EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 251 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 251 (2021) 02072 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
2021 International Conference on Tourism, Economy and Environmental Sustainability (TEES 2021)
Article Number 02072
Number of page(s) 6
Section Environmental Ecological Analysis and Sustainable Development Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125102072
Published online 15 April 2021
  1. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1980. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go g reen: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acade my of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363. [Google Scholar]
  3. Freeman, J. (1997) ‘Socially irresponsible and illega l behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies’, Business and Society, 36(3), pp. 221–249. doi: 10.1177/000765039703600302. [Google Scholar]
  4. Holman, W. R., New, J. R., & Singer, D. (1990). Th e impact of corporate social responsiveness on share holder wealth. In L.E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation an d society research: Studies in theory and measureme nt. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders. as determinants of enviro nmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.230 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim, H., Park, K., & Ryu, D. (2017). Corporate envi ronmental responsibility: A legal origins perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 381–402. https:ZZdoi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2641-L [Google Scholar]
  7. Miras-Rodríguez, M. M., Carrasco-Gallego, A., and Escobar-Pérez, B. (2015) Has the CSR engagement of electrical companies had an effect on their perfor mance? A [Google Scholar]
  8. Closer look at the environment. Bus. Strat. Env., 24: 819–835. doi: 10.1002/bse.1848. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu, Q., Zou, F., Zhang, P. The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium-si zed suppliers in China. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 2019; 26: 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1686 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hao, Y., Fan, C., Long, Y., Pan, J. The role of returne e executives in improving green innovation perform ance of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: Implicat ions for sustainable development strategy. Bus Strat Env. 2019; 28: 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2282 [Google Scholar]
  11. Russo, M. V. V. and Fouts, P. A. A. (1997) ‘A resou rce-based perspective on corporate environmental pe rformance and profitability’, Academy of Managem ent Journal. Academy of Management, 40(3), pp. 534–559. doi: 10.2307/257052. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pan, X., Sinha, P., Chen, X. Corporate social responsi bility and eco-innovation: The triple bottom line per spective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2020; 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2043 [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu, W., Liang, Z., Zhang, Q. Effects of corporate en vironmental responsibility strength and concern on i nnovation performance: The moderating role of firm visibility. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 2020; 27: 1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1902 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate env ironmental ethics on competitive advantage: The me diation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation a nd green image - green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543. [Google Scholar]
  17. Papadas, K. K., Avlonitis, G. J., Carrigan, M., & Pih A.L. (2018). The interplay of strategic and internal g reen marketing orientation on competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research. In press, https://doi.org/10.1016/jjbusres.2018.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  18. Khanna, M., Isik, M., & Zilberman, D. (2002). Costeffectiveness of alternative green payment policies f or conservation technology adoption with heterogen eous land quality. Agricultural Economics, 27(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(02)00034-8 [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, Z., Liao, G., Albitar, K. Does corporate environm ental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Bus Strat Env. 2020; 29: 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416 [Google Scholar]
  20. Makower, J. (2009). Strategies for the green econom y: Opportunities and challenges in the new world of business. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yen, Y. X. (2018). Buyer-supplier collaboration in green practices: The driving effects from stakeholde rs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1666–1678. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2231 [Google Scholar]
  22. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green an d competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Busin ess Review, 73(5), 120–134. [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, M., Lin, H., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Jiang, W. Turni ng corporate environmental ethics into firm perform ance: The role of green marketing programs. Bus Str at Env. 2019; 28: 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2290 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.