Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2020
Innovative Technologies in Science and Education (ITSE-2020)
Article Number 10002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Agricultural Management
Published online 04 December 2020
  1. V. Shepelev, S. Shepelev, Z. Almetova, Method of justification of the grain cleaning assembly performance. Research in Agricultural Engineering (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Kliuchnikov, Development of new method of drying at energy-saving universal dryer to improve quality of crops used in fodder production/ Engineering for Rural Development, 18, 105-111 (2019) doi: 10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N125 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Naumenko, S. Sokol, D. Filipenko, Numeric model of the grain mixture flow in a cylindrical sieve which revolves around the inclined axis. INMATEH - Agricultural Engineering, 56(3), 67-74 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Chrigui, A. Hidouri, A. Sadiki, J. Janicka, Unsteady Euler/Lagrange simulation of a confined bluff-body gas–solid turbulent flow. Fluid Dynamics Research, 45(5), 1–27 (2013) doi: 10.1088/0169-5983/45/5/055501 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. D. Shepelev, V. D. Shepelev, Z. V. Almetova, N. P. Shepeleva, M. V. Cheskidov, Modeling the Technological Process for Harvesting of Agricultural Produce. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 115(1), 012053 (2018) doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/115/1/012053 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Bracacescu, P. Gageanu, G. Bunduch, A. Zaica, Considerations on technical equipment used for cleaning and sorting seed mixtures based on aerodynamic principle. Engineering for Rural Development, 17, 39-44 (2018) doi: 10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N044. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Shepelev, V. Shepelev, Z. Almetova, Optimization of Technical Equipment for Crop Sowing Processes. Procedia Engineering (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Butovchenko, A. Doroshenko, A. Kol’Cov, V. Serdyuk, Comparative analysis of the functioning of sieve modules for grain cleaning machines E3S Web of Conferences, 135, 01081 (2019) doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913501081 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. A. Folami, E. N. Obioha, A. Adewole, Performance evaluation of a developed rice-processing machine. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 47(3), 506, 171-176 (2016) doi: 10.4081/jae.2016.506 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. D. Shepelev, M. V. Cheskidov, I. Yu Novikova, F. N. Grakov, N. A. Kuznetsov, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2019) DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/115/1/012053 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Grishkov, E. Chebotarev, A. Boiko, Selection and justification of the design of polymer sieves of air-sieve machines. E3S Web of Conferences, 126, 00034 (2019) doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/201912600034. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. A. Rakhmanin, A. V. Zuev, A. Y. Petrov, A. A. Aksenov, M. H. Nguyen, The investigation of absolute flow non-uniform velocity distributions influence at the centrifugal compressor axial radial impeller inlet using numerical calculation methods in ANSYS CFX. E3S Web of Conferences, 140, 05008 (2020) DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201914005008. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Alletto, M. Breuer, One-way, two-way and four-way coupled LES predictions of a particle-laden turbulent flow at high mass loading downstream of a confined bluff body. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 45, 70–90 (2012) doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.05.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Greifzu, C. Kratzsch, T. Forgber, F. Lindner, R. Schwarze, Assessment of particle-tracking models for dispersed particle-laden flows implemented in OpenFOAM and ANSYS FLUENT, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 10(1), 30-43 (2016) doi: 10.1080/19942060.2015.1104266 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. W.-F. Yang, C. Qiang, F. Wang, L. Li, W. Deng, X. Zhang, Three-dimensional CFD simulations to study the effect of impeller geometry on internal flow field in ADS upward spiral flow target, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 55(12), 1381-1392 (2018) doi: 10.1080/00223131.2018.1512424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.