Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 237, 2021
3rd International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2020)
Article Number 04031
Number of page(s) 7
Section Ecological Environment, Urban Planning and Construction
Published online 09 February 2021
  1. L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, and C. Pout, “A review on buildings energy consumption information, ” Energy Build. , Vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 394–398, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Martínez-Zarzoso and A. Maruotti, “The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries, ” Ecol. Econ. , Vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 1344–1353, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. UNECE, “SDG Priorities, ” 2019. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 22-Oct-2019]. [Google Scholar]
  4. U. Berardi, “Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building, ” Sustain. Cities Soc. , Vol. 8, pp. 72–78, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. S. Cordero, S. G. Melgar, and J. M. A. Márquez, “Green building rating systems and the new framework level(s): A critical review of sustainability certification within Europe, ” Energies, Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. T. Doan, A. A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, T. Zhang, A. A. Ghaffarianhoseini, and J. Tookey, “A critical comparison of green building rating systems, ” Build. Environ. , Vol. 123, pp. 243–260, Oct. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. R. Keeble, “The Brundtland Report: ‘Our Common Future, ’” Med. War, Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  8. T. P. Obrecht, R. Kunic, S. Jordan, and M. Dovjak, “Comparison of Health and Well-Being Aspects in Building CertificationSchemes, ” SUSTAINABILITY, Vol. 11, no. 9, May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Vierra, Green Building Standards and certification systems. Steven Winter Associates, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. L. Chao, A. C. Gallego, V. Lopez-Chao, and A. Alvarellos, “Indicators framework for sustainable urban design, ” Atmosphere (Basel). , Vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1–18, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Building Research Establishment, “CEEQUAL Version 6 Technical Manual | International Projects SD6053:0. 0. ” p. 197, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sustinable Sites Initiative and Others, “SITES V2. Rating System for sustainable Land Design and Development, ” Sustainable Site Initiative: Austin, TX, USA. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Mahmoud, T. Zayed, and M. Fahmy, “Development of sustainability assessment tool for existing buildings, ” Sustain. Cities Soc. , Vol. 44, pp. 99–119, Jan. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Penadés-Plà, T. García-Segura, J. V. Martí, and V. Yepes, “A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods applied to the sustainable bridge design, ” Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 8, no. 12. MDPI AG, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Development of sustainable assessment method for Saudi Arabia built environment: weighting system, ” Sustain. Sci. , Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 167–178, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Kang, Y. Lee, and S. Kim, “Sustainable building assessment tool for project decision makers and its development process, ” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. , Vol. 58, pp. 34–47, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. F. M. Ameen, M. Mourshed, and H. Li, “A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design, ” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. , Vol. 55, pp. 110–125, Nov. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Gompf, M. Traverso, and J. Hetterich, “Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: systematic literature review and the way forward, ” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. , Vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1883–1909, Oct. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Medved, “A contribution to the structural model of autonomous sustainable neighbourhoods: New socioeconomical basis for sustainable urban planning, ” J. Clean. Prod. , Vol. 120, pp. 21–30, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Cities, U., & Governments, “Culture: fourth pillar of sustainable development., ” United Cities Local Gov. Policy Statement. , 2010. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Holden, “Sustainability indicator systems within urban governance: Usability analysis of sustainability indicator systems as boundary objects, ” Ecol. Indic. , Vol. 32, pp. 89–96, Sep. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen, “Overview of all criteria for quarters, ” 2020. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 24Nov-2020]. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Merino-Saum, P. Halla, V. Superti, A. Boesch, and C. R. Binder, “Indicators for urban sustainability: Key lessons from a systematic analysis of 67 measurement initiatives, ” Ecol. Indic. , Vol. 119, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Aghaei Chadegani et al., “A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases, ” Asian Soc. Sci. , Vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 18–26, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. Buiding Research Environmentl Assesment Method, “BREEAM Communities. Technical Manual SD202 0. 1: 2012. ” p. 175, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. US Green Building Council, “LEED v 4 for Neigborhood development. ” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. JSCB (Japan Sustainable Building Consortium) and Japan Sustainable Building Consortium, “CASBEE Certification System, ” 2019. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 12-Sep-2019]. [Google Scholar]
  28. European Committee for Standardization, EN 156431: 2010. Sustainability of construction works. Sustainability assessment of buildings. Part 1: General framework. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  29. European Committee for Standardization, EN 156433: 2012. Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of buildings. Part 3: Framewoork for the assessment of social performance. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Medineckiene, E. K. Zavadskas, F. Björk, and Z. Turskis, “Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification, ” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. , Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11–18, Jan. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Čadež and S. Hofmann, “Sustainability assessment scheme for transport infrastructure projects [Anforderungen an die Bewertung der Nachhaltigkeit von Straß enbauwerken], ” Bautechnik, Vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 609–613, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  32. P. Wu, Y. Song, X. Hu, and X. Wang, “A preliminary investigation of the transition from green building to green community: Insights from LEED ND, ” Sustain. , Vol. 10, no. 6, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Dizdaroglu and T. Yigitcanlar, “A parcel-scale assessment tool to measure sustainability through urban ecosystem components: The MUSIX model, ” Ecol. Indic. , Vol. 41, pp. 115–130, Jun. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Xu, R. Keivani, and A. J. Cao, “Urban sustainability indicators re-visited: lessons from property-led urban development in China, ” Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. , Vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 308–322, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. W. W. Kropp and J. K. Lein, “Scenario Analysis for Urban Sustainability Assessment: A Spatial Multicriteria Decision-Analysis Approach, ” Environ. Pract. , Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 133–146, Jun. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. C. Li and J. Li, “Assessing urban sustainability using a multi-scale, theme-based indicator framework: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta region, China, ” Sustain. , Vol. 9, no. 11, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  37. J. F. Nicol and M. A. Humphreys, “Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings, ” in Energy and Buildings, 2002, Vol. 34, no. 6. [Google Scholar]
  38. C. F. R. E. S., “RUROS home page. Rediscovering the Urban Realm and Open Spaces. ” [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 02-Dec-2020]. [Google Scholar]
  39. K. C. Wu and L. Y. Song, “A case for inclusive design: Analyzing the needs of those who frequent Taiwan’s urban parks, ” Appl. Ergon. , Vol. 58, pp. 254–264, 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Beatley and P. Newman, “Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities, ” Sustain. , Vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3328–3345, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  41. H. Eckert, G. Breitschuh, and D. R. Sauerbeck, “Criteria and standards for sustainable agriculture, ” J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. , Vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 337–351, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Naji and J. Gwilliam, “Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools and water system adaptation: A framework to analyse the adaptive capacity in the physical-social context, ” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. , Vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 907–916, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. International WELL Building Institute (IWBI), “The WELL Community Standard. ” p. 148, 2017. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.