Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 331, 2021
International Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Management (ICDMM 2021)
Article Number 06002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Transportation and Logistic
Published online 13 December 2021
  1. S. R. N. Panjaitan, “A Study on the Value of Shear Strength in Muara Batang Toru Peat, North Sumatra After Experiencing Initial Compression (Kajian terhadap nilai kuat geser tanah gambut muara Batang Toru Sumatera Utara setelah mengalami pemampatan awal),” J. Ranc. Sipil, 2, no. 1, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Wicaksono and M. Iqbal, “Effectiveness Of Foamed Mortar Light Weight Fill As An Approach Bridge Fill On Sheet-Pile Structures,” J. Jalan-Jembatan, 37, no. 2, 87–101, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ministry of PUPR, “Guidelines for Specifications of Lightweight Materials with Foam Mortar for Road Construction (Pedoman Spesifikasi Material Ringan Dengan Mortar Busa Untuk Konstruksi Jalan,)” 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. A. P. Adi, Y. Lastiasih, and I. B. Mochtar, “Alternative Planning for Road Filling with Sirtu Material and Lightweight Mortar Foam on Batang – Semarang (Alternatif Perencanaan Timbunan Jalan dengan Material Sirtu dan Material Ringan Mortar Busa pada Jalan Tol Batang–Semarang) Seksi III Weleri–Kendal STA 414+ 525–STA 424+ 576,” J. Transp. Sist. Mater. dan Infrastruktur, 1, no. 2, 72–77, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. E. F. Simbolon, “Use of Foam Agent in Making Concrete Brick (Penggunaan Foam Agent Dalam Pembuatan Bata Beton Ringan).” Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Sulaiman, “Water permeability and carbonation on foamed concrete.” Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. T. Santoso, “Use of CSS-Mortar Foam as an Alternative for Selection of Flyover Construction Types on Construction Costs for Road and Bridge Construction (Penggunaan CSS-Mortar Busa Sebagai Alternatif Pemilihan Tipe Konstruksi Jalan Layang terhadap Biaya Konstruksi),” BENTANG J. Teor. dan Terap. Bid. Rekayasa Sipil, 8, no. 2, pp. 87–98, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Al-Shwaiter, H. Awang, and M. A. Khalaf, “The influence of superplasticiser on mechanical, transport and microstructure properties of foam concrete,” J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Calis, S. A. Yildizel, S. Erzin, and B. A. Tayeh, “Evaluation and optimisation of foam concrete containing ground calcium carbonate and glass fibre (experimental and modelling study),” Case Stud. Constr. Mater, 15, e00625, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Kuzielová, L. Pach, and M. Palou, “Effect of activated foaming agent on the foam concrete properties,” Constr. Build. Mater., 125, 998–1004, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Mestnikov, S. Semenov, V. Strokova, and V. Nelubova, “Autoclave foam concrete: Structure and properties,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016, 1698, no. 1, 70010. [Google Scholar]
  12. H. D. Foth, “Fundamentals of soil science,” Soil Sci., 125, no. 4, 272, 1978. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. ASTM, “Standard specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement,” ASTM Int., 1–6, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. Standar Nasional Indonesia, “Concrete Compression Test procedure with Cylindrical Test (Cara Uji kuat tekan beton dengan benda uji silinder),” 1974. [Google Scholar]
  15. Badan Standarisasi Nasional, “Portland Cement Mortar Compressive Strength Test Method for Civil Works (Metode pengujian kekuatan tekan mortar semen Portland untuk pekerjaan sipil),” SNI 03-6825-2002, Indonesia, 2002. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.