Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2020
2020 International Conference on Energy Big Data and Low-carbon Development Management (EBLDM 2020)
Article Number 03014
Number of page(s) 4
Section Digital Development and Environmental Management of Energy Supply Chain
Published online 07 December 2020
  1. Deloitte. (2019) Global perspectives for private companies: Agility in changing markets. Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  2. Sina Finance and Green Finance International Research Institute of Central University of Finance and Economics. (2019) CHINA ESG WHITEBOOK[white book]Retrieved from: finance. sina. com. cn/esg/other/whitebook. shtml. [Google Scholar]
  3. CSR Europr. (2019) 2030 Strategy: Mainstreaming the urgency to action for sustainable impact. Retrieved from: E 2030Strategy Brochure_0.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2019). Creating shared value. In Managing sustainable business (pp. 323-346). Springer, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jo H., & Harjoto, M.A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106(1), 53-72. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stanwick, P.A., & Stanwick, S.D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of business ethics, 17(2), 195-204. [Google Scholar]
  7. Anon Digital Literacy - Communication – Oxford Bibliographies - obo. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter, D.A., D’Souza F., Simkins, B.J., & Simpson, W.G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414. [Google Scholar]
  9. Haniffa R., & Hudaib M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7‐8), 1034-1062. [Google Scholar]
  10. Francoeur C., Labelle R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of business ethics, 81(1), 83-95. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackling B., & Johl S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-509. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cornett, M.M., Marcus, A.J., Saunders A., & Tehranian H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), 1771-1794. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kacperczyk A. (2009). With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 30(3), 261-285. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brammer S., Jackson G., & Matten D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-economic review, 10(1), 3-28. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jo H., & Harjoto, M.A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 103(3), 351-383. [Google Scholar]
  16. Prior D., Surroca J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. corporate governance: An international review, 16(3), 160-177. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.