Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 257, 2021
5th International Workshop on Advances in Energy Science and Environment Engineering (AESEE 2021)
Article Number 03070
Number of page(s) 6
Section Environmental Monitoring Repair and Pollution Control
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125703070
Published online 12 May 2021
  1. Guangmin Zhang, Ping Yang, Sihong He, Yu Zheng, Gangbing Song. A power waveform design based on OVSF-PPM for stress wave based wireless power transfer[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 147. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liang Ren, Tao Jiang, Zi-guang Jia, Dong-sheng Li, Chao-lin Yuan, Hong-nan Li. Pipeline corrosion and leakage monitoring based on the distributed optical fiber sensing technology[J]. Measurement, 2018, 122. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li Hongtao. Study on propagation law of wellbore pressure wave in complex fluid medium [D]. Study on propagation law of wellbore pressure wave in complex fluid medium [D]Southwest Petroleum University, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guoxi He, Yongtu Liang, Yansong Li, Mengyu Wu, Liying Sun, Cheng Xie, Feng Li. A method for simulating the entire leaking process and calculating the liquid leakage volume of a damaged pressurized pipeline[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meng Lingya, Fu Juntao, Li Yuxing, Liu Cuiwei, Liu Guangxiao. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2013, 37(02):124-129. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang Fan, Garden, Juna. Simulation and analysis of gas pipeline leakage dynamic process based on TGNET[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 15(S1):94-98. [Google Scholar]
  7. Numerical Simulation Study on Leakage Location of Long Pipeline with Bifurcation Structure [D]. Xi ’an University of Technology, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu Hailiang, Hu Wengang, Yang Fangqiong. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2019, 50(02):304-310. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu Hongwei, Kang Qianqian, Li Xinhong, Chen Guoming. Research on Leakage Law of Subsea Long Gas Pipeline Considering Process Control[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(06):114-120. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu Juntao, Li Yuxing, Li Yutong, Wang Wuchang, Liu Guangxiao, Fang Liping. Production and propagation characteristics of gas pipeline leakage acoustic wave[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2012, 31(08): 604611+647. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang Zixuan, Fan Shidong, Jiang Pan, Xiong Ting. Research on Attenuation Coefficients of Negative Pressure Wave and Leakage Detection of Ordinary Elbow[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Traffic Science & Engineering), 2012, 36(05):997-1000+1004. [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng Wenxing, Wang Zhaoqin, Cheng Wuyi. Comparison and Analysis of Small Hole Leakage Model and Large Hole Leakage Model in High Pressure Gas Pipeline[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2009, 16(04):108110. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Qiang, Zheng Xiaoliang, Xue Sheng, Yuan Hongyong, Fu Ming. A cross location method for gas pipeline leakage with time difference of wave and reach[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 39(03):472-480. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li Chuanxian, Lu Wenwen, Shi Yanan, Du Shicong, Zheng Wangyu, Li Pengyu. Pipeline Leakage Condition Identification Based on Improved CEEMDan-Entropy Method[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2020, 33(01):88-96. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ji Shangshang. Research on Leakage Monitoring System of Water Supply Pipeline Network [D]. Research on Leakage Monitoring System of Water Supply Pipeline Network [D]ebei University of Engineering, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. An Xingxing. Research on Pipeline Leak Detection Based on Deep Learning [D]. Research on Pipeline Leak Detection Based on Deep Learning [D] Northeast Petroleum University, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.