Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 200, 2020
The 1st Geosciences and Environmental Sciences Symposium (ICST 2020)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020002003
Published online 23 October 2020
  1. I.A. Shiklomanov. World freshwater resources In Gleick P.H. (Ed.). Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources (Oxford University Press, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  2. X. Zhang, Front. Environ. Sci, 3, 59 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Benjmel, F. Amraoui, S. Boutaleb, M. Ouchchen, A. Tahiri, A. Touab, Water 12, 471 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Rejekiningrum, Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan 3, 2 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Goldman and F.M. Neubaur, Surveys in Geophysics, 15 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Rubin and S. Hubbard, Hydrogeophysics (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S.A.W. Araffa, Geophysical Journal International, 192, 1 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. S.A.S. Araffa, M.I. Mohamadin, H.S. Sabet and M.S. Takey, NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics 8, 1 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Arsene, B.W.W. Elvis, G. Daniel, N.M. Theophile, K. Kelian, N.J. Daniel, International Journal of Geophysics 2018 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Wilopo, D.P.E. Putra, R. Susatio, Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 7, 4 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Hasan, Y.J. Shang, W.J. Jin, G. Akhter, Journal of Mountain Science 16, 4 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Hasan, Y. Shang, G. Akhter and W. Jin, Water 10, 11 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Vann, A. Puttiwongrak, T. Suteerasak, W. Koedsin, Water 12, 506 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Nagy, A.T. Akács, T. Huszák, A. Mahler, G. Varga, Comparison of permeability testing methods, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. U. Sahin, Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 200 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. M.J. Hvorslev, Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Ground-Water Observations, Bull. No. 36, (Waterways Exper. Sta. Corps of Engrs, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, Mississippi, 1951). [Google Scholar]
  17. W.D. Reynolds, Eng. Geol. 185, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  18. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tegal, Kabupaten Tegal Dalam Angka 2019, (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tegal, Kabupaten Tegal 2019). [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Kirsch, Groundwater Geophysics: A Tool for Hydrogeology (Springer-Verlag, 2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Goldman and F.M. Neubauer, Surveys in Geophysics, 15 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Bouwer and R.C. Rice, 1976. Water Resources Research, 12, 3 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  22. R.I. Imael, Slug Test in Unconfined Aquifers, (Master’s Theses, Western Michigan University, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  23. C.W. Fetter, Applied Hydrogeology (PranticeHall, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  24. R.J.M. de Wiest, Groundwater Hydrology, (Academic Press, 1969). [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Turc., Le bilan d’eau des sols. Relations entre les précipitations, l’évaporation et l’écoulement. Annales Agronomiques 5, 491 (1954). [Google Scholar]
  26. P.B.S. Sarma, J.W. Delleur, A.R. Rao, A Program in Urban Hydrology Part II: An Evaluation of Rainfall-Runoff for Small Urbanized Watersheds and the Effect of Urbanization on Runoff, (IWRRC Technical Reports Paper 8, 1969). [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Djuri, H. Samodra, T.C. Amin dan S. Gafoer, Peta Geologi Lembar Purwokerto dan Tegal, Jawa, (Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi, Bandung, Indonesia, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  28. D.K. Todd and L.M. Mays, L.M., Groundwater Hydrology, (John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2005). [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Setiono, H. Pudjiardjo, W. Hidajat, Geological Engineering E-Journal 6, 2 (2014). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.