Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 2020
2nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Keynote Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020501002
Published online 18 November 2020
  1. C.F. Williams, M.J. Reed, R.H. Mariner, J. DeAngelo and S.P. Galanis, Jr., Assessment of moderate- and high-temperature geothermal resources of the United States, U.S.G. Survey, Editor. 2008. p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Augustine, Update to Enhanced Geothermal System Resource Potential Estimate. GRC Transactions, 2016. 40: p. 6. [Google Scholar]
  3. T.J. Kneafsey, D. P.F., J.B. Ajo-Franklin, Y. Guglielmi, C.A. Valladao, D.A. Blankenship, P.C. Schwering, H.A. Knox, M.D. White, T.C. Johnson, C.E. Strickland, V.R. Vermuel, J.P. Morris, P. Fu, E. Mattson, G.H. Neupane, R.K. Podgorney, T.W. Doe, L. Huang, L.P. Frash, A. Ghassemi, W. Roggenthen and the EGS Collab Team, EGS Collab Project: Status, Tests, and Data, in 53rd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. 2019: New York, NY, USA. p. 19. [Google Scholar]
  4. J.W. Tester, B.J. Anderson, D.D. Blackwell, R. DiPippo, E. M. Drake, J. Garnish, B. Livesay, M.C. Moore, K. Nichols, S. Petty, M.N. Toksoz and J. R. W. Veatch, The Future of Geothermal Energy, Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century. 2006, INEL/EXT-06-11746, MIT/DOE (2006). p. 372. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Moore, J. McLennan, R. Allis, K. Pankow, S. Simmons, R. Podgorney, P. Wannamaker, J. Bartley, C. Jones and W. Rickard, The Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE): An International Laboratory for Enhanced Geothermal System Technology Development, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Knox, P. Fu, J. Morris, Y. Guglielmi, V. Vermeul, J. Ajo-Franklin, C. Strickland, T. Johnson, P. Cook, C. Herrick, M. Lee and the EGS Collab Team, Fracture and Flow Designs for the Collab/Sigma-V Project in GRC Transactions, Vol. 41, 2017 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. J.P. Morris, P. Fu, P. Dobson, J. Ajo-Franklin, T.J. Kneafsey, H. Knox, D. Blankenship, M.D. White, J. Burghardt, T.W. Doe and the EGS Collab Team, Experimental Design for Hydrofracturing and Fluid Flow at the DOE EGS Collab Testbed, in 52nd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. 2018, American Rock Mechanics Association: Seattle, Washington. p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  8. J.P. Morris, P. Fu, P. Dobson, J. Ajo-Franklin, T.J. Kneafsey, H. Knox, D. Blankenship, M.D. White, J. Burghardt, T.W. Doe and Egs Collab Team, Experimental Design for Hydrofracturing and Fluid Flow at the DOE EGS Collab Testbed, in 52nd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. 2018, American Rock Mechanics Association: Seattle, Washington. p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  9. C.M. Oldenburg, P.F. Dobson, Y. Wu, P.J. Cook, T.J. Kneafsey, S. Nakagawa, C. Ulrich, D.L. Siler, Y. Guglielmi, J. Ajo-Franklin, J. Rutqvist, T.M. Daley, J.T. Birkholzer, H.F. Wang, N.E. Lord, B.C. Haimson, H. Sone, P. Vigilante, W.M. Roggenthen, T.W. Doe, M.Y. Lee, M. Ingraham, H. Huang, E.D. Mattson, J. Zhou, T.J. Johnson, M.D. Zoback, J.P. Morris, J.A. White, P.A. Johnson, D.D. Coblentz and J. Heise, Hydraulic fracturing experiments at 1500 m depth in a deep mine: Highlights from the kISMET project, in 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2017: Stanford University. p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Q. Zhou, C.M. Oldenburg, T.J. Kneafsey and the EGS Collab Team, Modeling Transport of Multiple Tracers in Hydraulic Fractures at the EGS Collab Test Site, in PROCEEDINGS, 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2018: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  11. T.W. Doe, R. McLaren and W. Dershowitz, Discrete Fracture Network Simulations of Enhanced Geothermal Systems, in 39th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2014: Stanford University. p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Fu, M. Schoenball, J. Morris, J. Ajo-Franklin, H. Knox, T. Kneafsey, J. Burghardt, M. White and the EGS Collab Team, Microseismic Signatures of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Preliminary Interpretation of Intermediate-Scale Data from the EGS Collab Experiment, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. White, T. Johnson, T. Kneafsey, D. Blankenship, P. Fu, H. Wu, A. Ghassemi, J. Lu, H. Huang, G. Neupane, C. Oldenburg, C. Doughty, B. Johnston, P. Winterfeld, R. Pollyea, R. Jayne, A. Hawkins, Y. Zhang and the EGS Collab Team, The Necessity for Iteration in the Application of Numerical Simulation to EGS: Examples from the EGS Collab Test Bed 1, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Winterfeld, B. Johnston, K. Beckers, Y.-S. Wu and the EGS Collab Team, Code Modifications for Modeling Chemical Tracers and Embedded Natural Fractures at EGS Collab, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Wu, P. Fu, J.P. Morris, E.D. Mattson, A.J. Hawkins, Y. Zhang, R.R. Settgast, F.J. Ryerson and the EGS Collab Team, Characterizing Fracture Flow in EGS Collab Experiment Based on Stochastic Modeling of Tracer Recovery, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Wu, P. Fu, J.P. Morris, R.R. Settgast, F.J. Ryerson and the EGS Collab Team, A Numerical Scheme to Reduce Numerical Diffusion for Advection-Dispersion Modeling: Validation and Application, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Chen, L. Huang, M. Schoenball, J. Ajo-Franklin, T. Kneafsey and the EGS Collab Team, Real-Time Microearthquake Event Detection and Location in Anisotropic Media Using a Multiscale Scanning Approach for EGS Collab Experiments