Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 203, 2020
Ecological and Biological Well-Being of Flora and Fauna (EBWFF-2020)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Veterinary Well-Being of Fauna
Published online 05 November 2020
  1. G. A. Nozdrin, A. B. Ivanova, A. G. Nozdrin Probiotics based on Bacillus subtilis and their role in the health of animals of different species, Siberian Bulletin of agricultural science, 1,7, 64-68 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Gedek Probiotics in animal feeding, Effects of performance and animal health, 8, 21-23 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.F. Khalid, M.A. Shahzad, M. Sarwar, A.U. Rehman, M. Sharif, N. Mukhtar Probiotics and lamb performance: a review, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(23), 5198-5203.(2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. N. Panin, N. I. Malik Probiotics as an integral component of rational animal feeding Veterinary science, 7, 3-6 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.M. Saleem, A.I. Zanouny, A.M. Singer Growth performance, nutrients digestibility, and blood metabolites of lambs fed diets supplemented with probiotics during pre- and post-weaning period Asian-Australasian, Journal Of Animal Sciences, 30(4), 523-530 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. B. T. Stegny, S. A. Guzhvinskaya Prospects for the use of probiotics in animal farming, Veterinary science, 11, 24 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Curro, G. Ianiro, S. Pecere, S. Bibbo, and G. Cammarota Probiotics, fibre and herbal medicinal products for functional and inflammatory bowel disorders, British Journal of Pharmacology, 174(11), 1426-1449 (2017) doi: 10.1111/bph.13632. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. H.H. Musa, S.L. Wu, C.H. Zhu The potential benefits of probiotics in animal production and health, Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(2), 313-321. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. S.B. Stefanov, N.S. Kukharenko Accelerated method of quantitative comparison of morphological features: scientific and methodological recommendations 28 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  10. A.D. Tretyakov Veterinary legislation 4, 671(1988) [Google Scholar]
  11. N.S. Kukharenko, F.O. Fyodorova, M.Yu. Shchelkanov Response of farm animals to transport stress and its correction with probiotics South of Russia: Ecology, Development, 14, 2, 87-98 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. N. S. Kukharenko, A.O. Fedorova Development of young animals in the post-fetal period from cows imported from other regions, Ekoloji: Foundation Environmental Protection & Research-FEPR Received, 27, 106, 293-299 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. V. N. Nikulin, I. N. Boyko, T. E. Palagina, A. B. Shamraev Probiotics as regulators of metabolic processes, News of the Orenburg State Agrarian University,1, 5-1, 139-142 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. V. Nekrasov, A. G. Chabaev, N. I. Anisova Probiotic of a new generation in cow feeding Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agro-Industrial Complex, 3, 38 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. N. I. Kuznetsov, T. I. Elizarova, A. B. Brunner Increasing the productivity of sows and young pigs when using, Intestevit Bulletin of the Voronezh State Agrarian University, 9, 144-148 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  16. N. V. Danilevskaya Pharmacological aspects of the use of probiotics, Veterinary science, 11, 18. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  17. L. N. Skvortsova, D. V. Osepchuk, H. A. Pyshmantseva Efficiency of using probiotics of domestic production in growing broiler chickens, 5, 18-19. (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.