Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2021
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2021)
Article Number 07064
Number of page(s) 9
Section Psychology of Environmentally Responsible Behavior
Published online 20 May 2021
  1. A. I. Grigor’eva, M. Ju. Kolodin, A promising approach to testing knowledge and tests. Distance and virtual learning, 10, 84–91 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  2. D. DiBattista, L. Kurzawa, Examination of the quality of multiple-choice items on classroom tests. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2) (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. L.I. Zharkova, N.V. Kartushina, Testing as a method of controlling knowledge when teaching foreign languages. Internet- Journal «World of Science», 5(2) (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. O.B. Kuz’min, Testing as a method of teaching and controlling the knowledge of students, Scientific research: vectors of development. Conference materials, 71–74 (Cheboksary: CNS «Interaktiv pljus», 2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.C. Butler, Multiple-Choice Testing in Education: Are the Best Practices for Assessment Also Good for Learning? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 323–331 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Adom, J.A. Mensah, D.A. Dake, Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 109–119 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. Ju.V. Zhiltsova, S.E. Korysheva, E.Ju. Holopova, Psychological assistance in the process of final state certification. Psychology and pedagogy of performance, 3, 22–24 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. T.S. Mamontova, O.V. Druzhkova, Psychological and pedagogical support for high school students in the process of preparing for the final examination in computer science. Scientific dialogue, 1, 292–306 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. D.A. Sevost’janov, A.R. Gajnanova, E.V. Liseckaja, Yerks-Dodson Law in Pedagogy and Inversive Relationship Analysis. Siberian Pedagogical journal, 2, 19–23 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. Sh. Raudis, V. Justickis, Yerkes–Dodson Law: The Link Between Stimulation and Learning Success. Psychology Issues, 3, 119–126 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  11. C.D. Riggs, S. Kang, O. Rennie, Positive Impact of Multiple-Choice Question Authoring and Regular Quiz Participation on Student Learning. CBE Life Sci Educ.; 19(2) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. S.I. Gibson, Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online “study questions” leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology. PeerJ. 3 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. D.P. Collins, D. Rasco, V.A. Benassi, Test-enhanced learning: Does deeper processing on quizzes benefit exam performance? Teaching of Psychology, 45(3), 235–238 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. D.P. Larsen, A.C. Butler, H.L. Roediger, 3rd: Comparative effects of test-enhanced learning and self-explanation on long-term retention. Med Educ. 47(7), 674–82 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. G.Ja. Trigub, Testing as a method of training and knowledge control at a university. Nauchno-metodicheskij jelektronnyj zhurnal «Koncept», 3 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Lane, M.R. Raymond, T. M. Haladyna, S. M. Downing, Test development process, Handbook of test development, 3–18 (New York, Routledge, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. J.M. Bugg, M.A. McDaniel, Selective benefits of question self-generation and answering for remembering expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 922–931 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. C.L. Bae, D.J. Therriault, J.L. Redifer, Investigating the testing effect: Retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies. Learning and Instruction, 60(1), 206–214 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Hardy, S.P. Bates, M.M. Casey, K.W. Galloway, K. Ross, A.E. Kay, H. McQueen, Student-generated content: Enhancing learning through sharing multiple-choice questions. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2180–2194 (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.