Innovative development opportunities for construction enterprises in the context of global challenges

Ekaterina Acri; Anna Kornilova; Zhanna Selezneva; Natalia Solopova

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202022001102

All issues

Volume 220 (2020)

E3S Web Conf., 220 (2020) 01102

References

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 220, 2020 Sustainable Energy Systems: Innovative Perspectives (SES-2020)


Article Number		01102
Number of page(s)		5
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202022001102
Published online		19 February 2021

S. Domnina, E. Savoskina, N. Shekhova On innovative decisions in the investment-construction cycle. Procedia Engineering, 153, 741-746 (2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.236 [Google Scholar]
V. Kankhva Risk management in the implementation of smart building projects. MATEC Web Conf., 106, 08027 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710608027V [Google Scholar]
S. Korol Innovative development of the construction industry as an economic category of the control object. Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal 1 4501 (2016) [Google Scholar]
W. Shou, J. Wang, X. Wang, et al. A comparative review of building information modelling implementation in building and infrastructure industries. Arch. Computat. Methods. Eng., 22, 291–308 (2015) DOI: 10.1007/s11831-014-9125-9 [Google Scholar]
E. Chirkunova, E. Kireeva, A. Kornilova, Y. Pshenichnikova Research of instruments for financing of innovation and investment construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 153, 112-117 (2016) DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.089 [Google Scholar]
A. Solovyev, A. Pustovgar, L. Shilova, A. Adamtsevich, D. Solovev Simulating power efficiency of heat transfer agent cooling recirculation systems at power plants. Procedia Engineering, 165, 1275-1280 (2016) DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.850 [Google Scholar]
V. Rozhkov, D. Zainullina A critical analysis of the prospects for innovative development of the construction industry in the Republic of Tatarstan // Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 17, 2911–2922. (2016) DOI: 10.18334/rp.17.21.36934 [Google Scholar]
High school of Economics Business climate in construction in the first quarter of 2020. Moscow: HSE.URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/357527741.pdf. [Google Scholar]
I. Ilin, O. Kalinina, O. Iliashenko, A. Levina ITarchitecture reengineering as a prerequisite for sustainable development in Saint Petersburg urban underground. Procedia Engineering, 165, 1683-1692 (2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.910 [Google Scholar]
A. Kornilova, E. Acri, N. Pronina Automation of design and technological preparation of repair works. In: Ashmarina S., Mantulenko V. (Eds.), Current Achievements, Challenges and Digital Chances of Knowledge Based Economy. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 133 (pp. 347-351). Cham:Springer (2021) DOI: doi.org/10.1007/978-3030-47458-4_41 [Google Scholar]
D. Paredes, M. The net benefit of demolishing dilapidated housing: The case of Detroit. Regional science and urban economics, 66, 16-27 (2017) [Google Scholar]
H.-Y. Chong, X. Wang The outlook of building information modeling for sustainable development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18, 1877–1887(2016) [Google Scholar]
Nuvolari A. Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 28 № 3 P. 347–363 (2004) [Google Scholar]
Douthwaite B., Keatinge J.D.H., Park J.R. Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption // Research Policy. Vol. 30 P. 819–836 (2001) [Google Scholar]
Harhoff D., Joachin H., von Hippel E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit from freely revealing their innovations // Research Policy. Vol. 32 № 10 P. 1753–1769 (2003) [Google Scholar]
Barbaroux P. On the Nature and Logics of Innovation Capabilities within Knowledge-Intensive Environments: A Case Study // Journal of Innovation Economics. Vol. 1 № 3 P. 169–188 (2009) [Google Scholar]
Jin C., von Hippel E. The major shift towards usercentered innovation. Implications for China’s innovation policymaking // Journal of KnowledgeBased Innovation in China. Vol. 32 № 1 P. 16–27 (2009) [Google Scholar]
Franke N., Shah S. How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users // Research Policy. Vol. 32 P. 157–178 (2003) [Google Scholar]
Calvignac C. Socio-économie d’une innovation par l’usager. Les réseaux wifi-communautaires // Réseaux (148–149). P. 200–34 (2008). [Google Scholar]
Morrison P.D., Roberts J.H., von Hippel E. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market // Management Science. Vol. 46 № 12 P. 1513–1527 (2000). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

