Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 2020
2nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 5
Section CO2 Sequestration and Deep Geothermal Energy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020502002
Published online 18 November 2020
  1. Beck M (2019) Conceptual approaches for the analysis of coupled hydraulic and geomechanical processes. PhD Thesis, Stuttgart University [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck M, Class H (2019) Modelling fault reactivation with characteristic stress-drop terms. In: Advances in Geosciences. Copernicus GmbH, pp 1–7 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck M, Seitz G, Class H (2016) Volume-Based Modelling of Fault Reactivation in Porous Media Using a Visco-Elastic Proxy Model. Transp Porous Media 114:505–524 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0663-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berre I, Boon W, Flemisch B, Fumagalli A, Gläser D, Keilegavlen E, Scotti A, Stefansson I, Tatomir A (2018) Call for participation: Verification benchmarks for single-phase flow in three-dimensional fractured porous media. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06926 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berre I, Boon WM, Flemisch B, Fumagalli A, Glaser D, Keilegavlen E, Scotti A, Stefansson I, Brenner K, Burbulla S, Devloo P, Favino M, Hennicker J, Lee I-H, Masson R, Mosthaf K, Chiara MG, Ni C-F, Nikitin K, Schadle P, Svyatskiy D, Yanbarisov R, Zulian P (2020a) Verification benchmarks for single-phase flow in three-dimensional fractured porous media. Adv Water Resour Rev 51 [Google Scholar]
  6. Berre I, Boon WM, Flemisch B, Fumagalli A, Gläser D, Keilegavlen E, Scotti A, Stefansson I, Tatomir A, Brenner K, Burbulla S, Devloo P, Duran O, Favino M, Hennicker J, Lee I-H, Lipnikov K, Masson R, Mosthaf K, Nestola MGC, Ni C-F, Nikitin K, Schädle P, Svyatskiy D, Yanbarisov R, Zulian P (2020b) Verification benchmarks for single-phase flow in three-dimensional fractured porous media. ArXiv200207005 Cs Math [Google Scholar]
  7. Class H, Ebigbo A, Helmig R, Dahle HK, Nordbotten JM, Celia MA, Audigane P, Darcis M, Ennis-King J, Fan Y, Flemisch B, Gasda SE, Jin M, Krug S, Labregere D, Naderi Beni A, Pawar RJ, Sbai A, Thomas SG, Trenty L, Wei L (2009) A benchmark study on problems related to CO2 storage in geologic formations : Summary and discussion of the results (Original paper). Comput Geosci 13:409–434 [Google Scholar]
  8. Darcis MY (2013) Coupling models of different complexity for the simulation of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers. Heft 218. Ph. D Thesis, University of Stuttgart [Google Scholar]
  9. Ebigbo A, Class H, Helmig R (2007) CO2 leakage through an abandoned well: problem-oriented benchmarks. Comput Geosci 11:103–115 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-006-9033-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Figueiredo B, Tsang C-F, Niemi A (2020) The influence of coupled thermo-mechanical processes on the pres-sure and temperature due to cold water injection into multiple fracture zones in deep rock formation [Google Scholar]
  11. Flemisch B, Berre I, Boon W, Fumagalli A, Schwenck N, Scotti A, Stefansson I, Tatomir A (2018) Benchmarks for single-phase flow in fractured porous media. Adv Water Resour 111:239–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.036 [Google Scholar]
  12. Flemisch B, Darcis M, Erbertseder K, Faigle B, Lauser A, Mosthaf K, Müthing S, Nuske P, Tatomir A, Wolff M, Helmig R (2011) DuMux: DUNE for multi-{phase, component, scale, physics, …} flow and transport in porous media. Adv Water Resour 34:1102–1112 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gläser D, Dell’Oca A, Tatomir A, Bensabat J, Class H, Guadagnini A, Helmig R, McDermott C, Riva M, Sauter M (2016) An Approach Towards a FEP-based Model for Risk Assessment for Hydraulic Fracturing Operations. Energy Procedia 97:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.030 [Google Scholar]
  14. Holzbecher E (2013) Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Modelling of Deep Geothermal Heat Production. In: Poromechanics V. American Society of Civil Engineers, Vienna, Austria, pp 1913–1922 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rutqvist, J., Rinaldi, A.P., Cappa, F., Moridis, G.J (2013) Modeling of fault reactivation and induced seismicity during hydraulic fracturing of shale-gas reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 107, 31–44 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schout G, Hartog N, Hassanizadeh SM, Helmig R, Griffioen J (2020) Impact of groundwater flow on methane gas migration and retention in unconsolidated aquifers. J Contam Hydrol 230:103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103619 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tatomir A, Dimache A-N, Iulian I, Sauter M (2019) Modelling of CO2 storage in geological formations with DuMux, a free-open-source numerical framework. A possible tool to assess geological storage of carbon dioxide in Romania. E3S Web Conf 85:07002 . https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198507002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tatomir A, McDermott C, Bensabat J, Class H, Edlmann K, Taherdangkoo R, Sauter M (2018) Conceptual model development using a generic Features, Events, and Processes (FEP) database for assessing the potential impact of hydraulic fracturing on groundwater aquifers. Adv Geosci 45:185–192 . https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-185-2018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tatomir AB, Tomac I, Sauter M (2016) A Parametric Sensitivity Study on CO2 Injection in Deep Saline Aquifers Accounting for Hydro-mechanical Microfracturing. Kiel, Germany, pp 223–230 [Google Scholar]
  20. Tony T. Freeman, Rick J. Chalaturnyk, Igor I. Bogdanov (2008) Fully Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Modeling by COMSOL Multiphysics, with Applications in Reservoir Geomechanical Characterization, COMSOL Conference 2008 Boston [Google Scholar]
  21. Vilarrasa V, Tatomir A, Tian L, Levchenko S, Basirat F, Carrera J, Niemi A, Sauter M (2020) Code comparison of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical processes induced by cold CO2 injection in deep saline aquifers (in preparation) [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiang Sun, Hao Luo (2018) A coupled thermal- hydraulic- mechanical- chemical (THMC) model for methane hydrate bearing sediments using COMSOL Multiphysics. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, A volume 19, pages 600-623 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.