Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2020
Innovative Technologies in Science and Education (ITSE-2020)
Article Number 18036
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental Education
Published online 04 December 2020
  1. G. Dudeney, N. Hocklay, M. Pegrum, Digital Literacies. Pearson Education LTD. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Warschauer, Language and the Digital Divide. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (2012) (Last accessed 22. 07.2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Fleaca, R. D. Stanciu, Digital-age Learning and Business Engineering Education – a Pilot Study on Students’ E-skills. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1051–1057 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.320 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Boelens, B. De Wever, M. Voet, Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Jowsey, G. Foster, P. Cooper-Ioelu, S. Jacobs, Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 44 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. P. Lima, L. M. Passerino, R. V. B. Henriques, M. Bercht, Asistranto: An Assistive Educational Platform for Promotion of Interest in Autistic Children. Procedia Computer Science, 160, 385-393 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Golitsyna, Educational Process in Electronic Information-educational Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 939–944 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.132 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Adam, G. Prostean, A. Badea, O. Prostean, Knowledge Transfer in Educational Projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1460–1466 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.346 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Karimi, H. Taghaddos, The influence of craft workers’ educational attainment and experience level in fatal injuries prevention in construction projects. Safety Science, 117, 417–427 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. H. Duina, J. Tham, The Current State of Analytics: Implications for Learning Management System (LMS) Use in Writing Pedagogy. Computers and Composition. 55, 102544 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Hafeez-Baig, R. Gururajan, P. Danaher, Transforming the practice of mobile learning: Promoting pedagogical innovation through educational principles and strategies that work. Innovative mobile learning: Teaching and Technologies. New York (2009) DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-062-2.ch002 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Bilyalova, ICT in Teaching a Foreign Language in High School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 175–181 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.060 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Nakevska, A. van der Sanden, M. Funk, J. Hu, M. Rauterberg, Interactive storytelling in a mixed reality environment: The effects of interactivity on user experiences. Entertainment Computing, 21, 97–104 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2017.01.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Pifarre, Using interactive technologies to [promote a dialogic space for creating collaboratively: A study in secondary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 32, 1–16 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.tsc2019.01.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. A. Korenev, Feedback in learning, teaching and educational communication. Rhema, 2, 112–126 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.