Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2020
The 1st JESSD Symposium: International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development 2020
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 11
Section Digitalization and Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021104005
Published online 25 November 2020
  1. A. Zuiderwijk, N. Helbig, R. Gil-García, M. Janssen, Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction, J. theor. appl. electron. commer. res., 9, 2 (2014), p. I-XIII, https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Luthfi, M. Janssen, Open Data for Evidence-based Decision-making: Data-driven Government Resulting in Uncertainty and Polarization, IJASEIT, 9, 3 (2019), pp. 1071–1078 [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Palacin, S. Ginnane, M.A. Ferrario, A. Happonen, A. Wolff, S. Piutunen, N. Kupiainen, SENSEI: Harnessing Community Wisdom for Local Environmental Monitoring in Finland, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glagsgow, Scotland UK, (2019), pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299047 [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Findler, N. Schönherr, R. Lozano, D. Reider, A. Martinuzzi, The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 20, 1 (2019), pp. 23–38, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2017-0114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Hirvimäki, M. Manninen, A. Lehti, A. Happonen, A. Salminen, O. Nyrhilä, Evaluation of Different Monitoring Methods of Laser Additive Manufacturing of Stainless Steel, Advanced Materials Research, 651, (2013), pp. 812–819, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.651.812 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Youtie, P. Shapira, Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development, Research policy, 37, 8 (2018), pp. 1188–1204 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Monavvarifard, M. Baradaran, B. Khosravipour, Increasing the sustainability level in agriculture and Natural Resources Universities of Iran through students’ engagement in the value Co-creation process, J. Clean. Prod, 234, (2019), pp. 353–365 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Liesiö, P. Mild, A. Salo, Preference Programming for Robust Portfolio Modeling and Project Selection, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 3 (2007), pp. 1488-1505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.041 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Rybnicek, R. Königsgruber, What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature, J. Bus. Econ, 89, (2019). pp. 221–250 [Google Scholar]
  10. M.F. Chaplin, Water: its importance to life, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 29, 2 (2001), pp. 54–59, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-3429.2001.tb00070.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Levallois, C.M. Villanueva, Drinking Water Quality and Human Health: An Editorial, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 4 (2019), pp. 1–4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Sabater, F. Bregoli, V. Acuña, D. Barceló, A. Elosegi, A. Ginebreda, R. Marcé, I. Muñoz, L. Sabater-Liesa, V. Ferreira, Effects of human-driven water stress on river ecosystems: a meta-analysis, Scientific Reports, 8, (2018), pp. 1–11 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O.A. Alshikhi, B.A. Abdullah, Information Quality: Definitions, Measurement, Dimensions, and Relationship with Decision Making, EJBIR, 6, 5 (2018), pp. 36–42 [Google Scholar]
  14. Z. Houhamdi, B. Athamena, Impacts of information quality on decision-making, GBER, 21, 1 (2019), pp. 26–42 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Eskelinen, T. Räsänen, U. Santti, A. Happonen, M. Kajanus, Designing a Business Model for Environmental Monitoring Services Using Fast MCDS Innovation Support Tools. TIM Review, 7, 11 (2017), pp. 36–46, http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1119 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. De Bernardi, A. Bertello, F. Ricciardi, S. Moggi, Business Model Innovation in SMEs Engagin in Innovation Ecosystems: a Decoupling Perspective, In ITAIS and MCIS 2019: a Joint Conference Event, (2019), pp. 1–10 [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Kortelainen, A. Happonen, J. Hanski, From asset provider to knowledge company transformation in the digital era, In Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, (2019), pp. 333–341, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95711-1_33 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Kortelainen, A. Happonen, S-K. Kinnunen, S-K., Fleet Service Generation— Challenges in Corporate Asset Management”, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 373-380, (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27064-7_35 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J.C. Molloy, The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science, PLoS Biology, 9, 12 (2011), e1001195, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Huston, V.L. Edge, E. Bernier, Reaping the benefits of Open Data in public health, Canada Communicable Disease Report, 45, 11 (2019), pp. 252–256 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Verhulst, A. Young, Open Data in Developing Economies: Toward Building an Evidence Base on What Works and How, ISBN: 978-1-928331-59-9, (2017), p. 281 [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Ghoreishi, A. Happonen, M. Pynnönen, Exploring Industry 4.0 Technologies to Enhance Circularity in Textile Industry: Role of Internet of Things, In Twenty-first International Working Seminar on Production Economics, February 24-28, 2020, Innsbruck, Austria, p. 16 [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Auvinen, U. Santti, A. Happonen, Technologies for Reducing Emissions and Costs in Combined Heat and Power Production, E3S Web Conf., 158, (2020), pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015803006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Finnish Government: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2019, Private capital to help solve global challenges, https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/article/-/asset_publisher/1410837/yksityinen-paaoma-globaalien-ongelmien-ratkaisijaksi [Google Scholar]
