10.1002/wics.101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Ramlo, Mid-Western Educ. Res., 28, 1:73–92 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Watts P. Stenner, Qual. Res. Psychol., 2, 1:67–91 (2005), doi: 10.1191/1478088705qp022oa. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. P. Mishra et al., International J. Livest. Res., 7, 5:60–78 (2017), doi:10.5455/ijlr.20170415115235. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Hidayat, Asumsi Analisis Faktor dengan SPSS, Statistikian, 2014. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 08-Mar-2020]. [Google Scholar]
  25. B.B. McBride, C.A. Brewer, A.R. Berkowitz, W.T. Borrie, Ecosphere, 4, 5 (2013), doi: 10.1890/ES13-00075.1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.