Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2020
Innovative Technologies in Science and Education (ITSE-2020)
Article Number 20006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Psychology of Sustainability and Human Behavior
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021020006
Published online 04 December 2020
  1. K. Meteshkin, A. Sokolov, O. Morozova, N. Teplova, Journal of education, health and sports 6(7), 375-390 (2016) doi: 10.5281 / zenodo. 58067 [Google Scholar]
  2. S.Yu. Kamianetsky, RUDN journal of Informatization of education 16(1), 64-72 (2019) doi: 10.22363/2312-8631-2019-16-1-64-72 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E.V. Voevoda, Discourse and communication 2(2), 89-94 (2020) doi: 10.24833/2687-0126-2020-2-2-89-94 [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Baczała, Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych 1(26), 7 (2018) doi: 10.12775/PBE.2018.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Ferrari, L. Vuletik, The developmental relations among mind, brain and education (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010) doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3666-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Ferrari, Development and its relation to mind, brain, and education: continuing the cork of Robbie case (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010) doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3666-7_14 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Özdoğru, Journal of Neurobehavioral Sciences (2014) doi: 10.5455/JNBS.1408373410 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jia Jia Xiu, Liang-Cheng Zhang, European journal of psychological assessment in the press (2015) doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000268 [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Cano, Psychology, medicine The British journal of educational psychology 75, 203-21 (2005) DOI:10.1348/000709904X22683 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Giampietro, European journal of cultural and political sociology 3(2-3), 1-5 (2016) doi: 10.1080/23254823.2016.1209886 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Person, Framing social interaction. Continuities and cracks in Goffman`s frame analysis (Liber, London, 2018) doi: 10.4324/9781315582931 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. McKenzie, Interpreting Charles Taylor’s social theory of religion and secularization, 133-167 (2017) doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47700-8_6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Portes, M. Zhou, Annals of the American Academy of political and social Sciences 530(1), (2010) doi: 10.1177/000271629353000106 [Google Scholar]
  14. S.S. Horuzhiy, Questions of Philos. 12 (2011) // http://vphil.ru/index.php?id=435&option=com_content&task=view [Google Scholar]
  15. S.S. Horuzhiy, To the phenomenology of asceticism 6 (1998) // https://predanie.ru/horuzhiy-sergey-sergeevich/k-fenomenologii-askezy/chitat/ [Google Scholar]
  16. V.S. Budanov, Model of evolution of disciplinary knowledge as a process of interdisciplinary coordination // http://www.synergetic.ru/science/model-evolyucii-disciplinarnogo-znania-kak-processa-mezhdisciplinarnogo-soglasovania.html [Google Scholar]
  17. T.S. Nazarova, V.S. Shapovalenko, “Synergetic syndrome” in pedagogy http://www.portalus.ru/modules/shkola/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1192627932&archive=1196815384&start_from=&ucat=& [Google Scholar]
  18. O.V. Erokhina, D. Mukhametov, A.V. Sheremetev, 2019 Wave electronics and its application in information and telecommunications systems (WECONF) (2019) doi: 10.1109/WECONF.2019.8840644 [Google Scholar]
  19. G.P. Williams, Journal of World-Systems Research 19(2), 202-210, (2015) doi: 10.5195/jwsr.2013.491 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Dale, Comparative Strategy 31(5) (2012) doi: 10.1080/01495933.2012.731976 [Google Scholar]
  21. W.I. Robinson, International Sociology 26(6), 723-745 doi: 10.1177/0268580910393372 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. N.G. Osipova, Bulletin of MSU Series 18 Sociology and political science 25(4), 124-153 (2020) doi: 10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-124-153 [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Stepnisky, The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Sociology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2019) doi: 10.1002 / 9781119429333. ch2 [Google Scholar]
  24. V.E. Voitsekhovich, Synergetic concept of fractals (social and philosophical foundations). Synergetic paradigm. Man and society in conditions of instability (Moscow, 2003) https://http.biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book_red&id=445108&razdel=141 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.