EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 253 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 253 (2021) 03021 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
2021 International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Management (EEM 2021)
Article Number 03021
Number of page(s) 6
Section Environmental Equipment Engineering Management and its Technical Application
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125303021
Published online 06 May 2021
  1. Imai, K.B.Y. Systemic Innovation and CrossBorder Networks: Transcending Markets and Hierarchies to Create a New Techno-Economies System. In Conference on Science Technology and Economic Growth; OECD:Paris, France, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  2. James A. Demystifying the role of culture in innovative regional economies [J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(9) : 1197–1216. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moran P. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(12): 1129–1151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. North D.C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance [M]. Cambridge university press, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  5. Capello R., Faggian A. Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation process[J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1): 75–87. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sun Yonglei, Dang Xinghua, Song Jing. Research review and future prospects of the factors affecting the formation of cooperative organization conventions[J]. Foreign Economics and Management, 2014, 36(3): 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  7. Grewal D.S. Network power: The social dynamics of globalization[M]. Yale University Press, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayek F.A. The use of knowledge in society[J]. The American economic review, 1945, 35(4): 519–530. [Google Scholar]
  9. Falzon L., Quintane E., Dunn J., et al. Embedding time in positions: Temporal measures of centrality for social network analysis[J]. Social Networks, 2018, 54: 168–178. [Google Scholar]
  10. Oyemomi O., Liu S., Neaga I., et al. How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 94: 313–319. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang Yanping. Research on the Mechanism of Cluster Innovation Network and Regional Cultural Embeddedness--Based on the Theory of Communication Dynamics[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015 (1): 146–153. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li R., Du Y.F., Tang H.J., et al. MNEs’ subsidiary HRMpractices and firm innovative performance: A tacit knowledge approach[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(5): 1388. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim S., Kim H., Kim E. How knowledge flow affects Korean ICT manufacturing firm performance: A focus on open innovation strategy [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2016, 28(10): 1167–1181. [Google Scholar]
  14. Saxenian, Anna Lee. Origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley[J].Research Policy, 2009, 20(05):423. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S.. Inventory reduction and productivity growth: A comparison of Japanese and US automotive sectors. Managerial and Decision Economics, 18(2).2013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Turker D. Analyzing relational sources of power at the interorganizational communication system[J]. European Management Journal, 2014, 32(3): 509–517. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kahkonen A.K. The influence of power position on the depth of collaboration[J]. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu Songqiang, Sun Bo, Wang Lu. The influence of the core enterprise network power in the cluster on the cooperative behavior of supporting enterprises: the moderating effect of relational capital[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017 (13): 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  19. Marsden, T. Towards the Political-Economy of Pluriactivity. J. Rural Stud. 1990, 6, 375–382. [Google Scholar]
  20. Oliver, N. Work Rewards, Work Values, and Organizational Commitment in an Employee-Owned Firm: Evidence from the U.K. Hum. Relat. 1990, 43, 513–526. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Z.; Liang, X.; Zhao, L. Relationship between Industrial Cluster Network Structure and Enterprise Innovation Performance. Sci. Res. 2007, 4, 777–782. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, J.N. The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Inf. Manag. 2001, 38, 323–335. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Den Hooffff, B.; De Ridder, J.A. Knowledge sharing in context: The inflfluence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. J. Knowl. Manag. 2004, 8, 117–130. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cho, K.R.; Lee, J. Firm Characteristics and MNC’s Intra-Network Knowledge Sharing. Manag. Int. Rev. 2004, 44, 435–455. [Google Scholar]
  25. Latiff H.S., Hassan A. Rise and fall of knowledge power: An in-depth investigation[J]. Humanomics, 2008, 24(1):17–2. [Google Scholar]
  26. Knight L., Pye A. Network learning:an empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations[J].Human Relations, 2005, 58(3): 369–392. [Google Scholar]
  27. Diamantopoulos, A., 1993. Modelling with LISREL, a guide for the uninitiated. Journal of Marketing Management 10 (1-3), 105–136. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 1998. In: Multivariate Data Analysis fifth ed PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fiss P.C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2): 393–420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hult, G.T.M.; Ketchen, D.J.; Nichols, E.L. An examination of cultural competitiveness and order fulfillment cycle time within supply chains. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45, 577–586. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. California, USA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fiss P.C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2): 393–420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.