Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 217, 2020
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Environmental Risks and Safety in Mechanical Engineering” (ERSME-2020)
Article Number 04008
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Monitoring and Protection
Published online 14 December 2020
  1. Trushkova E, Omelchenko E Determination of Factors of Professional Health Risk of Engineering Workers. In: Popovic Z., Manakov A., Breskich V. (eds) VIII International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum. TransSiberia 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1116 Springer, Cham. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao, B. -S., Zou, C. -X., Gao, J. -X., He, P. Review on methodology and application of ecological security assessment, Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment 35 (8), 1673-4831 (201908-0953-11, 953-963 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. Burkov, V., Titarenko, B. Economic mechanisms for environmental risk management, E3S Web of Conferences 91, 08009 (2019) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Matveeva A.A., Ladonina E.Yu., Popova O.Yu., Some approaches to management and provision of industrial and environmental safety at regional enterprises, 1st International Scientific Practical Conference on Breakthrough Technologies and Communications in Industry, BTCI 2018; Volgograd State University, Volgograd; Russian Federation IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 483, 1, 20 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. Omelchenko E.V., Trushkova E.A., Sidelnikov M.V., Pushenko S.L., Staseva E.V. : Algorithm research exposure dust emissions enterprises of building production on the environment. IOP Conf. Ser. : Earth Environ. Sci. 50, 012018 (2017). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/50/1/012018 [Google Scholar]
  6. Sorgog, K., Kamo, M., Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 183 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. Griffin R.L., Uncertain about uncertainty in pest risk analysis, Acta Horticulturae 1105, 315-320 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. Holt J, Leach A.W., Linguistic variables as fuzzy sets to model uncertainty in the combined efficacy of multiple phytosanitary measures in pest risk analysis, Ecological Modelling 406, 73-79 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. Omelchenko E.V., Trushkova E.A., Pushenko S.L., Firsov V.A., Sitnik S.V. : Technique of an Assessment of Industrial Safety of Paint and Varnish Productions. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 66(1):012031(2017). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/66/1/012031 [Google Scholar]
  10. Glen N, Korol O, André L., Robert F, Tom G, Extracting pest risk information from risk assessment documents, Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeger M, Bragard C, Caffier D, Candresse T, Chatzivassiliou E, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Grégoire J. -C., Jaques M.J.A., MacLeod A, Navajas N.M., Niere B, Parnell S, Potting R, Rafoss T, Rossi V, Urek G, Van Bruggen, A., Van Der Werf W., West J, Winter S, Hart A, Schans J, Schrader G, Suffert M, Kertész V, Kozelska S, Mannino, M.R., Mosbach-Schulz, O., Pautasso, M., Stancanelli, G., Tramontini, S., Vos, S., Gilioli, G., EFSA Panelon Plant Health (PLH) Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment, EFSA Journal 16 (8) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. Baptistucci C.B., Pech G, Carvalho M.M., Experts' engagement in risk analysis: A model merging analytic hierarchy, Journal of Modern Project Management 6 (1), 6-17 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. Soukar L, Natural resources endowment and WTO, Journal of Economic Integration 34 (3), 546-589 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. Pysarenko P.V., Samojlik M.S., Plaksiienko I.L., Kolesnikova L.A., Conceptual framework for ensuring resource and environmental safety in the region, Theoretical and Applied Ecology (2), 137-142 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. Likhachev S, Borenstein A, Raksha N, Larina E. m Ensuring environmental safety from the perspective of the protection of the national interests of the state, International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM 19 (5. 4), 459-464 (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.