Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 236, 2021
3rd International Conference on Energy Resources and Sustainable Development (ICERSD 2020)
Article Number 04024
Number of page(s) 7
Section Green Technology Innovation and Intelligent Application of Environmental Equipment
Published online 09 February 2021
  1. OECD. (2016) A New Rural Development Paradigm for the 21st Century: A Toolkit for Developing Countries, Development Centre Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, [Google Scholar]
  2. Lin, B.Q. (2003) Chinese economic growth, poverty reduction and policy choice. Economic research, 12: 15–25,90 [Google Scholar]
  3. Wan, G.H., Zhang, Y. (2006) Income increase and inequity’s influence to Chinese poverty condition. Economic research, 6:112–123 [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu, P. (2015) the theory of inclusive growth development research. [D], Yunnan University [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, X. (2017) From inclusive growth to inclusive innovation: look at western inclusive theory development and achievement. Chinese development, 17(3):62–68 [Google Scholar]
  6. Addison, T.M. (2012) What is inclusive growth? In: Presentation at Nordic~Baltic MDB Metting.Helsinki.Vol.25 [Google Scholar]
  7. ADB. (2007) Toward a new Asian Development Bank in a New Asia: report of the Eminent Persons Group to the President of the Asian Development Bank[R/OL] [Google Scholar]
  8. The World Bank. (2004) World Development Report 2004: Making Service Work for Poor People. The World Bank Press, Washington [Google Scholar]
  9. The World Bank. (2006) World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. The World Bank Press, Washington [Google Scholar]
  10. The world Bank. (2008) World Development Report 2008: Commission on Growth and Development. The World Bank Press, Washington [Google Scholar]
  11. Ali, I., Son, H., (2007) Defining and measuring inclusive growth: application to the Philippines. ERD working paper series no.98.Manila [Google Scholar]
  12. Biswas,A. (2016) Insight on the evolution and distinction of inclusive growth. Development in Practice, 26(4): 503–16. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, J.J, (2015) Inclusive growth assessment system construction and implementation. Journal of Huaqiao University (philosophy and social sciences edition), 110(5):44–53. [Google Scholar]
  14. Klasen, S. (2010) Measuring and monitoring inclusive growth: multiple definitions, open questions, and some consrtuctive proposals. ADB Sustainable Development WorkingPaper Series,12. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, X.G., Lin, W.X. (2017) Inclusive growthcomments based on the literature review. Technology economy, 36(6):98–108. [Google Scholar]
  16. Du, Z.X., Xiao W.D., Zhan, L. (2010) Structure of inclusive growth theory, core ideas and meaning of the policies. Chinese rural economy, 311 (11):4–14,25 [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, G. (2011) Foundation resource of “inclusive growth”, theory structure and policy direction. Economist, 151(7):12–20. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gao, C.S. (2012) Discussion on core theory development idea. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, humanities, social science edition), 49 (1):32–39,58–159. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cai, X.R. (2009) The formation of the concept of inclusive Growth and its policy implications. Economist, 121(1): 102–103 [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu, Y., Niu, Z.P. (2006) Research on Sustainability Concept and Post-evaluation of Construction Project. Construction Economy, 7: 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rajbhandari B. (2006) Sustainable livelihoods and rural development in South Asia: Issues, concerns, and general implication. Globalizing Rural Develpoment: Competing Paradigm and Emerging Realities,New Delhi:Sage Publications [Google Scholar]
  22. Shell, K., Arrow, K., Kurz, M. (1971) Public Investment, The Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy. The Journal of Finance, 26 (1005). [Google Scholar]
  23. Donaldson, D. (2018) Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure. Am Econ Rev, 108(4-5): 899–934. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P.D, Morgenroth E.L.W. (1999) Infrastructure, transport costs and trade. J Int Econ, 47(1): 169–89. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang, S.J., Ren,B., Zhu,Y.H.,et al. (2010) On the impact of urban and rural integrated development on infrastructure investment. Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition), 16(6): 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, F. (2007) Post-evaluation research on highway construction projects. Nanjing: Hohai University. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhu, J.H., Niu, J.P., Lai, Y.B. (2008) Research on the Performance Evaluation Index System of Expressway Construction Projects. Chinese and Foreign Highways, (1): 198–205. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xiong, W., Chen, B., Wang, H., & Zhu, D. (2020) Public-private partnerships as a governance response to sustainable urbanization: Lessons from China. Habitat International, 95. [Google Scholar]
  29. Batista A.A.D., De francisco A.C. (2018) Organizational Sustainability Practices: A Study of the Firms Listed by the Corporate Sustainability Index. Sustainability, 10(1):71–72 [Google Scholar]
  30. Beiler, M.R.O., Christian,T. (2015) Integrating GIS and AHP to Prioritize Transportation Infrastructure Using Sustainability Metrics. Journal Of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (3). [Google Scholar]
  31. Mansourianfar, M. H., Haghshenas.H. (2018) Microscale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: Case study of Azadi district, Isfahan, Iran. Cities,72: 149–159. [Google Scholar]
  32. Haider, H., et al. (2018) “Sustainability assessment framework for small-sized urban neighbourhoods: An application of fuzzy synthetic evaluation.” Sustainable Cities and Society,36: 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hellstrom, D., et al. (2000) “A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3): 311–321. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ugwu, O. O. and Haupt T. C. (2007). “Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability - a South African construction industry perspective.” Building and Environment, 42(2): 665–680. [Google Scholar]
  35. Garg, A., et al. (2015) Energy infrastructure in India: Profile and risks under climate change. Energy Policy, 81: 226–238. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sierra, L. A., et al. (2017) Method for estimating the social sustainability of infrastructure projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65: 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cheng, Z., et al. (2020) Public-private partnership as a driver of sustainable development: toward a conceptual framework of sustainability-oriented PPP. Environment Development And Sustainability. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sahely, H. R., et al. (2005) Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32(1): 72–85. [Google Scholar]
  39. Koppenjan, J. F. M. and B. Enserink (2009) Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability. Public Administration Review, 69(2): 284–296. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shen, L., et al. (2016) Improving Sustainability Performance for Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Projects. Sustainability, 8 (3). [Google Scholar]
  41. Hussain, S., et al. (2018) Structural Equation Model for Evaluating Factors Affecting Quality of Social Infrastructure Projects. Sustainability, 10 (5). [Google Scholar]
  42. Shen, L., et al. (2016) Improving Sustainability Performance for Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Projects. Sustainability, 8 (3). [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, H., et al. (2019) Identifying Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Water Environment Treatment Public-Private Partnership Projects. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liang, Y. (2019) Sustainable Performance Measurements for Public-Private Partnership Projects: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11 (13). [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu, Y., et al. (2018). Review of social responsibility factors for sustainable development in public-private partnerships. Sustainable Development, 26(6): 515–524 [Google Scholar]
  46. ADB. (2013). Sustainable infrastructure for competitiveness and inclusive growth. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.