Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2021
International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2020)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01036 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Agricultural Economic | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123201036 | |
| Published online | 25 January 2021 | |
- S. Jenderal, D. E. Nasional, K. E. Dan, and S. D. Mineral, “RENCANA STRATEGIS 2015 s.d. 2019,” 2014. [Google Scholar]
- D. P. dan P. K. Cepogo, Data Pemilik Ternak Di Kecamatan Cepogo. Boyolali: UPT Disnakkan Kecamatan Cepogo, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- V. Baú, “Waving the flag for development communication: Why there is still hope for communication research,” Int. Commun. Gaz., Vol. 78, No. 7, pp. 711-715, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1748048516655733. [Google Scholar]
- E. M. Rogers, “Komunikasi dan Pembangunan: Perspektif Kritis,” LP3S. Jakarta. Rogers, EM dan FF, Terjem. Abdillah Hanafi,(1971). Commun. Innov. Memasyarakatkan Ide-Ide Baru. Usaha Nasional. Surabaya, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- M. J. Dutta, “A culture-centered approach to listening: Voices of social change,” Int. J. List., Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 67-81, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Rosyidi, Moch Imron; Budi Guntoro; Raya, Alia Bihrajihant; Rasyid Erwin, “ANOMALI HETERODOKSA DALAM PRAKTIK KOMUNIKASI KELOMPOK MANTONGAN PADA PRODUKSI GARAM RAKYAT DI SURABAYA,” J. Komun. Pembang., vol. Vol. 18 (0, pp. 55-66, 2020, doi: 10.22500/18202028689. [Google Scholar]
- K. Ott, “Variants of de-growth and deliberative democracy: A Habermasian proposal,” Futures, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 571-581, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- D. Susanti, U. M. Magelang, P. Dwihantoro, U. M. Magelang, P. Sukmasetya, and U. M. Magelang, “Participatory Communication in the Development of Rural Tourism (Case Study : Temanggung Papringan Market ),” Vol. 459, no. Jcc, pp. 86-88, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- “Koran Tempo,” pp. 215-225. [Google Scholar]
- F. B. Hardiman, “Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif: Ilmu,” Masy. Polit. Postmodernisme Menurut Jurgen Habermas, Yogyakarta, Kanisius, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- S. Susen, “Jürgen Habermas: Between democratic deliberation and deliberative democracy,” 2018. [Google Scholar]
- D. Vitale, “Between deliberative and participatory democracy: A contribution on Habermas,” Philos. Soc. Crit., Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 739-766, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- A. B. Raya, “The Influence of Social Network Structure on the Farmer Group Participation in Indonesia,” Asian Soc. Sci, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 119-129, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. sage, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Zid, “Menelusuri Pemikiran Habermas tentang Gerakan Lingkungan,” Region, vol. I, No. 2, pp. 1-23, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- B. Forchtner and C. Schneickert, “Collective learning in social fields: Bourdieu, Habermas and critical discourse studies,” Discourse Soc., Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 293-307, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0957926516630892. [Google Scholar]
- M. Hammond, “Deliberative democracy as a critical theory,” Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Polit. Philos., Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 787-808, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.