Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 229, 2021
The 3rd International Conference of Computer Science and Renewable Energies (ICCSRE’2020)
Article Number 01031
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202122901031
Published online 25 January 2021
  1. Sciencedirect, P., Manoj, N., Kumar, P.: ScienceDirect The Internet of Things : Insights into the building blocks, component interactions, and architecture layers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 132, 109–117 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colakovi, A.: Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues ˇ. 144, 17–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Noura, M., Atiquzzaman, M., Gaedke, M.: Interoperability in Internet of Things Infrastructure : Classi fi cation, Challenges, and Future Work. Springer International Publishing (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00410-1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Noura, M.: Interoperability in Internet of Things : Taxonomies and Open Challenges. 796–809 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanc-Serrier, S., Ducq, Y., Vallespir, B.: Organisational interoperability characterisation and evaluation using enterprise modelling and graph theory. Comput. Ind. 101, 67–80 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Pawłowski, W., Szmeja, P., Wasielewska, K.: Towards Semantic Interoperability Between Internet of Things Platforms. Presented at the (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61300-0_6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Salman, O., Elhajj, I., Chehab, A., Kayssi, A.: IoT survey: An SDN and fog computing perspective. Comput. Networks. 143, 221–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Alenezi, M., Almustafa, K., Amjad, K.: Cloud based SDN and NFV architectures for IoT infrastructure. Egypt. Informatics J. 20, 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2018.03.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Afaf Mosaif, S.R.: SMART HOME BASED ON LI-FI TECHNOLOGY. [Google Scholar]
  10. Proenc, J., Cruz, T., Sim, P.: Virtualization of Residential Gateways : A Comprehensive Survey. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2874827. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moyano, R.F.: A software ‐ defined networking approach to improve service provision in residential networks. 1–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.1984. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, K., Wang, X., Wei, W., Song, H., Mao, B.: Toward Software Defined Smart Home. 116–122 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan, W., Wang, Z., Li, J., Gui, X.: Survey on recent smart gateways for smart home : Systems, technologies, and challenges. 1–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4067. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wasicek, A., Köpsell, S., Strufe, T.: Transparent Microsegmentation in Smart Home IoT Networks. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cristian, A.C., Gabriel, T., Arhip-calin, M., Zamfirescu, A.: Smart home automation with MQTT. 2019 54th Int. Univ. Power Eng. Conf. 1–5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2019.8893617. [Google Scholar]
  16. Based, A., Froiz-míguez, I., Fernández-caramés, T.M., Fraga-lamas, P., Castedo, L.: Design, Implementation and Practical Evaluation of Sensor Nodes. 1–42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082660. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.