in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  18. L.P. Frash, J.W. Carey, N.J. Welch and the EGS Collab Team, EGS Collab Experiment 1: Geomechanical and Hydrological Properties by Triaxial Direct Shear, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Huang, G.H. Neupane, R. Podgorney, E. Mattson and the EGS Collab Team, Mechanistically Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation and Interaction with Natural Fractures at EGS-Collab Site in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Johnson, C. Strickland, H. Knox, J. Thomle, V. Vermuel, C. Ulrich, T. Kneafsey, D. Blankenship and the EGS Collab Team, EGS Collab Project Electrical Resistivity Tomography Characterization and Monitoring Status, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Lu and A. Ghassemi, Coupled THMS Modeling of Fractured Reservoir Stimulation with Application to EGS Collab, in 44rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Mattson, Y. Zhang, A. Hawkins, T. Johnson, J. Ajo-Franklin, G. Neupane and the EGS Collab Team, Preliminary Collab Fracture Characterization Results from Flow and Tracer Testing Efforts in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  23. W. Pan, L. Huang, K. Gao, J. Ajo-Franklin, T.J. Kneafsey and the EGS Collab Team, Anisotropic Full-Waveform Inversion and Least-Squares Reverse-Time Migration of CASSM Data for Experiment I of the EGS Collab Project in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Schoenball, J. Ajo-Franklin, D. Blankenship, P. Cook, P. Dobson, Y. Guglielmi, P. Fu, T. Kneafsey, H. Knox, P. Petrov, M. Robertson, P. Schwering, D. Templeton, C. Ulrich, T. Wood and the EGS Collab Team, Microseismic monitoring of mesoscale stimulations for the DOE EGS Collab project at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Templeton, J. Morris, M. Schoenball, T. Wood, M. Robertson, P. Cook, P. Dobson, C. Ulrich, J. Ajo-Franklin, T. Kneafsey, P. Schwering, D. Blankenship, H. Knox and EGS Collab Team, Microseismic Correlation and Cluster Analysis of DOE EGS Collab Data, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Weers and J. Huggins, Getting Data Out of the Ground: Modern Challenges Facing EGS Collab, the DOE Geothermal Data Repository, and the Geothermal Industry, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [Google Scholar]
  27. Z. Ye, A. Vachaparampil, X. Zhou, A. Ghassemi and T. Kneafsey, Failure Behavior of the Poorman Schist and Its Fractures from EGS Collab Stimulation Site, in 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2019: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. White, P. Fu, H. Huang, A. Ghassemi and the EGS Collab Team, The Role of Numerical Simulation in the Design of Stimulation and Circulation Experiments for the EGS Collab Project in GRC Transactions, Vol. 41, 2017 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Y. Guglielmi, F. Cappa, H. Lançon, J.B. Janowczyk, J. Rutqvist, C.F. Tsang and J.S.Y. Wang, ISRM Suggested Method for Step-Rate Injection Method for Fracture In-Situ Properties (SIMFIP): Using a 3-Components Borehole Deformation Sensor, in The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007–2014, R. Ulusay, Editor. 2013, Springer-Verlag: Wein. [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Guglielmi, F. Cappa, J.-P. Avouac, P. Henry and D. Elsworth, Seismicity triggered by fluid injection– induced aseismic slip. Science, 2015. 348(6240): p. 1224. [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Mattson, G. Neupane, A. Hawkins, J. Burghardt, M. Ingraham, M. Plummer and the EGS Collab Team, Fracture Tracer Injection Response to Pressure Perturbations at an Injection Well. GRC Transactions, 2019. 43: p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  32. M.D. White, P. Fu, A. Ghassemi, H. Huang, J. Rutqvist, B. Johnston and the EGS Collab Team, Numerical Simulation Applications in the Design of EGS Collab Experiment 1, in PROCEEDINGS, 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2018: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Fu, M. White, J. Morris, T. Kneafsey and E.C. Team, Predicting Hydraulic Fracture Trajectory Under the Influence of a Mine Drift in EGS Collab Experiment I, in PROCEEDINGS, 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2018: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  34. J.B. Ajo-Franklin, M. Schoenball, T. Wood, M. Robertson, P. Petrov, L. Huang, T.J. Kneafsey, P. Schwering, D. Blankenship, H. Knox and E.C. Team, Imaging Hydraulic Fracture Propagation Using Semi-Permanent Continuous Active Seismic Source Monitoring: Results from the DOE EGS Collab Experiment, in American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting 2018. 2018, American Geophysical Union: Washington DC. [Google Scholar]
  35. B. Chi, L. Huang, K. Gao, J. Ajo-Franklin, T.J. Kneafsey and the EGS Collab Team, Anisotropic Imaging of Created Fractures in EGS Collab Experiments Using CASSM Data, in 45th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2020: Stanford University, Stanford, California. p. 6. [Google Scholar]
  36. Y. Zhang, C. Doughty, L. Pan, T. Kneafsey and Egs Collab Team, What Could We See at the Production Well Before the Thermal Breakthrough?, in PROCEEDINGS, 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2018: Stanford University, Stanford, California. [Google Scholar]
  37. K. Gao, L. Huang, H.A. Knox, P.C. Schwering, C.R. Hoots, J. Ajo-Franklin, T. Kneafsey and the EGS Collab Team, Anisotropic Elastic Properties of the First EGS Collab Testbed Revealed from the Campaign Cross-Borehole Seismic Data, in 45th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2020: Stanford University, Stanford, California. p. 11. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.