EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 328 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 328 (2021) 03003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2021
International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2021)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Informatics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132803003
Published online 06 December 2021
  1. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia, “Laporan Ringkas Outlook Pangan Daging Sapi 2015-2019,” (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. Badan Litbang Pertanian, Menuju Bibit Ternak Berstandar SNI, 21st-27 Agus ed. Jakarta: AgroinovasI Sinar tani, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. Kementerian Pertanian, Pedoman Pembibitan Sapi Potong yang Baik. Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Sumaryanti and Nurcholis, “Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method for Selection the Superior Cattle,” INTENSIF J. Ilm. Penelit. dan Penerapan Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 131–141, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Patil, S. Payer, T. Teli, and S. Jaychandran, “Decision Support System for Agriculture Management,” Int. J. Emerg. Trends Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 3505–3508, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Sumaryanti, T. K. Rahayu, A. Prayitno, and Salju, “Comparison study of SMART and AHP method for paddy fertilizer recommendation in decision support system,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 343, no. 1, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. S. Wang, H. L. Yang, and S. L. Lin, “To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2015, pp. 1–15, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Dalalah, F. Al-oqla, and M. Hayajneh, “Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Cranes,” vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 567–578, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Int. J. Oper. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56–66, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Siregar, D. Arisandi, A. Usman, D. Irwan, and R. Rahim, “Research of Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for Decision Support,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., pp. 1–6, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Sumaryanti, L. Lamalewa, and T. Istanto, “Implementation of Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Recommendation Paddy Fertilizer,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 236–243, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Rupnik, M. Kukar, P. Vra, D. Ko, D. Pevec, and Z. Bosni, “AgroDSS : A decision support system for agriculture and farming,” Comput. Electron. Agric., no. April, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Kerselaers, E. Rogge, L. Lauwers, and G. Van Huylenbroeck, “Decision support for prioritising of land to be preserved for agriculture: Can participatory tool development help?,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 110, pp. 208–220, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. H. G. Shakouri and Y. N. Tavassoli, “Expert Systems with Applications Implementation of a hybrid fuzzy system as a decision support process : A FAHP – FMCDM – FIS composition,” Expert Syst. with Appl. J., vol. 39, pp. 3682–3691, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Risawandi and R. Robbi, “Study of the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique For Decision Support Study of the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique For Decision Support,” IJSRST, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 491–494, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Tan and L. Tan, “Cloud-based Decision Support and Automation Decision Support Decision Support and and Automation Automation Agriculture in Orchards Agriculture in Orchards Agriculture in Orchards for for for Precision Precision Precision,” Int. Fed. Autom. Control, vol. 49, no. 16, pp. 330–335, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Kumbhar, “A Comprehensive Study of Application of Decision Support System in Agriculture in Indian Context,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 63, no. 14, pp. 6–11, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. D. C. Rose et al., “Decision support tools for agriculture : Towards effective design and delivery,” Agric. Syst. J., vol. 149, pp. 165–174, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Fredrickson, M. Mannino, O. Alqahtani, and F. Banaei-kashani, “Using similarity measures for medical event sequences to predict mortality in trauma patients,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 116, no. October 2018, pp. 35–47, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, Z. Turskis, and H. Adeli, “Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering,” Sci. Iran., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–20, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  21. Marco Bartolozzi, Pierfrancesco Bellini, Paolo Nesi, Gianni Pantaleo., Luca Santi., A Smart Decision Support System for Smart City, IEEE International Conference on Smart City. DOI 10.1109/SmartCity. (2015).57. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ihsan Kaya., Cengiz Kahraman., A Comparison of Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Methods for Intelligent Building Assessme. Journal Of Civil Engineering and Management. 2014 Volume 20(1): 59–69. Doi:10.3846/13923730.2013.801906. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Febriansyah, R. Gernowo, A. Kusumawardhani, Implementation of AHP and TOPSIS Method to Determine the Priority of Improving the Management of Government’s Assets, International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), Volume 4 (March 2017) Issue 03, pp: 46 – 53. [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Dehe, and D. Bamford, Development, Test And Comparison Of Two Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Models: A Case Of Healthcare Infrastructure Location, Expert Systems with Applications, 42 (2015), pp: 6717–6727. [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Kerselaers, E. Rogge, L. Lauwers, G. V. Huylenbroeck, Decision support for prioritising of land to be preserved for agriculture: Can participatory tool development help, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 110 (2015), Elsevier, pp: 208–220. [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Sumaryanti, A. Musdholifah, S. Hartati, “Digital Image Processing and Neural Network,” TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 182-190, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Sumaryanti, Analisis Citra Digital untuk Klasifikasi Kualitas Beras, Jurnal Ilmiah Mustek Anim Ha, Vol. 7 No.2, Agustus (2018), pp : 87-101. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Farshidi, S. Jansen, R. de Jong, and S. Brinkkemper, A Decision Support System for Software Technology Selection, Journal of Decision Systems, 2018, Published by Informa UK Limited, https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2018.1464821. [Google Scholar]
  29. S. N. Taati, A. E. Dooki, A Hybrid Method of Fuzzy DEMATEL/AHP/VIKOR Approach to Rank and Select The Best Hospital Nurses Of A Years: A Case Study, Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2017), pp: 116–132. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.