Using transparent gelatin as a reservoir analogue in laboratory experiments on hydraulic fracturing

Andreas Michael

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202020513011

All issues

Volume 205 (2020)

E3S Web Conf., 205 (2020) 13011

References

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 205, 2020 2^nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)


Article Number		13011
Number of page(s)		2
Section		Extended Abstracts
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020513011
Published online		10 January 2022

De Pater, C.J., M.P. Cleary, T.S. Quinn, D.T. Barr, D.E. Johnson, and Weijers, L. (1994). “Experimental verification of dimensional analysis for hydraulic fracturing.” SPE Production & Facilities 9.04, 230-38. Web. [Google Scholar]
Hubbert, M. K. (1937). “Theory of scale models as applied to the study of geologic structures.” Geological Society of America Bulletin 48.10, 1459-520. Web. [Google Scholar]
Kavanagh, J.L., Menand, T. and Daniels, K.A. (2013). “Gelatine as a crustal analogue: determining elastic properties for modelling magmatic intrusions.” Tectonophysics 582, 101-11. Web. [Google Scholar]
Michael, A. (2016). Hydraulic Fracturing Optimization: Experimental Investigation of Multiple Fracture Growth Homogeneity via Perforation Cluster Distribution, Master’s Report at the University of Texas at Austin. [Google Scholar]
Michael, A. (2021). “Hydraulic fractures from nonuniform perforation cluster spacing in horizontal wells: laboratory testing on transparent gelatin.” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 104158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104158. [Google Scholar]
Wu, H., Golovin, E., Shulkin, Y., Chudnovsky, A., Dudley, J.W., and Wong, G. K. (2008). Observations of Hydraulic Fracture Initiation and Propagation in a Brittle Polymer. American Rock Mechanics Association, 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, San Fransisco, CA, June 29-July 2. OnePetro. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

[1] De Pater, C.J., M.P. Cleary, T.S. Quinn, D.T. Barr, D.E. Johnson, and Weijers, L. (1994). “Experimental verification of dimensional analysis for hydraulic fracturing.” SPE Production & Facilities 9.04, 230-38. Web. [Google Scholar]

[2] Hubbert, M. K. (1937). “Theory of scale models as applied to the study of geologic structures.” Geological Society of America Bulletin 48.10, 1459-520. Web. [Google Scholar]

[3] Kavanagh, J.L., Menand, T. and Daniels, K.A. (2013). “Gelatine as a crustal analogue: determining elastic properties for modelling magmatic intrusions.” Tectonophysics 582, 101-11. Web. [Google Scholar]

[4] Michael, A. (2016). Hydraulic Fracturing Optimization: Experimental Investigation of Multiple Fracture Growth Homogeneity via Perforation Cluster Distribution, Master’s Report at the University of Texas at Austin. [Google Scholar]

[5] Michael, A. (2021). “Hydraulic fractures from nonuniform perforation cluster spacing in horizontal wells: laboratory testing on transparent gelatin.” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 104158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104158. [Google Scholar]

[6] Wu, H., Golovin, E., Shulkin, Y., Chudnovsky, A., Dudley, J.W., and Wong, G. K. (2008). Observations of Hydraulic Fracture Initiation and Propagation in a Brittle Polymer. American Rock Mechanics Association, 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, San Fransisco, CA, June 29-July 2. OnePetro. [Google Scholar]