EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 202 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 202 (2020) 15017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2020
The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020)
Article Number 15017
Number of page(s) 5
Section Smart Information System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020215017
Published online 10 November 2020
  1. S. Bernius, “The impact of open access on the management of scientific knowledge,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 583–603, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Willinsky, The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge: MIT Press, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Steele, “Open access in Australia: An odyssey of sorts?,” Insights UKSG J., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 282–289, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Henty, “Ten major issues in providing a repository service in Australian universities,” D-Lib Mag., vol. 13, no. 5–6, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Gaulé and N. Maystre, “Getting cited: Does open access help?,” Res. Policy, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1332–1338, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Koler-Povh, P. Južnič, and G. Turk, “Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering,” Scientometrics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 1033–1045, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. B. S. Jean, S. Y. Rieh, E. Yakel, and K. Markey, “Unheard voices: Institutional repository end-users,” Coll. Res. Libr., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 21–42, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Valentine Stanton and C. Li Liew, “Open access theses in institutional repositories: an exploratory study of the perceptions of doctoral students,” Inf. Res., vol. 16, no. 4, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  9. J. W. Cresswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Marshall and G. B. Rossman, Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Chaudhuri and M. Thohira, “Usage of Open-Access Journals: Findings from Eleven Top Science and Medical Journals,” Ser. Libr., vol. 58, no. 1–4, pp. 97–105, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Williamson, V. Bernath, S. Wright, and J. Sullivan, “Research Students in the Electronic Age: Impacts of Changing Information Behavior on Information Literacy Needs,” Comminfolit, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 47, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Green and P. Macauley, “Doctoral students’ engagement with information: An American-Australian perspective,” Portal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 317–332, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Bruce, Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: AUSLIBPress, (1997). [Google Scholar]
  15. R. K. Yin, Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press, (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.