Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 237, 2021
3rd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2020)
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environmental Protection and Environmental Engineering
Published online 09 February 2021
  1. Martínez C. M, Hu X, Cao D, Velenis E, et al. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 66, 1-16 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. Feng X, Fang M, He X, et al. J. Power Sources 255, 294-301 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. Koch S, Fill A, Birke KP. J. Power Sources 398, 106-112 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. Benedick. Int. N. 1, 231-246 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  5. Association NFP. NFPA 2001 (2018 Edition). MA 021692018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Standardization IOf. ISO14520-1Third edition 2015-12-01). 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Reinhardt J. W. Behavior of bromotrifluoropropene and pentafluoroethane when subjected to a simulated aerosol can explosion. In: Administration FA, editor. Washington, D. C. USA 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Reinhardt J. W. Aircraft cargo MPS test of FK-5-1-12. In: Administration FA, editor. International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group October 25-26, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pagliaro J. L, Linteris G. T, Sunderland P. B, et al. Combust. Flame 162, 41-49 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  10. Babushok V. I, Linteris G. T, Burgess D. RJr., et al. Combust. Flame 162, 1104-1112 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. Takahashi F, Katta V. R, Linteris G. T, et al. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35, 2741-2748 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu L, Du Z, Zhang T, et al. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 22282-22300 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. Bouvet N, Chauveau C, Gkalp I, et al. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 992-1005 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. Linteris G. T, Babushok V. I, Sunderland P. B, et al. Proc. Combust. Inst. 34, 2683-2690 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Addabbo R, Bechtold J. K, Matalon M. Proc. Combust. Inst. 29. 2, 1527-1535 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  16. Bechtold J. K, Matalon M. Combust. Flame 127, 1906-1913 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun C. J, Sung C. J, He L, et al. Combust. Flame 118, 108-128 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  18. Kee RJ, Rupley FM, Miller JA. Chemkin-II: A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics. United States 1989. [Google Scholar]
  19. CHEMKIN-PRO 15101. Reaction design: San Diego, CA; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kee RJ, Warnatz J, Miller JA. Fortran computer-code package for the evaluation of gas-phase viscosities, conductivities, and diffusion coefficients. [CHEMKIN]. United States 1983. [Google Scholar]
  21. Burbano H. J, Pareja J, Amell A. A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 3232-3242 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  22. Lau L. J. J Econ Theory. 12, 131-163 (1976) [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang Z. H, Weng W. B, He Y, et al. Fuel. 141, 285-292 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. Lapalme D, Seers P. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39, 3477-3486 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  25. Moffat R. J. Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 1, 3-17 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  26. Pagliaro J. L, Linteris G. T. Fire Saf. J. 87, 10-17 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu Xu Yong, et al. J. Fire Sci. 34, 289-304 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. Ren X, Jiang Y, Xu W. J. Fire Sci. 34, 416-430 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. Stephen R. An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications. Boston 2000. [Google Scholar]
  30. Egerton A, Thabet S. K. Proc. R. Soc. London, ser. A. 211, 445-471 (1952) [Google Scholar]
  31. Westbrook C. K. Combust. Sci. Technol. 34, 201-225 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  32. Shebeko Y. N, Azatyan V. V, Bolodian I. A, et al. Combust. Flame 121, 542-547 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  33. Azatyan V. V, Shebeko Y. N, Shebeko A. Y, et al. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 4, 760-768 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  34. Noto T, Babushok V, Hamins A, et al. Combust. Flame 112, 147-160 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  35. G. T. Linteris AM, Tsang W. Halon Replacements ACS Symposium Series 611: American Chemical Society; p. 260-274 (1995). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.