Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 246, 2021
Cold Climate HVAC & Energy 2021
Article Number 13004
Number of page(s) 4
Section Energy and IEQ Performance Assessment and Labeling
Published online 29 March 2021
  1. Swedish Energy Agency, 2020. Energiläget 2020. ISBN (pdf) 978–91–89184–52–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boverket, 2020. Tidplan för insatser och åtgärder inför krav på klimatdeklarationer: Uppförande av byggnader. Rapportnummer: 2020:3, ISBN: 978–91–7563–681–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Regeringen, 2017. Det klimatpolitiska ramverket [Accessed from Det klimatpolitiska ramverket -] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buyle, M., Braet, J., Audenaert, A., 2013. Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 26, 379–388. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boverket, 2020. Regulation on climate declarations for buildings: proposal for a roadmap and limit values. Report number: 2020:28, ISBN: 978–91–7563–731–0. [Google Scholar]
  6. Malmqvist, T., Glaumann, M., Scarpellini, S., Zabalza, I., Aranda, A., Llera, E., Díaz, S., 2011. Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines, 2011. Energy 36, 1900–1907. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schlegl, F., Gantner, J., Traunspurger, R., Albrecht, S., Leistner, P., 2019. LCA of buildings in Germany: Proposal for a future benchmark based on existing databases. Energy and Buildings 194, 342–350. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pannier, M-A., Schalbart, P., Peuportier, B., 2018. Comprehensive assessment of sensitivity analysis methods for the identification of influential factors in building life cycle assessment. Journal of cleaner production, 466–480. [Google Scholar]
  9. Basbagill, J., Flager, F., Lepech, M., Fischer, M., 2013. Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Building and Environment 60, 81–92. [Google Scholar]
  10. Soust-Verdaguer, B., Llatas, C., García-Martínez, A., 2016. Simplification in life cycle assessment of single-family houses: A review of recent developments. Building and Environment 103, 215–227. [Google Scholar]
  11. Takano, A., Winter, S., Hughes, M., Linkosalmi, L., 2014. Comparison of lifecycle assessment databases: a case study on building assessment. Building and Environment 79:20–30. [Google Scholar]
  12. Moreno, P.R., Rohmer, S., Ma, H-W., 2015. Analysis of potential relationships between functional analysis and life cycle assessment. Procedia CIRP 29, 390–5. [Google Scholar]
  13. Säynäjoki, A., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S., Horvath, A., 2017. Can life-cycle assessment produce reliable policy guidelines in the building sector? Environmental Research letters 12. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.