EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 331 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 331 (2021) 04012 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 331, 2021
International Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Management (ICDMM 2021)
Article Number 04012
Number of page(s) 4
Section Lesson Learnt in Disaster Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202133104012
Published online 13 December 2021
  1. K. Reivich and A. Shatté, “The resilience factor: 7 essential skills for overcoming life’s inevitable obstacles.,” Resil. factor 7 Essent. Ski. overcoming life’s inevitable Obs., 342, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Proag, “Assessing and Measuring Resilience,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 222–229, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Lindbom, H. Tehler, K. Eriksson, and T. Aven, “The capability concept -On how to define and describe capability concerning risk, vulnerability, and resilience,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 135,45–54, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Rus, V. Kilar, and D. Koren, “Resilience assessment of complex urban systems to natural disasters: A new literature review,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.,. 31, January, 311–330, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. R. H. Davies and A. J. Davies, “Increasing communities’ resilience to disasters: An impact-based approach,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 31, May, 742–749, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. E. Kontokosta and A. Malik, “The Resilience to Emergencies and Disasters Index: Applying big data to benchmark and validate neighborhood resilience capacity,” Sustain. Cities Soc., 36, June 2017, 272– 285, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. W. C. Chuang et al., “Enhancing quantitative approaches for assessing community resilience,” J. Environ. Manage., 213, 353–362, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Vona, M. Mastroberti, L. Mitidieri, and S. Tataranna, “New resilience model of communities based on numerical evaluation and observed post-seismic reconstruction process,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 28, January, 602–609 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. E. S. Ranjan and C. C. Abenayake, “A Study on Community’s Perception on Disaster Resilience Concept,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 88–94, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Malalgoda, D. Amaratunga, and R. Haigh, “Challenges in Creating a Disaster Resilient Built Environment,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 736–744, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D. B. Oerther, “From disaster to development: Finance provides a platform to empower technology for resilience to climate change,” Procedia Eng., 159, June, 267–271, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Platt, D. Brown, and M. Hughes, “Measuring resilience and recovery,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 19, May, 447–460, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. K. MacAskill and P. Guthrie, “Multiple Interpretations of Resilience in Disaster Risk Management,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 667–674, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Iordan, M.-N. Chilian, and A. Grigorescu, “Regional Resilience in Romania – Between Realism and Aspirations,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 22, November 2014, 627–635, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. J. Imperiale and F. Vanclay, “Experiencing local community resilience in action: Learning from post-disaster communities,” J. Rural Stud., 47, 204–219, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. O. R. Danar and D. Pushpalal, “Building Community Resilience: Conceptual Framework and its Application in Post Tsunami Resettlement,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 489–496, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Biesbroek, J. Dupuis, and A. Wellstead, “Explaining through causal mechanisms: resilience and governance of social-ecological systems,” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 28, 64–70, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. H. Faber, L. Giuliani, A. Revez, S. Jayasena, J. Sparf, and J. M. Mendez, “Interdisciplinary Approach to Disaster Resilience Education and Research,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 601–609, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Bhattacharya-Mis and J. Lamond, “Socioeconomic Complexities of Flood Memory in Building Resilience: An Overview of Research,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, no. September, 111–119, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Yang et al., “Hurricane evacuations in the face of uncertainty: Use of integrated models to support robust, adaptive, and repeated decision-making,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 36, October 2018, p. 101093 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. W. Zobel and M. Baghersad, “Analytically comparing disaster resilience across multiple dimensions,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., 69, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  22. R. S. Renu, G. Mocko, and A. Koneru, “Use of big data and knowledge discovery to create data backbones for decision support systems,” Procedia Comput. Sci., 20, 446–453, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Lindbom, H. Hassel, H. Tehler, and C. Uhr, “Capability assessments – How to make them useful for decision-making,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 31, no. May, pp. 251–259, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Turner, “Investigating how governmentality and governance influence decision making on projects,” Proj. Leadersh. Soc., 1, May, p. 100003, (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. S. S. L. Hettiarachchi and S. Weeresinghe, “Achieving Disaster Resilience through the Sri Lankan Early Warning System: Good practices of Disaster Risk Reduction and Management,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 789–794, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Saunders; K. Lewis, Philip; Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, Eighth edi. New York: Pearson, [2019]: Print edition typeset in 9.5/12 ITC Slimbach Std by Pearson CSC, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. J. Masys, N. Ray-Bennett, H. Shiroshita, and P. Jackson, “High Impact/Low-Frequency Extreme Events: Enabling Reflection and Resilience in a Hyper-connected World,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 772–779, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. H. Duijnhoven and M. Neef, “Framing Resilience. From a Model-based Approach to a Management Process,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 18, September, 425–430, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Lizarralde, K. Chmutina, L. Bosher, and A. Dainty, “Sustainability and resilience in the built environment: The challenges of establishing a turquoise agenda in the UK,” Sustain. Cities Soc., 15, 96–104, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. W. Miller, “What does built environment research have to do with risk mitigation, resilience, and disaster recovery?” Sustain. Cities Soc., 19, 91–97, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. R. A. Hadiguna, “Decision support framework for risk assessment of sustainable supply chain,” Int. J. Logist. Econ. Glob., 4, 1/2, 35, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Arnott and G. Pervan, “A critical analysis of decision support systems research,” J. Inf. Technol., 20, 2, 67–87, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. F. E. A. Horita, J. P. de Albuquerque, V. Marchezini, and E. M. Mendiondo, “Bridging the gap between decision-making and emerging big data sources: An application of a model-based framework to disaster management in Brazil,” Decis. Support Syst., 97, 12–22, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. G. van Capelleveen, J. van Wieren, C. Amrit, D. M. Yazan, and H. Zijm, “Exploring recommendations for circular supply chain management through interactive visualisation,” Decis. Support Syst., 140, 113431, (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Kameshwar et al., “Probabilistic decision-support framework for community resilience: Incorporating multi-hazards, infrastructure interdependencies, and resilience goals in a Bayesian network,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 191, December, (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.