[1] S. Domnina, E. Savoskina, N. Shekhova On innovative decisions in the investment-construction cycle. Procedia Engineering, 153, 741-746 (2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.236 [Google Scholar]

[2] V. Kankhva Risk management in the implementation of smart building projects. MATEC Web Conf., 106, 08027 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710608027V [Google Scholar]

[3] S. Korol Innovative development of the construction industry as an economic category of the control object. Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal 1 4501 (2016) [Google Scholar]

[4] W. Shou, J. Wang, X. Wang, et al. A comparative review of building information modelling implementation in building and infrastructure industries. Arch. Computat. Methods. Eng., 22, 291–308 (2015) DOI: 10.1007/s11831-014-9125-9 [Google Scholar]

[5] E. Chirkunova, E. Kireeva, A. Kornilova, Y. Pshenichnikova Research of instruments for financing of innovation and investment construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 153, 112-117 (2016) DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.089 [Google Scholar]

[6] A. Solovyev, A. Pustovgar, L. Shilova, A. Adamtsevich, D. Solovev Simulating power efficiency of heat transfer agent cooling recirculation systems at power plants. Procedia Engineering, 165, 1275-1280 (2016) DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.850 [Google Scholar]

[7] V. Rozhkov, D. Zainullina A critical analysis of the prospects for innovative development of the construction industry in the Republic of Tatarstan // Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 17, 2911–2922. (2016) DOI: 10.18334/rp.17.21.36934 [Google Scholar]

[8] High school of Economics Business climate in construction in the first quarter of 2020. Moscow: HSE.URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/357527741.pdf. [Google Scholar]

[9] I. Ilin, O. Kalinina, O. Iliashenko, A. Levina ITarchitecture reengineering as a prerequisite for sustainable development in Saint Petersburg urban underground. Procedia Engineering, 165, 1683-1692 (2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.910 [Google Scholar]

[10] A. Kornilova, E. Acri, N. Pronina Automation of design and technological preparation of repair works. In: Ashmarina S., Mantulenko V. (Eds.), Current Achievements, Challenges and Digital Chances of Knowledge Based Economy. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 133 (pp. 347-351). Cham:Springer (2021) DOI: doi.org/10.1007/978-3030-47458-4_41 [Google Scholar]

[11] D. Paredes, M. The net benefit of demolishing dilapidated housing: The case of Detroit. Regional science and urban economics, 66, 16-27 (2017) [Google Scholar]

[12] H.-Y. Chong, X. Wang The outlook of building information modeling for sustainable development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18, 1877–1887(2016) [Google Scholar]

[13] Nuvolari A. Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 28 № 3 P. 347–363 (2004) [Google Scholar]

[14] Douthwaite B., Keatinge J.D.H., Park J.R. Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption // Research Policy. Vol. 30 P. 819–836 (2001) [Google Scholar]

[15] Harhoff D., Joachin H., von Hippel E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit from freely revealing their innovations // Research Policy. Vol. 32 № 10 P. 1753–1769 (2003) [Google Scholar]

[16] Barbaroux P. On the Nature and Logics of Innovation Capabilities within Knowledge-Intensive Environments: A Case Study // Journal of Innovation Economics. Vol. 1 № 3 P. 169–188 (2009) [Google Scholar]

[17] Jin C., von Hippel E. The major shift towards usercentered innovation. Implications for China’s innovation policymaking // Journal of KnowledgeBased Innovation in China. Vol. 32 № 1 P. 16–27 (2009) [Google Scholar]

[18] Franke N., Shah S. How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users // Research Policy. Vol. 32 P. 157–178 (2003) [Google Scholar]

[19] Calvignac C. Socio-économie d’une innovation par l’usager. Les réseaux wifi-communautaires // Réseaux (148–149). P. 200–34 (2008). [Google Scholar]

[20] Morrison P.D., Roberts J.H., von Hippel E. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market // Management Science. Vol. 46 № 12 P. 1513–1527 (2000). [Google Scholar]