EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 253 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 253 (2021) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
2021 International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Management (EEM 2021)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Equipment Engineering Management and its Technical Application
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125303002
Published online 06 May 2021
  1. Harmon, J., Scotti, D. J., Behson, S., Farias, G., Petzel, R., Neuman, J. H., & Keashly, L. (2003). Effects of high-involvement work systems on employee satisfaction and service costs in veterans healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Management, 48(6), 393–406. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, M., Di Fan, D., & Zhu, C.J. (2014). Highperformance work systems, corporate social performance and employee outcomes: Exploring the missing links. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 423–435. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E.C. (2013). The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model. The international Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), 330–351. [Google Scholar]
  4. Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, P.J. (2009). Well-being and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work & Stress, 23(2), 120–136. [Google Scholar]
  5. Robertson, I. T., Cooper, C. L., Sarkar, M., & Curran, T. (2015). Resilience training in the workplace from 2003 to 2014: A systematic review. Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(3), 533–562. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S.A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S.P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. [Google Scholar]
  8. Danvila-del-Valle, I., Estévez-Mendoza, C., & Lara, F.J. (2019). Human resources training: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101, 627–636. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nadeem, K., Riaz, A., & Danish, R.Q. (2019). Influence of high-performance work system on employee service performance and OCB: the mediating role of resilience. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jiang, K., Hu, J. I. A., Liu, S., & Lepak, D.P. (2017). Understanding employees' perceptions of human resource practices: Effects of demographic dissimilarity to managers and coworkers. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 69–91. [Google Scholar]
  11. HajiHassani, S. (2019). A Structural Model to Predict Subjective Well-Being based on Educational, Social, Emotional, Physical, and Security Climate of Schools through Mediation of Emotion Regulation. Quarterly Journal of Family and Research, 16(3), 7–28. [Google Scholar]
  12. Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2017). A scientific review of the remarkable benefits of happiness for successful and healthy living. Happiness, 90–117. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schulte, P., & Vainio, H. (2010). Well-being at work-overview and Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 36(5), 422–429. [Google Scholar]
  14. Schulte, P. A., Guerin, R. J., Schill, A. L., Bhattacharya, A., Cunningham, T. R., Pandalai, S. P., & Stephenson, C.M. (2015). Considerations for incorporating “well-being” in public policy for workers and workplaces. American Journal of Public Health, 105(8), 31–44. [Google Scholar]
  15. Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587–595. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hughes, M., Rigtering, J. C., Covin, J. G., Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 750–768. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chin, W. W., Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S.P. (2008). Structural equation modeling in marketing: Some practical reminders. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 287–298. [Google Scholar]
  19. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. [Google Scholar]
  20. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K.G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  21. Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 5–40. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fornell, C., & Larker, D. (1981). Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.