Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2021
International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2021)
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Mathematic Model, Learning Modelep, Epidemic Model
Published online 06 December 2021
  1. Molles MC. Ecology Concept and Applications. 2nd Edition, Mexico City: McGraw Hill, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell NA, ReeceJB, MitchellLG. Biologi Jilid3.Edisi 5. Jakarta : Erlangga, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  3. Sarwardi S and Mandal PK, Dynamical behaviour of a two-predator model with prey refuge J. Bio Phys 39 : 701-722, (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Khajanchi S, Dynamic behavior of a Beddington-DeAngelis type stage structure predator-prey model, J. App. Math. And Comp., 244 344-360, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Savitri D and Abadi, Numerical Simulation in Prey-Predator Model with a structure for prey Atlantis Highlights in Engineering (AHE), (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. L. K. Beay, A. Suryanto, I. Darti, and Trisilowati, “Stability of a stage-structure Rosenzweig-MacArthur model incorporating Holling type-II functional response,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 546, p. 052017, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Savitri D, Stability and Numerical Simulation of Prey-predator System with Holling Type-II Functional Responses for Adult Prey, J. of Phys. : Conference Series, vol : 1417 issue : 1-12-20, 1417 012025, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  8. Falconi, Huenchucona M, and Vidal C, Stability and global dynamic of stage-structured predator-prey model with group defense mechanism of the prey J. App. Math. And Comp 270 47-61, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Khajanchi and S. Banerjee, “Role of constant prey refuge on stage structure predator–prey model with ratio dependent functional response,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 314, pp. 193–198, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beay LK, and Saija M, A Stage-Structure Rosenzweig-MacArthur Model with Effect of Prey Refuge, Jambura J. Biomath, Vol. 1, Issue 1: June, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. Tang B and Xiao Y, Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey model with anti predator behaviour, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 70, 58-68, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Panja P, Mondal S and Chattopadhyay J, Dynamical Effects of Anti-predator of Adult Prey in a Pretator-prey Model with Ratio-dependent Fuctional Response, Asian J. of Math and Phys, Vol. 1. ISSUE I, 2017, 19-32, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  13. B. S. R. V. Prasad, M. Banerjee, P. D. N. Srinivasu, Dynamics of Additional Food Provided Predator-Prey System with Mutually Interfering Predators, Mathematical Biosciences, 176-190, (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. H.M. Ulfa, A. Suryanto, and I. Darti, Dynamics of Leslie-Gower Predator-prey Model with additional food for Predator, J. of Pure and Appl. Math., vol. 115, no. 2, p. 199-209, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu et al., The Influence of fear effect to the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey System with Predator has other food Resource., Advances in Difference Equations.,, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  16. Holling CS. The Functional Response of Predator to Prey Density and its Role in Mimicry and Population Regulation. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 1965;97: 5-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Savitri D, Dynamics Analysis of Anti-Predator Model on Intermediate Predator With Ratio Dependent Functional Responses, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 953 doi :10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012201, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  18. Salamah U, Suryanto A, and Kusumawinahyu, W.M., AIP Conf. Proc. 2084, 020001-1–0200017;, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  19. Apriyani. A, Darti. I., and Suryanto. A, AIP Conference Proceedings 2084, 020002;, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Boyce, W. E., & DiPrima, R. C., Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems. xvi+809, (2012). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.