EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 211 (2020) E3S Web Conf., 211 (2020) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2020
The 1st JESSD Symposium: International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development 2020
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 12
Section Sustainable Cities and Communities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021101004
Published online 25 November 2020
  1. Transportation Research Board/Institute of Medicine, “Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence, ” TRB Special Report, 282, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. L. D. Frank, T. L. Schmid, J. F. Sallis, J. Chapman and B. E. Saelens, “Linking Objectively Measured Physical Activity with Objectively Measured Urban Form: Findings from SMARTRAQ, ” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 117-125, 2005. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. L. Handy, “Urban form and pedestrian choices: study of Austin neighborhoods, ” Transportation Research Record, 1552, pp. 135–144, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. J. Krizek, “Residential relocation and change in urban travel: does neighborhoodscale urban form matter?, ” Journal of the American Planning Association, pp. 69(3), pp. 265–279., 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Forsyth, “Twin Cities Walking Study: Environment and Physical Activity:, ” pp. GIS Protocols, Version 4.0. Available at http://www.designcenter.umn.edu/projects/current/health/epaGISprotocols.html, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. G. McNally and S. Ryan, “Comparative assessment of travel characteristics for neotraditional designs, ” Transportation Research Record, pp. 1400, pp. 67–77, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. J. Greenwald and M. G. Boarnet, “Built environment as determinant of walking behavior: analyzing nonwork pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon, ” Transportation Research Record, pp. 1780, pp. 33–42, 2000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. V. Moudon, C. Lee, A. D. Cheadle, C. Garvin, D. Johnson, T. L. Schmid, R. Weathers and L. Lin, “Operational definitions of walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights, ” Journal of Physical Activity and Health, pp. 3(Sup. 1), pp. S99–, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Giles-Corti and R. J. Donovan, “The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity, ” Social Science & Medicine, , pp. 54(12), pp. 1793–1812, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Corti, R. J. Donovan and C. Holman, “Factors influencing the use of physical activity facilities: results from qualitative research, ” Health Promotion Journal of Australia, pp. 6, pp. 16–21., 1996. [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Giles-Corti, A. Timperio, F. Bull and T. Pikora, “Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, ” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, pp. 33(4), 175-181., 2005. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. F. Sallis, M. F. Johnson, K. J. Calfas, S. Caparosa and J. F. Nichols, “Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity, ” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, , pp. 68(4), pp. 345–351, 1997. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Wilcox, C. Castro, A. C. King, R. A. Houseman and R. Brownson, “Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States, ” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, p. 5, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. J. Blakely and M. G. Snyder, “Divided We Fall: Gated and Walled Communities in the United States, ” in Architecture of Fear, N. Ellin, Ed., New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Gul, Z. Sultan, M. Moeinaddini and G. A. Jokhio, “Measuring the differences of neighbourhood environment and physical activity in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods in Karachi, Pakistan, ” Journal of Urban Design, pp. 24 (3), 494-513, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1468216 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Gul, Z. Sultan and G. A. Jokhio, “The association between the perception of crime and walking in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods of Asian developing countries, ” Heliyon, p. 715, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00715 [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Grant and L. Mittelsteadt, “Types of gated communities, ” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 31, pp. 913-930, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Gul, Z. Sultan, M. Moeinaddini and G. A. Jokhio, “The effects of sociodemographic factors on physical activity in gated and non-gated neighbourhoods in Karachi, Pakistan, ” Sport in Society, pp. 1225-1239, 2019/7/3. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2018.1508208 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Breitung, “Enclave Urbanism in China: Attitudes Towards Gated Communities in Guangzhou, ” Urban Geography, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 278-294, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Leisch, “Gated communities in Indonesia, ” Cities, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 341-350, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Ahmad, “Choice of Neighbourhoods by Mover Households in Karachi, ” Urban Studies, pp. 1257-1270, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Gul, Effects Of Neighbourhood Environment On Physical Activities In Gated And Non-Gated Neighbourhoods In Karachi, Pakistan, Johar Bahru: UTM, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Gul, S. Zahid and G. A. Jokhio, “Contribution to the Environmental sustainability by improving the walking behaviour through neighbourhoods’ design with special reference to developing countries, ” E3S Web of Conferences, pp. 158, 02002, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015802002 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Gul, Z. Sultan, M. Moeinaddini and G. A. Jokhio, “The effects of physical activity facilities on vigorous physical activity in gated and non-gated neighborhoods, ” Land use policy, pp. 155-162, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.040 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Giles-Cort, A. Timperio, H. Cutt, T. J. Pikora, F. C. Bull, M. Knuiman, M. Bulsara, K. V. Niel and T. Shilton, “Development of a reliable measure of walking within and outside the local neighborhood: RESIDE’s Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire, ” Preventive Medicine, pp. 455-459, 2006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. B. E. Ainsworth, W. L. Haskell, M. C. Whitt, M. L. Irwin, A. M. Swartz, S. J. Strath, W. L. O’brien, D. R. Bassett, k. H. Schmitz, P. O. Emplaincourt, D. R. Jacobs and A. S. Leon, “Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities., ” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, pp. S498-S504, 2000. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. World Health Organization, “Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health, ” WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. L. Handy, M. G. Boarnet, R. Ewing and R. E. Killingsworth, “How the Built Environment Affects Physical Activity Views from Urban Planning, ” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, pp. 64-73, 2002. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. K. Baran, D. A. Rodriguez, A. J. Khattak and A. J. Khattak, “Space Syntax and Walking in a New Urbanist and Suburban Neighbourhoods, ” Journal of Urban Design, vol. 13, pp. 5-28, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. K. Sundquist, U. Eriksson, N. Kawakamia, L. Skog and H. Ohlsson, “Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: The Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study, ” Social Science and Medicine, pp. 1266-1273, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Eva Lesliea, “Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes, ” Health and Place, pp. 111-122, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. M. J. Koohsari, A. T. Kaczynski, G. R. Mcormack and T. Sugiyama, “Using Space Syntax to Assess the Built Environment for Physical Activity: Applications to Research on Parks and Public Open Spaces, ” Leisure Sciences, pp. 206-216, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. B. Hillier and J. Hanson, “The Social Logic of Space, ” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Peponis, C. Feng, D. Green, D. Haynie, S. H. Kim, Q. Sheng, A. Vialard and H. Wang, “Syntax and parametric analysis of superblock patterns John, ” The Journal of Space Syntax, pp. 109–141, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. M. J. Koohsari, N. Owen, E. Cerin, B. Giles-Corti and T. Sugiyama, “Walkability and walking for transport: characterizing the built environment using space syntax, ” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, p. 121, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Burke and C. Sebaly, “Locking in the pedestrian? The privatised streets of gated communities, ” World Transport Policy & Practice, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 61–66, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Miao, “Deserted Streets in a Jammed Town: The Gated Community in Chinese Cities and Its Solution, ” Journal of Urban Design, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45–66, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. B. H. Lida and Shinichi, “Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement, ” Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement, p. 475–490, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Sarkar, C. Webster, M. Pryor, D. Tang, S. Melbourne, X. Zhang and L. Jianzheng, “Exploring associations between urban green, street design and walking: Results from the Greater London boroughs, ” Landscape and Urban Planning, p. (143) 112–125, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. B. Jiang and C. Claramunt, “Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: New Perspectives for Urban Morphology, ” Transactions in GIS, p. 6(3) 295–309, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Y. Gul, Z. Sultan and F. Johar, “Effects of Neighborhood’s Built Environment on Physical Activities in Gated Communities: A Review, ” International Journal Of Built Environment And Sustainability, pp. 60–69, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v3.n1.112 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.