  25. Gaia Consulting Oy, SDGs roadmap to sustainable investments, https://kestavakehitys.fi/ajankohtaista/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/1410837/hyvinvointia-yhteiskunnalle-ja-tuottoa-sijoittajalle (2019) [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Young, K. Hwang, S. McDonald, C.J. Oates, Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable development, 18, 1 (2010), pp. 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  27. K.G. Grunert, Sustainability in the food sector: A consumer behaviour perspective, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2, 3 (2011), pp. 207–218 [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Antonides, Sustainable consumer behaviour: A collection of empirical studies, Sustainability, 9, 10 (2017), Article: 1686, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101686 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. U. Santti, A. Happonen, H. Auvinen, Digitalization Boosted Recycling: Gamification as an Inspiration for Young Adults to do Enhanced Waste Sorting, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2233, 1 (2020), pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0001547 [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Shen, T. Oki, S. Kanae, N. Hanasaki, N. Utsumi, M. Kiguchi, Projection of future world water resources under SRES scenarios: an integrated assessment, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59, 10 (2014), pp. 1775–1793 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Kraus, T. Clauss, M. Breier, J. Gast, A. Zardini, V. Tiberius, The economics of COVID-19: initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis, Int. J. Entrepreneurial Behav. Res., 26, 5 (2020), pp. 1067-1092, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2020-0214 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Tisserand, Europe’s water in figures, The European Federation of National Associations of Water Services, (2017), http://www.eureau.org/resources/publications/1460-eureau-data-report-2017-1/file [Google Scholar]
  33. Interneg, EU Digital Resources. 2017. https://www.interregcentral.eu/Content.Node/Digital-Learning-Resources/03-Water-Loss.pdf [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Porras, J. Khakurel, J. Ikonen, A. Happonen, A. Knutas, A. Herala, O. Drögehorn, Hackathons in software engineering education – lessons learned from a decade of events, International Conference on Software Engineering 2018 (ICSE), Gothenburg, Sweden, (2018), pp. 40–47, https://doi.org/10.1145/3194779.3194783 [Google Scholar]
  35. U. Santti, T. Eskelinen, M. Rajahonka, K. Villman, A. Happonen, Effects of Business Model Development Projects on Organizational Culture: A Multiple Case Study of SMEs, TIM Review, 7, 8 (2017), pp. 15–26, http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1096 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Porras, A. Knutas, J. Ikonen, A. Happonen, J. Khakurel, A. Herala, Code camps and hackathons in education literature review and lessons learned, HICSS 2019, Hawaii, USA, pp. 7750-7759, (2019), https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.933 [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Salmela, C. Santos, A. Happonen, Formalization of Front End Innovation in Supply Network Collaboration, IJIRD, 5, 1 (2013), pp. 91–111, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2013.052510 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Kajanus, A. Iire, T. Eskelinen, M. Heinonen, E. Hansen, Business Model Design: New Tools for Business Systems Innovation, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 6 (2014), pp. 603–614, https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.949301 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Palacin-Silva, J. Khakurel, A. Happonen, T. Hynninen, J. Porras, Infusing Design Thinking Into a Software Engineering Capstone Course, The 30th IEEE CSEE & T Savannah, Georgia, USA, (2017), pp. 1–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2017.41 [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Happonen, D. Minashkina, A. Nolte, M.A. Medina Angarita, Hackathons as a Company – University Collaboration Tool to Boost Circularity Innovations and Digitalization Enhanced Sustainability, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2233, 1 (2020), pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0001883 [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Happonen, V. Siljander, Gainsharing in Logistics Outsourcing: Trust leads to Success in the Digital Era, International Journal of Collaborative Enterprise, 6, 2 (2020), pp. 150–175, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCENT.2020.110221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Sosna, R.N. Trevinyo-Rodríguez, S.R. Velamuri, Business Model Innovation through Trial-and-Error Learning, Long Range Planning, 43, 2-3 (2010), pp. 383–407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. A. Happonen, D. Minashkina, Ideas and experiences from university industry collaboration: Hackathons, Code Camps and citizen participation, LUT Reports series report 86, ISBN: 978-952-335-253-7, ISSN: 2243-3384, pp. 1-21, (2018), https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.29690.44480 [Google Scholar]
  44. H. Chesbrough, Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers, Long Range Planning, 43, 2-3 (2010), pp. 354–363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. R.G. McGrath, Business models: A discovery driven approach, Long Range Planning, 43, 2-3 (2010), pp. 247–261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation. John Wiley and Sons: New Jersey, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  47. P. Ahokangas, J. Myllykoski, The Practice of Creating and Transforming a Business Model, JOBM, 2, 1 (2014), pp. 6–18, https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jbm.v2i1.719 [Google Scholar]
  48. A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, C.L. Tucci, Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept, Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16, 1 (2005), https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01601 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mordor Intelligence Report. 2019. https://mordorintelligence.com/industryreports/smart-water-management-market [Google Scholar]
  50. H. Piili, T. Widmaier, A. Happonen, J. Juhanko, A. Salminen, P. Kuosmanen, O. Nyrhilä, Digital design process and additive manufacturing of a configurable product, Journal Advanced Science Letters, 19, 3 (2013), p. 926–931, https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2013.4827 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. T. Widmaier, J. Juhanko, H. Piili, P. Kuosmanen, A. Salminen, A. Happonen, J. Kontio, O. Nyrhilä, Digital design and manufacturing process comparison for new custom made product family – a case study of a bathroom faucet, Estonian Journal of Engineering, 19, 1 (2013) pp. 76–89, http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/eng.2013.1.07 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Ghoreishi, A. Happonen, Key enablers for deploying artificial intelligence for circular economy embracing sustainable product design: Three case studies, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2233, 1 (2020), pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0001339 [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Ghoreishi, A. Happonen, New promises AI brings into circular economy accelerated product design: a review on supporting literature, E3S Web Conf., 158, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015806002 [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Meadowcroft, What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions, Policy sciences, 42, 4 (2019), pp. 323340 [Google Scholar]
  55. V. Palacin, S. Gilbert, S. Orchard, A. Eaton, M.A. Ferrario, A. Happonen, Drivers of Participation in Digital Citizen Science: Case Studies on Järviwiki and Safecast, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5, 1 (2020) pp. 1–20, http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.290 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.